Search

Background: Significant efficacy of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy has been demonstrated for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, the appropriate dose of oxaliplatin, and the efficacy and toxicity of administration of oxaliplatin subsequent to cisplatin therapy still remain unclear., Patients and Methods: In total, 55 patients with AGC that were scheduled to receive oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy were prospectively examined., Results: The median age was 67 years and oxaliplatin was administered to 39 (71%) patients as first-line and in 16 (29%) patients as second-line therapy. An initial dose of 130 or 100 mg/m 2 of oxaliplatin was administered to 11 and 36 patients, respectively. The overall response rates (ORR) and median progression free survival (mPFS) were 86 and 33%, and 7.2 and 7.8 months, respectively. Compared to 100 mg/m 2 , the relative dose intensity was significantly lower and severe toxicity tended to increase with oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m 2 A total of 10 patients (18%) had a prior cisplatin-based therapy. The ORR of the patients pretreated with cisplatin was 14% and the mPFS was 6.1 months., Conclusion: An initial oxaliplatin dose of 130 mg/m 2 resulted in a good response, but tended to increase the risk of toxicity. Subsequent oxaliplatin-based therapy after cisplatin exhibited modest efficacy, especially in cases with cisplatin intolerance., (Copyright© 2017, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: TAS-102 is an anti-metabolite which demonstrated activity against multidrug-resistant advanced colorectal cancer. Its major toxicities are hematological disorders., Patients and Methods: Background, TAS-102 efficacy, toxicities and outcomes for patients with multidrug-resistant advanced colorectal cancer from six Institutions of the Kyushu Medical Oncology Group were retrospectively surveyed., Results: Forty-three patients, including fragile patients due to declining performance status and other comorbidities (37%) were analyzed. Efficacy was reflected in an objective overall response of 3%, median progression-free survival of 74 days (2.5 months) and median overall survival of 229 days (7.6 months). The most frequent Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (44%), leukopenia (26%) and anemia (23%). Febrile neutropenia was found in 7%. Sub-group analysis demonstrated an improved outcome on treatment with the sequence regorafenib-TAS-102., Conclusion: TAS-102 was safely administered to modestly fragile patients with equivalent efficacy to that for the non-fragile population. Further investigation of sequential treatment using regorafenib and TAS-102 is needed., (Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.)

Background: Salvage-line regorafenib monotherapy exhibited a marked survival benefit for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the toxicity of this regimen has resulted in the clinical use of a reduced dose of regorafenib., Patients and Methods: Thirty-two Japanese mCRC patients (median age=61 years) who had been treated with regorafenib were retrospectively examined., Results: Best objective response rate was 0% and stable disease (SD) was 31%. Median progression-free survival was 81 days and median overall survival was 233 days. Adverse events of any grade were observed in all patients: 17 (53%) patients suffered grade 3 or 4 adverse events including fatigue (13%), anorexia (13%), hand-foot skin reaction (22%) and elevations of alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (19%/16%). One patient with grade 5 liver dysfunction was identified (3%). Twenty-nine (91%) patients required treatment dose reduction or a delay in treatment. The relative dose intensity was 59%. Regorafenib treatments were terminated because of disease progression (59%) or adverse events (34%)., Conclusion: Despite a decrease in the intensity of regorafenib treatment, because of severe adverse events, a fairly favorable efficacy was achieved in Japanese patients., (Copyright© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.)

Background: Bevacizumab (BV) is widely used in chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Although specific adverse events have been observed, their risk factors have not been clarified., Patients and Methods: 178 mCRC patients who underwent chemotherapy were retrospectively examined and correlations between possible risk factors and adverse events were analyzed., Results: 87 out of 178 patients were treated with BV-containing chemotherapy. Possible risk factors for BV-related adverse events were: remaining primary tumor, current bleeding, history of arterial thromboembolism (ATE), hypertension, and proteinuria, and these were observed in 22%, 2%, 7%, 16%, and 8% of patients, respectively. Patients with hypertension prior to chemotherapy developed significantly worse hypertension (p=0.018). Gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 3 out of 18 patients with residual primary tumor (16.7%) and 6 out of 63 patients with no primary tumor (8.7%) (p=0.385)., Conclusion: Pre-existing hypertension appears to be a risk factor for BV-related deterioration of hypertension.

Background: Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (PM) is an extremely rare disease. Pemetrexed and platinum have been used for advanced PM following malignant pleural mesothelioma (PLM). Because PM differs considerably from PLM in clinical features, the efficacy and safety of these therapies have yet to be established., Patients and Methods: Six Japanese patients with PM who had been treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in four Institutions were retrospectively identified. Treatment response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were examined. Toxicities of therapy were also evaluated., Results: Three patients with mild ascites achieved clinical benefits (one with partial response and two with stable disease). Treatments with reduced cisplatin or carboplatin for patients with massive ascites were safely performed. Median PFS and OS were 7.2 and 13.1 months, respectively. Grade 3 hematological toxicities appeared in two patients with massive ascites., Conclusion: Selection of chemotherapy based on the patient's condition, such as ascites, might be important for advanced PM.

The combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (CDDP) has been reported to be active against metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) and great synergy has been shown in vivo and in vitro when 5-FU precedes CDDP. The sequential combination of S-1 (tegafur, oxonic acid, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine) followed by CDDP for MGC was investigated. A phase I trial applying increasing doses of oral administration of S-1 (65-80 mg/m(2)) for 21 days and increasing doses of CDDP (60-80 mg/m(2)) on day 22 every 35 days was conducted in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose. Patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer, no prior chemotherapy, measurable disease, ECOG performance status less than 3 and adequate organ functions were eligible for the study. Three patients were treated at each dose level with escalation based on toxicity. Fifteen patients were included and evaluated for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and MTD. DLT included NCICTC grade 3 anorexia and fatigue in patients treated at S-1 80 mg/m(2) and CDDP 80 mg/m(2) (dose level 5). The other toxicities, grade 3 or higher, included neutropenia (grade 3) and nausea/vomiting (grade 3). Non-hematological toxicities were grade 1/2 and included diarrhea, nausea and stomatitis. There was no treatment-related mortality. Therefore, the recommended dose was a combination of S-1 at 80 mg/m(2) and CDDP at 70 mg/m(2). This sequential administration of S-1 and CDDP every 35 days is tolerable and warrants a phase II trial. A multicenter phase II study is currently under way.