1. Using State School Accountability Data to Evaluate Federal Programs: A Long Uphill Road
- Author
-
Sheila Nataraj Kirby, Heather Barney, Scott Naftel, J. R. Lockwood, Daniel F. McCaffrey, and Jennifer Sloan McCombs
- Subjects
Program evaluation ,Measure (data warehouse) ,Data collection ,Computer science ,business.industry ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Public administration ,Public relations ,Education ,Test (assessment) ,Educational research ,Accountability ,ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION ,Developmental and Educational Psychology ,Quality (business) ,business ,Reliability (statistics) ,media_common - Abstract
Evaluations of federal programs designed to improve student achievement generally depend on data gathered by the states for school accountability purposes, rather than data specifically designed for program evaluation. In addition, these data are available at the school level but not at the student level. This article first discusses issues related to the quality of school-level data collected as part of state accountability systems, including the reliability and validity of school-level test scores as a measure of the value added by schools to student learning. It then outlines various ways in which school-level data can be usefully analyzed and illustrates the challenges inherent in doing so, including the challenges of aggregating data across states to find an overall program effect. The final section discusses the implications of the arguments presented here for measuring changes in school performance and linking these effects to a specific program. Ultimately, our ability to measure changes in outcom...
- Published
- 2002
- Full Text
- View/download PDF