1. Dosimetry at cellular level for the alpha-emitting radionuclides actinium-225, astatine-211 and radium-223 for bone metastasis cells from castration resistant prostate cancer.
- Author
-
Oliveira-Silva, Catherine C, Maillard, Mateus S, Silva, Raoni, and Sá, Lidia V
- Subjects
- *
CASTRATION-resistant prostate cancer , *MONTE Carlo method , *MEDICAL dosimetry , *BONE metastasis , *BONE cells - Abstract
Objectives. The aim of this work is to evaluate energy deposition in the nucleus and cytoplasm in targeted alpha therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer by modeling two cell lines, PC3 (osteolytic) and LNCaP C4-2 (osteoblastic), for actinium-225, astatine-211, and radium-223 and their progeny, using Monte Carlo simulations with the GATE/Geant4 code. Approach. We developed single cell and cell clusters models to Monte Carlo simulations, performed on the GATE platform version 9.3, with the GEANT4-DNA physics list emstandard_opt3_mixed_dna for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 progenies. We considered three radionuclide distributions as a sources: the nucleus, the cytoplasm and the whole cell. Main results. When the nucleus was considered as a target, the S -values (N←N) calculated for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 progenies were significantly higher, within 60%-90%, than S -values (N←Cy), demonstrating less influence of cytoplasm only internalization. When the cytoplasm was considering as a target, the S -values (Cy←Cy) calculated for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 progeny were significantly higher, within 30%–90%, than the S -values (Cy←N). When no progeny migration occurs and for target nucleus, the cumulative S -values (N←N) calculated for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 were significantly higher, within 50%–70%, than the S -values (N←N) computed for At-211, Ac-225, and Ra-223. Comparing the cumulative S -values, Ac-225 and Ra-223 therapies is more effective, in terms of deposited energy in a target, than that with At-211. Significance. The data presented in this research indicates that Ac-225 therapy may be the optimum choice due to the energy deposited in the nucleus, as long as the recoil effects and redistribution of progeny are understood. In contrast, At-211 is an alternative to avoid progeny migration. However, to completely analyze the efficacy of radionuclide therapy, other parameters must be considered, such as biological half-life, stability of the transport molecule, progeny migration, excretion pathways, and uptake in different organs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF