8 results on '"Ginjaume, M."'
Search Results
2. Feasibility study of computational occupational dosimetry: evaluating a proof-of-concept in an endovascular and interventional cardiology setting.
- Author
-
O’Connor, U, Walsh, C, Gorman, D, O’Reilly, G, Martin, Z, Madhavan, P, Murphy, R T, Szirt, R, Almén, A, Andersson, M, Camp, A, Garcia, V, Duch, M A, Ginjaume, M, Abdelrahman, M, Lombardo, P, and Vanhavere, F
- Subjects
DOSIMETERS ,RADIATION dosimetry ,MONTE Carlo method ,RADIATION measurements ,FEASIBILITY studies ,RADIATION protection ,RADIATION sources - Abstract
Individual monitoring of radiation workers is essential to ensure compliance with legal dose limits and to ensure that doses are As Low As Reasonably Achievable. However, large uncertainties still exist in personal dosimetry and there are issues with compliance and incorrect wearing of dosimeters. The objective of the PODIUM (Personal Online Dosimetry Using Computational Methods) project was to improve personal dosimetry by an innovative approach: the development of an online dosimetry application based on computer simulations without the use of physical dosimeters. Occupational doses were calculated based on the use of camera tracking devices, flexible individualised phantoms and data from the radiation source. When combined with fast Monte Carlo simulation codes, the aim was to perform personal dosimetry in real-time. A key component of the PODIUM project was to assess and validate the methodology in interventional radiology workplaces where improvements in dosimetry are needed. This paper describes the feasibility of implementing the PODIUM approach in a clinical setting. Validation was carried out using dosimeters worn by Vascular Surgeons and Interventional Cardiologists during patient procedures at a hospital in Ireland. Our preliminary results from this feasibility study show acceptable differences of the order of 40% between calculated and measured staff doses, in terms of the personal dose equivalent quantity H
p (10), however there is a greater deviation for more complex cases and improvements are needed. The challenges of using the system in busy interventional rooms have informed the future needs and applicability of PODIUM. The availability of an online personal dosimetry application has the potential to overcome problems that arise from the use of current dosimeters. In addition, it should increase awareness of radiation protection among staff. Some limitations remain and a second phase of development would be required to bring the PODIUM method into operation in a hospital setting. However, an early prototype system has been tested in a clinical setting and the results from this two-year proof-of-concept PODIUM project are very promising for future development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Comparison of air kerma area product and air kerma meter calibrations for X-ray radiation qualities used in diagnostic radiology
- Author
-
Hourdakis, C J, primary, Csete, I, additional, Daures, J, additional, Jarvinen, H, additional, Mihailescu, L-C, additional, Sochor, V, additional, Novak, L, additional, Pedersen, M, additional, Kosunen, A, additional, Toroi, P, additional, Denoziere, M, additional, Büermann, L, additional, Megzifene, A, additional, Einarsson, G, additional, Ferrari, P, additional, dePooter, J, additional, Bjerke, H, additional, Brodecki, M, additional, Cardoso, J, additional, Bercea, S, additional, Ciraj-Bjelac, O, additional, Compel, J, additional, Glavič-Cindro, D, additional, Ginjaume, M, additional, Persson, L, additional, and Grindborg, J -E, additional
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Report of Task Group on the implications of the implementation of the ICRP recommendations for a revised dose limit to the lens of the eye
- Author
-
Broughton, J, primary, Cantone, M C, additional, Ginjaume, M, additional, and Shah, B, additional
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Photonuclear isotope characterization of a Siemens KDS 18 MV linac head
- Author
-
Roig, M, primary, Panettieri, V, additional, Ginjaume, M, additional, and Sánchez-Reyes, A, additional
- Published
- 2004
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Effect of the radiation protective apron on the response of active and passive personal dosemeters used in interventional radiology and cardiology
