Search

Background: The ONCO DVT study demonstrated potential benefits of extended edoxaban treatment in patients with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis in terms of thrombotic risk. However, the risk-benefit balance in patients with anemia remains unclear., Methods and Results: This prespecified subgroup analysis included 601 patients, divided into anemia (n=402) and no-anemia (n=199) groups. The primary endpoint was symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) or VTE-related death. Anemia was defined as hemoglobin <12 g/dL for women and <13 g/dL for men. In the anemia subgroup, the primary endpoint occurred in 3 (1.5%) and 17 (8.4%) patients in the 12- and 3-month edoxaban treatment groups, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.58), compared with 0 and 5 (4.9%) patients, respectively, in the no-anemia subgroup (P interaction=0.997). Major bleeding occurred in 26 (13.1%) and 17 (8.4%) patients with anemia in the 12- and 3-month edoxaban treatment groups, respectively (OR 1.64; 95% CI 0.86-3.14), compared with 2 (2.1%) and 5 (4.9%) patients without anemia (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.26-1.73; P interaction=0.13)., Conclusions: Regardless of the presence of anemia, edoxaban treatment for 12 months was superior to treatment for 3 months in reducing thrombotic events, whereas the risk of major bleeding did not differ significantly between the 2 treatment groups.

Background: Because apolipoprotein-A2 (ApoA2), a key component of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), lacks clear clinical significance, we investigated its impact on cardiovascular events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods and Results: We examined 638 patients who underwent PCI with a new-generation drug-eluting stent for acute or chronic coronary syndrome and had their apolipoprotein levels measured between 2016 and 2021. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the median serum ApoA2 values, and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was assessed. Of the 638 patients, 563 (88%) received statin treatment, with a median serum LDL-C level of 93 mg/dL. Furthermore, 137 patients (21.5%) experienced MACE, and Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the higher ApoA2 group had a significantly lower incidence of MACE than the lower ApoA2 group (30.9% vs. 41.6%). However, the other apolipoproteins, including ApoA1, ApoB, ApoC2, ApoC3, and ApoE, showed no significant differences in MACE. Multivariable Cox hazard analysis indicated that ApoA2 was an independent predictor of MACEs (hazard ratio, 0.666; 95% confidence interval, 0.465-0.954). Furthermore, ApoA2 levels exhibited the strongest inverse association with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (r s =-0.479)., Conclusions: Among all the apolipoproteins, the serum ApoA2 level may be the strongest predictor of future cardiovascular events and prognosis in patients undergoing PCI.

Background: Increased heart rate (HR) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes in chronic heart failure (HF). Ivabradine, anI f inhibitor, improved outcomes in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in the SHIFT study. We evaluated its efficacy and safety in Japanese HFrEF patients in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study: the J-SHIFT study. The main objective was to confirm a hazard ratio of <1 in the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or hospital admission for worsening HF.Methods and Results:Patients with NYHA functional class II-IV, left ventricular EF ≤35%, and resting HR ≥75 beats/min in sinus rhythm under optimal medical therapy received ivabradine (n=127) or placebo (n=127). Mean reduction in resting HR was significantly greater in the ivabradine group (15.2 vs. 6.1 beats/min, P<0.0001). However, symptomatic bradycardia did not occur. A total of 26 (20.5%) patients in the ivabradine group and 37 (29.1%) patients in the placebo group had the primary endpoint event (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.40-1.11, P=0.1179) during median follow-up of 589 days. Mild phosphenes were reported in 8 (6.3%) patients in the ivabradine group and 4 (3.1%) patients in the placebo group (P=0.3760)., Conclusions: The J-SHIFT study supported the efficacy and safety of ivabradine for Japanese HFrEF patients, in accord with the SHIFT study.

Background: Although diuretic resistance leading to residual congestion is a known predictor of a poorer heart failure (HF) prognosis, better therapeutic strategies for effective and safe decongestion have not been established.Methods and Results:In this study, 81 HF patients with fluid retention (despite taking ≥40 mg/day furosemide (FUR)), with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , were randomized into 2 groups and administered either ≤15 mg/day additive tolvaptan (TLV) or ≤40 mg/day increased FUR for 7 days. Changes in urine volume between baseline and mean urine volume during treatment were significantly higher in the TLV than FUR group (P=0.0003). Although there was no significant decrease in body weight or improved signs and symptoms of congestion between the 2 groups, the increase in serum creatinine on Day 7 from baseline was significantly smaller in the TLV than FUR group (P=0.038). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that additive TLV (odds ratio 0.157, 95% confidence interval 0.043-0.605, P=0.001) was an independent clinical factor for improved renal function during treatment compared with increased FUR., Conclusions: In HF patients with residual congestion and renal dysfunction refractory to standard therapy, additive TLV increased urine volume without further renal impairment compared with patients who received an increased dose of FUR.

Background: Elevated heart rate (HR) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes in various cardiac diseases, including heart failure (HF)., Methods and results: Randomized placebo-controlled study was conducted to evaluate the effects of ivabradine, an Ifinhibitor, on the resting HR in 126 Japanese symptomatic HF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, resting HR ≥75 beats/min in sinus rhythm, and stable, optimal background treatment. Patients were randomly allocated into 3 groups: placebo; starting dose of ivabradine 2.5 mg twice daily (BID; 2.5 mg group); 5 mg BID group. The dose was increased up to 7.5 mg BID according to dose-adjustment criteria. After the 6-week treatment, the reductions in resting HR were significant in both the 2.5-mg (16.6±8.1 beats/min) and 5-mg (16.4±9.6 beats/min) groups (P<0.0001 for both groups) compared with placebo (1.7±8.7 beats/min). The most frequent side effect of ivabradine was phosphenes, but all were mild. Treatment was discontinued in 1 patient due to HF in the 5 mg group., Conclusions: Ivabradine starting at 2.5 or 5 mg BID effectively reduced resting HR in Japanese HF patients. Ivabradine at the starting dose of 2.5 mg BID could be safer than 5 mg BID. (Circ J 2016; 80: 668-676).