Search

Background: Preclinical studies in transgenic models of Alzheimer's disease (AD) suggest that DHP1401 has neuroprotective and memory-enhancing effects.Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of DHP1401 in AD patients treated with donepezilMethods:Methods: In a double-blind study, patients with mild-to-moderate AD were randomized (1:1:1) to receive a twice daily total dose of 500 mg or 1000 mg DHP1401 or placebo for 24 weeks. Tolerability and safety were monitored at baseline and weeks 12 and 24.Results: total of 180 patients were randomized to Active 1 (500 mg: n = 62), Active 2 (1000 mg: n = 53), and control groups (n = 65) in 16 sites in Korea. There was no significant difference in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog) score, the primary efficacy endpoint, from baseline. However, in the subgroup with mild AD patients (MMSE, 20-26) who received the high dose of DHP1401 and the group that received donepezil 5 mg, the ADAS-cog scores improved. MMSE and K-TMT-e type B were significant in both active groups at week 24. The most frequently observed symptom was dizziness (2.78%), and the most commonly observed reactions were related to metabolism and nutrition disorders (5.00%). No remarkable adverse events were observed for 24 weeks.Conclusion: Although the effectiveness of DHP1401 was not proved to be superior as the primary efficacy endpoint, the secondary endpoints, MMSE and K-TMT-e type B, showed significant beneficial effects. Also, the subgroups showed that ADAS-cog scores significantly were improved. DHP1401 could be proven beneficial for the AD treatment by further clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Effective treatments to alleviate depression in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been scarce.Objective: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram in the treatment of depression in AD.Methods: In this 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with open-label, 12-week extension, AD subjects over 50 years of age, with depression defined by Olin's provisional diagnostic criteria, were enrolled. The Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD), and other measures of depression and cognition were repeated.Results: 91 subjects were screened, and 84 were randomized into either the study group or placebo group (n = 42 for both groups). Twenty-four subjects (29%) were unable to finish the study, yielding a per protocol population of 60 subjects (study group: n = 27; placebo group: n = 33). At week 12, differences in measures of depression and cognition between the two groups were not statistically significant. However, exploratory analysis suggested that further research on a subset of subjects with 'definite major depression' (baseline CSDD score ≥18) is needed. The number of treatment-related adverse-events (AE) did not differ between groups (p = 0.83) and no serious treatment-related AE were observed.Conclusion: The use of escitalopram was well tolerated in depressive dementia patients. Future studies focusing on subjects with more severe levels of depression, and with more statistical power, will be needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background& Objective: Depression frequently combines with dementia, including early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD). We investigated differences in prevalence and characteristics of depressive symptoms according to dementia severity in EOAD patients.Methods: The 15-item Korean version of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) was administered to 412 EOAD patients. Factor analysis was used to assess GDS-15 factor structure. We subdivided participants into three groups by disease severity, then compared the frequencies and scores of individual GDS-15 items and performed logistic regression analysis to assess associations between depressive symptoms and EOAD stage.Results: Factor analysis yielded three factor categories: 1) "hopelessness and ominousness" (symptoms no. 6, 8, 12, 14, 15); 2) "unhappiness and dissatisfaction" (no. 1, 3, 5, 7, 11); and 3) "monotony and lack of energy" (no. 2, 4, 9, 10, 13). Factor 2 depressive symptoms (no. 1, 5, 11) were less common in moderate EOAD. The risk of Factor 1 symptoms: no. 12 (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.19-3.50; p = 0.010) and 14 (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.07-3.16; p = 0.028) was higher in mild than very mild EOAD. The risk of Factor 2 symptoms: no. 9 (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.08-6.71; p = 0.033) and 13 (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.02-4.40; p = 0.043) was higher in moderate than mild EOAD.Conclusion: We confirmed that depressive symptoms differ according to EOAD severity. When assessing depressive symptoms related to dementia progression, we recommend focusing on "hopelessness and ominousness" in very mild EOAD and "unhappiness and dissatisfaction" in mild EOAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]