Search

Traditional obstetric units are inadequate for the level of monitoring required in pre-eclamptic patients. It remains to be determined which facility and tools should be implemented. The aim of this work was to identify predictive factors of admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions for pregnancy-related hypertensive complications.We conducted an observational, retrospective multicenter study (Toulouse, Nantes). Both have a level III maternity unit and an ICU. The selected patients had one or more of the following diagnoses on admission in the ICU or during hospitalization: pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, Acute Fatty Liver of Pregnancy (AFLP), Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS). SAPS II, SOFA and APACHE II on admission, and a validated nursing workload assessment score: TISS 28, were collected.211 parturient women were included. According to the multivariate analysis: APACHE II and SAPS 2 severity scores15 were significantly higher in the TISS 28 ≥ 20 group. There were also higher rates of uricemia360 mmol/l.To date, there are no reliable and validated predictive factors of severity to guide the transfer of pre-eclamptic patients to an ICU. The combination of an increased APACHE II score and uricemia, as well as a high care workload score that could help with the transfer of high-risk pre-eclamptic patients to a specific care facility. This hypothesis should be tested prospectively. This work could incite reflection on the value of creating obstetric intensive care units, according to the size of the maternity unit.

HELLP syndrome is a rare and severe pregnancy complication which exposes to severe maternal and fetal morbidity. Management of HELLP syndrome occurring before 34 weeks of gestation (WG) is still controversial but conservative management may be beneficial in patients with stable HELLP syndrome. The aim of the study was thus to identify which maternal and fetal prognostic factors could be predictive of HELLP syndrome evolution.From 2003 to 2016, all patients with HELLP syndrome occurring between 26 and 34 WG were retrospectively enrolled. Study population was stratified according to obstetrical management. Patients in whom delivery was initiated within 48 h following diagnosis constituted the active management group. In the expectant management group, pregnancy was prolonged until maternal or fetal follow up indicated delivery.Ninety-nine patients were included in our study. Among them, 61 were managed expectantly. At baseline, the active management group was more likely to suffer from persistent hyperreflexia (While expectant management in HELLP syndrome might be beneficial through its reduction of prematurity, it cannot be conducted in all patients. Identification of baseline parameters predictive of disease evolution is thus of tremendous importance to define which obstetrical approach should be prioritized.