1. A comparison of different bioinks for 3D bioprinting of fibrocartilage and hyaline cartilage.
- Author
-
Daly AC, Critchley SE, Rencsok EM, and Kelly DJ
- Subjects
- Alginates chemistry, Animals, Bone Marrow Cells cytology, Cell Differentiation drug effects, Cell Survival, Cells, Cultured, Chondrogenesis drug effects, Compressive Strength, Glucuronic Acid chemistry, Hexuronic Acids chemistry, Hydrogels chemistry, Mesenchymal Stem Cells cytology, Mesenchymal Stem Cells metabolism, Printing, Three-Dimensional, Sepharose chemistry, Swine, Tissue Engineering methods, Transforming Growth Factor beta pharmacology, Bioprinting methods, Fibrocartilage physiology, Hyaline Cartilage physiology, Tissue Scaffolds chemistry
- Abstract
Cartilage is a dense connective tissue with limited self-repair capabilities. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) laden hydrogels are commonly used for fibrocartilage and articular cartilage tissue engineering, however they typically lack the mechanical integrity for implantation into high load bearing environments. This has led to increased interested in 3D bioprinting of cell laden hydrogel bioinks reinforced with stiffer polymer fibres. The objective of this study was to compare a range of commonly used hydrogel bioinks (agarose, alginate, GelMA and BioINK™) for their printing properties and capacity to support the development of either hyaline cartilage or fibrocartilage in vitro. Each hydrogel was seeded with MSCs, cultured for 28 days in the presence of TGF-β3 and then analysed for markers indicative of differentiation towards either a fibrocartilaginous or hyaline cartilage-like phenotype. Alginate and agarose hydrogels best supported the development of hyaline-like cartilage, as evident by the development of a tissue staining predominantly for type II collagen. In contrast, GelMA and BioINK
™ (a PEGMA based hydrogel) supported the development of a more fibrocartilage-like tissue, as evident by the development of a tissue containing both type I and type II collagen. GelMA demonstrated superior printability, generating structures with greater fidelity, followed by the alginate and agarose bioinks. High levels of MSC viability were observed in all bioinks post-printing (∼80%). Finally we demonstrate that it is possible to engineer mechanically reinforced hydrogels with high cell viability by co-depositing a hydrogel bioink with polycaprolactone filaments, generating composites with bulk compressive moduli comparable to articular cartilage. This study demonstrates the importance of the choice of bioink when bioprinting different cartilaginous tissues for musculoskeletal applications.- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF