Search

Background: Legislation outlawing leaded paint in 1978 and tetraethyl lead from gasoline in 1992 effectively decreased blood lead levels (BLLs), but the effects of lead are still felt in the United States to this day. There is no safe level of lead in the body, and even low level lead exposure can lead to cognitive and developmental delays such as learning delay and disabilities; low IQ; and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The CDC has determined that a BLL of 5 μg/dL or higher is cause for environmental and educational intervention. Today, the EPA estimates that there are approximately 24 million housing units containing significant lead hazards, with 4 million being home to children. Many of the families that are faced with lead hazards in their homes are minorities and low socioeconomic status. To assist families with possible lead hazards in the home, interim controls of lead hazards may be paramount to reducing lead levels in the household in a simple, cost effective manner. Methods: To that end, our research had two aims (a) conduct a systematic literature review to learn about do-it-yourself (DIY) interim controls that are evidence-based and effective in reducing lead hazards in the home and (b) conduct interviews with key personnel at each state health department to learn more about their lead prevention programs and the DIY mitigation strategies recommended to families. Results: Our provisional findings suggest there is an inconsistent, wide range of mitigation strategies recommended by the state health departments that often lack empirical evidence. . While our literature review identified effective interim controls, the literature is outdated. Conclusion and Potential Impact: We recommend more studies are needed to identify cost effective interim controls and the standardization of health department DIY interim controls across the nation.

Background and Hypothesis: The CDC has declared that there is no safe blood lead level for a child, but still approximately 37 million homes are lead-contaminated of which 4 million are home to small children. Lead abatement is an expensive strategy to remove all lead hazards rendering a home lead-free. Many of these lead-contaminated homes are in lower socioeconomic areas which makes lead abatement nearly impossible. Given the expense of lead abatement, low-cost interim controls are needed to reduce lead exposure thus creating a lead-safe home. We hypothesize that updated lead mitigation strategies need pursued, and there is a large disparity of lead information disseminated between health departments. Project Methods: Using JSTOR and Boolean criteria, we conducted a systematic literature review on evidence-based, do-it-yourself (DIY) lead mitigation strategies for sources of lead contamination. Once the literature review was completed, QualtricsR was used to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate the 50 state health department’s websites for lead policy, user friendliness, and recommended lead interim controls as compared to the literature review. Results: Results from the literature indicate that there is a lack of current information regarding new strategies for lead mitigation. Research prior to the year 2000 shows that cleaning flat surfaces by wet mopping, washing hands frequently, mulching, removing shoes before entering the home, and painting over deteriorating paint significantly reduces lead accumulation in the home. Preliminary results from the website review found that there is no baseline of uniform information being distributed, and evidence-based practices are not included for each state health department. Potential Impact: The lack of continuity nationwide for lead mitigation showcases that families are not receiving all of the information that research has to offer to help keep their homes safe. This research indicates that there is a need for national lead policies and recommendations, so each family in the U.S. is equally informed.