Search

Biotic interactions have critical effects on the structure of ecological communities, and the variation in the strength of these interactions over space and time contributes to biogeographic variation in communities. Predation shapes community composition in a variety of habitats, although there have been comparatively few experimental studies of these effects across latitudinal scales. We tested the impact of predator exclusion on the development of epifaunal communities across 3 sites (Florida [USA], Belize, and Panama) in seagrass habitats dominated by Thalassia testudinum using caged and uncaged settlement panels. We found that predators altered composition and slowed development of epifaunal communities. The nature and magnitude of these effects, however, were complex, site-dependent, and tightly coupled to community development. Fast-growing, soft-bodied species dominated space when predators were excluded, while more resistant calcifying species were dominant in communities exposed to predators. In Panama, non-native ascidians dominated communities in cages, while ascidians were consumed when exposed to predators, indicating the importance of biotic resistance at that site. Predators also reduced the abundance of associated small mobile fauna, and the positive correlation between mobile faunal abundances and sessile biomass in our study suggests a potential indirect effect of predator-mediated habitat modification. Overall, prey characteristics were important in explaining the site-specific effects of predators on communities, indicating that taxonomic resolution can influence the results of multi-regional studies examining the mechanisms affecting community structure.

To investigate how the interactions between the closely related sponge species Aplysina cauliformis and Aplysina fulva and their symbiotic microbial communities vary under changing environmental conditions, we conducted a manipulative shading experiment with treat- ments spanning a gradient of 6 irradiances. In A. cauliformis, there was a tight coupling of sym- biont and host metabolism across treatments, and changes in growth rate were correlated more with shifts in symbiont δ 13 C and δ 15 N values than with shade treatment. In contrast, symbiont and host C metabolism were weakly coupled in A. fulva, and the growth of this species was not corre- lated with shifts in symbiont δ 13 C and δ 15 N values. In addition, although photosymbiont meta - bolism was an important driver of shifts in holobiont C and N metabolism of both host species, host and photosymbiont C metabolism were only correlated in A. cauliformis. Thus, although both species host stable, abundant, and similar photosymbiont communities, each host forms a unique mutualism with its symbionts. These 2 host species may be on different evolutionary trajectories, potentially allowing each to exploit novel niche space in coral reef ecosystems. This study pro- vides data in support of the hypothesis that these symbioses represent a dynamic balance of costs and benefits and provides evidence that, because these costs and benefits are highly species - specific, not all species will respond similarly to environmental fluctuations.