- Author
-
Sara Principi, Joanna Domienik-Andrzejewska, Isabelle Clairand, Lukas Exner, Paolo Ferrari, Dragana Krstic, M. Brodecki, Zoran Jovanovic, Mercè Ginjaume, Filip Vanhavere, Olivier Van Hoey, Eleftheria Carinou, Institut de Tecniques Energetiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya [Barcelona] (UPC), PSE-SANTE/SDOS/LDRI, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Agenzia Nazionale per le nuove Tecnologie, l’energia e lo sviluppo economico sostenibile (ENEA), University of Kragujevac, Ginjaume, M., Carinou, E., Brodecki, M., Clairand, I., Domienik-Andrzejewska, J., Exner, L., Ferrari, P., Jovanovic, Z., Krstic, D., Principi, S., Van Hoey, O., Vanhavere, F., Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Institut de Tècniques Energètiques, and Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. DRM - Dosimetria i Radiofísica Mèdica
- Subjects
Cardiac Catheterization ,Double dosimetry ,Montecarlo, Mètode de ,Radiography, Interventional ,Effective dose (radiation) ,passive personal dosemeter ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,0302 clinical medicine ,Radiation dosimetry ,Protective Clothing ,Medicine ,Fluoroscopy ,Waste Management and Disposal ,Eye lens equivalent dose ,[PHYS]Physics [physics] ,eye lens equivalent dose ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,double dosimetry ,Interventional radiology ,General Medicine ,3. Good health ,Monte Carlo method ,Eye -- Protection ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Passive personal dosemeter ,Radiation monitoring ,Ulls -- Protecció ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Ciències de la salut::Medicina [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC] ,Active personal dosemeter ,Radiation ,active personal dosemeter ,interventional radiology ,03 medical and health sciences ,Radiation Protection ,Física::Electromagnetisme [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC] ,Humans ,Dosimetry ,Medical physics ,Ciències de la salut::Medicina::Diagnòstic per la imatge [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC] ,Radiació -- Dosimetria ,Dosimeter ,Física [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC] ,Radiation Dosimeters ,business.industry ,Equivalent dose ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,business - Abstract
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: “Ginjaume, M. [et al.]. Effect of the radiation protective apron on the response of active and passive personal dosemeters used in interventional radiology and cardiology. "Journal of radiological protection, Març 2019, vol. 39, núm. 1, p. 97-111.” which has been published in final form at [doi: 10.1002/pc.23230]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with https://publishingsupport.iopscience.iop.org/open_access/ In fluoroscopy guided interventional procedures, workers use protective garments and often two personal dosemeters, the readings of which are used for the estimation of the effective dose; whereas the dosemeter above the protection can be used for the estimation of the equivalent dose of the lens of the eye. When a protective apron is worn the scattered field that reaches the dosemeter is different from the case where no protection is used; this study analyses the changes in the response of seven passive and eight active personal dosemeters (APDs) when they are placed above a lead or lead equivalent garment for S-Cs and x-ray diagnostic qualities. Monte Carlo simulations are used to support the experimental results. It is found that for passive dosemeters, the influence on the dosemeter's response to the lead or lead equivalent was within the range 15%–38% for the x-ray qualities. This effect is smaller, of the order of 10%, when lead-free garments are used, and much smaller, within 1%–10%, for most of the APDs used in the study. From these results it is concluded that when comparing passive and active dosemeter measurements worn above the protection, a difference of 20%–40% is expected. The effect is small when deriving the effective dose from double dosimetry algorithms, but it can be of major importance when eye lens monitoring is based on the use of the dosemeter worn above the protection.
