Search

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect of the cost of subdermal etonogestrel implant (SEI) on the continuation rate one year after insertion, and to assess the reasons given by users to remove the implant before the expiration date. METHODS Prospective cohort study conducted among 265 women who chose the SEI as a contraceptive method in a sexual and reproductive health center in the eastern region of Spain, between October/2012 and October/2017. The sample was divided into two cohorts depending on the cost of the implant for the user (free-of-charge or requiring partial payment). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare the cumulative removal rates of free implants with partially paid implants within the first year of insertion. Cox proportional hazards models were used to control for confounders. RESULTS After adjusting for confounders, no significant associations were found between the cost of the implant and its removal within a year of insertion. No significant associations were found in the reasons given for implant removal and for the duration of implant use. CONCLUSIONS Cost was not associated with SEI continuation rates within the first year of use. No other significant variables were found to explain implant removal within one year of use.