Search

Aim: The aim of the current study was to compare the esthetic results for subjects with Miller Class I and II gingival recession (GR) abnormalities using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membrane with coronal advanced flaps (CAFs) with and without vertical releasing incisions (VRIs; the envelope-type flap and the flap with VRIs)., Materials and Methods: Seven defects from each of the test and control groups made up of fourteen defects total. In the test group, PRF + CAF was performed without VRI, while in the control group, VRI was used. Gain in root coverage was the main result, with secondary results including papillary bleeding index (PBI), plaque index (PI), relative gingival margin level, relative attachment level, probing pocket depth, recession depth, width of keratinized gingiva (WKG), and gingival thickness. After 3 months of therapy, a clinical evaluation was conducted., Results: No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of recession reduction (2.08 ± 0.5 vs 1.91 ± 0.66 mm), clinical attachment level (CAL) gain (2.08 ± 0.5 vs 1.91 ± 0.66 mm), and increase in WKG (2.66 ± 0.88 vs 2.58 ± 0.51 mm) for test and control groups, respectively., Conclusion: For the treatment of GR, both groups are efficient. However, the CAF + PRF without VRI group showed higher patient compliance and lower postoperative morbidity., Clinical Relevance: The PRF membrane with CAF with or without VRI provide effective treatment option for GR. CAF + PRF without VRI is easy to perform and has less postoperative complications.

Background and Aim: Current treatment of gingival recession (GR) is limited to surgical procedures. We describe a case series of 18 patients with GR who were treated with a botanical patch and rinse following standard conservative therapy. CASE SERIES DESCRIPTION: A total of 22 sites with GR > 1 mm were studied. Following scaling and root planing (SRP) and oral hygiene instruction, patients received two courses of patch treatment (3 days each) and botanical rinse administered twice daily throughout the treatment period. Outcome measures (GR, gingival index (GI) and gingival thickness (GT) were taken at baseline; at 1 to 2 weeks; 2 to 4 weeks; and at 6 to 8 weeks. Miller classifcation and plaque index (PI) were measured at baseline and at 6 to 8 weeks. At the end of the treatment period, mean GR decreased from 4.18 ± 1.74 mm to 3.31 ± 1.51 mm (20.8%); Miller grade from 1.86 ± 0.56 to 1.06 ± 0.43; GI scores from 1.45 ± 0.63 to 0.17 ± 0.38 (88.3%); and PI scores from 1.33 ± 0.59 to 0.78 ± 0.94. GT increased from 0.74 mm ± 0.40 to 1.21 ± 0.39 (63.5%). No adverse effects were reported with either the patch or rinse treatments., Conclusion: We observed a decrease in GR and GI scores in 18 patients (22 sites) treated with the study patch and rinse, with increased GT., Clinical Significance: A combined botanical patch-rinse treatment may be effective as adjuvant treatment to standard conservative care for GR. Further research is needed to verify these fndings.

Aim: Diabetic patients have more severe periodontal destruction, but periodontal therapy can improve metabolic control. Recently, interest has focused on the use of subantimicrobial dose doxycycline (SDD) as a treatment paradigm. Therefore, this study was undertaken to evaluate clinical efficacy of SDD with scaling and root planning (SRP) in chronic periodontitis patients with diabetes., Methods and Materials: Twenty chronic periodontitis patients with diabetes mellitus were randomly allocated to either a test and a control group. Clinical measurements were recorded at baseline and at six months for probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and gingival recession (GR). After SRP, patients in the test group were instructed to take SDD 20-mg capsules twice a day while patients in the control group took a placebo twice a day. Both groups were on this regimen for a six-month period., Results: A greater reduction in mean PPD was demonstrated in patients in the test group compared to the control group. The mean CAL increase observed in the test group was significantly greater (0.67 mm) than that in the control group., Conclusion: It can be concluded that SRP, in conjunction with the SDD therapy described, is more effective then SRP alone in terms of CAL gain and PPD reduction in diabetic patients with severe periodontal disease., Clinical Significance: Given the widespread prevalence of both chronic periodontitis and diabetes, the proposed treatment approach will prove to be of great value and contribute significantly to the overall health of the patients.