- Published
- 2019
7. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
- Author
-
Panettieri V, Wennberg B, Gagliardi G, Duch MA, Ginjaume M, and Lax I
- Subjects
- Body Burden, Humans, Monte Carlo Method, Movement, Radiotherapy Dosage, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Algorithms, Lung Neoplasms physiopathology, Lung Neoplasms radiotherapy, Radiosurgery methods, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted methods, Respiratory Mechanics, Software
- Abstract
The purpose of this work was to simulate with the Monte Carlo (MC) code PENELOPE the dose distribution in lung tumours including breathing motion in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Two phantoms were modelled to simulate a pentagonal cross section with chestwall (unit density), lung (density 0.3 g cm(-3)) and two spherical tumours (unit density) of diameters respectively of 2 cm and 5 cm. The phase-space files (PSF) of four different SBRT field sizes of 6 MV from a Varian accelerator were calculated and used as beam sources to obtain both dose profiles and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) in different volumes of interest. Dose distributions were simulated for five beams impinging on the phantom. The simulations were conducted both for the static case and including the influence of respiratory motion. To reproduce the effect of breathing motion different simulations were performed keeping the beam fixed and displacing the phantom geometry in chosen positions in the cranial and caudal and left-right directions. The final result was obtained by combining the different position with two motion patterns. The MC results were compared with those obtained with three commercial treatment planning systems (TPSs), two based on the pencil beam (PB) algorithm, the TMS-HELAX (Nucletron, Sweden) and Eclipse (Varian Medical System, Palo Alto, CA), and one based on the collapsed cone algorithm (CC), Pinnacle(3) (Philips). Some calculations were also carried out with the analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) in the Eclipse system. All calculations with the TPSs were performed without simulated breathing motion, according to clinical practice. In order to compare all the TPSs and MC an absolute dose calibration in Gy/MU was performed. The analysis shows that the dose (Gy/MU) in the central part of the gross tumour volume (GTV) is calculated for both tumour sizes with an accuracy of 2-3% with PB and CC algorithms, compared to MC. At the periphery of the GTV the TPSs overestimate the dose up to 10%, while in the lung tissue close to the GTV PB algorithms overestimate the dose and the CC underestimates it. When clinically relevant breathing motions are included in the MC simulations, the static calculations with the TPSs still give a relatively accurate estimate of the dose in the GTV. On the other hand, the dose at the periphery of the GTV is overestimated, compared to the static case.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Monte Carlo simulation of MOSFET detectors for high-energy photon beams using the PENELOPE code.
- Author
-
Panettieri V, Duch MA, Jornet N, Ginjaume M, Carrasco P, Badal A, Ortega X, and Ribas M
- Subjects
- Algorithms, Calibration, Computer Simulation, Humans, Monte Carlo Method, Particle Accelerators, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted, Software, Thermoluminescent Dosimetry methods, X-Rays, Photons, Radiometry instrumentation, Radiometry methods
- Abstract
The aim of this work was the Monte Carlo (MC) simulation of the response of commercially available dosimeters based on metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs) for radiotherapeutic photon beams using the PENELOPE code. The studied Thomson&Nielsen TN-502-RD MOSFETs have a very small sensitive area of 0.04 mm(2) and a thickness of 0.5 microm which is placed on a flat kapton base and covered by a rounded layer of black epoxy resin. The influence of different metallic and Plastic water build-up caps, together with the orientation of the detector have been investigated for the specific application of MOSFET detectors for entrance in vivo dosimetry. Additionally, the energy dependence of MOSFET detectors for different high-energy photon beams (with energy >1.25 MeV) has been calculated. Calculations were carried out for simulated 6 MV and 18 MV x-ray beams generated by a Varian Clinac 1800 linear accelerator, a Co-60 photon beam from a Theratron 780 unit, and monoenergetic photon beams ranging from 2 MeV to 10 MeV. The results of the validation of the simulated photon beams show that the average difference between MC results and reference data is negligible, within 0.3%. MC simulated results of the effect of the build-up caps on the MOSFET response are in good agreement with experimental measurements, within the uncertainties. In particular, for the 18 MV photon beam the response of the detectors under a tungsten cap is 48% higher than for a 2 cm Plastic water cap and approximately 26% higher when a brass cap is used. This effect is demonstrated to be caused by positron production in the build-up caps of higher atomic number. This work also shows that the MOSFET detectors produce a higher signal when their rounded side is facing the beam (up to 6%) and that there is a significant variation (up to 50%) in the response of the MOSFET for photon energies in the studied energy range. All the results have shown that the PENELOPE code system can successfully reproduce the response of a detector with such a small active area.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.