Search

Background: The exponential growth of telehealth is revolutionizing health care delivery, but its evaluation has not matched the pace of its uptake. Various forms of assessment, from single-item to more extensive questionnaires, have been used to assess telehealth and digital therapeutics and their usability. The most frequently used questionnaire is the "Telehealth Usability Questionnaire" (TUQ). The use of the TUQ is limited by its restricted availability in languages other than English and its feasibility., Objective: The aims of this study were to create a translated German TUQ version and to derive a short questionnaire for patients-"Telehealth Usability and Perceived Usefulness Short Questionnaire for patients" (TUUSQ)., Methods: As a first step, the original 21-item TUQ was forward and back-translated twice. In the second step, 13 TUQ items were selected for their suitability for the general evaluation of telehealth on the basis of expert opinion. These 13 items were surveyed between July 2022 and September 2023 in 4 studies with patients and family members of palliative care, as well as patients with chronic autoimmune diseases, evaluating 13 health care apps, including digital therapeutics and a telehealth system (n1=128, n2=220, n3=30, and n4=12). Psychometric exploratory factor analysis was conducted., Results: The analysis revealed that a parsimonious factor structure with 2 factors ("perceived usefulness in health care" and "usability") is sufficient to describe the patient's perception. Consequently, the questionnaire could be shortened to 6 items without compromising its informativeness., Conclusions: We provide a linguistically precise German version of the TUQ for assessing the usability and perceived usefulness of telehealth. Beyond that, we supply a highly feasible shortened version that is versatile for general use in telehealth, mobile health, and digital therapeutics, which distinguishes between the 2 factors "perceived usefulness in health care" and "usability" in patients., Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00030546; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00030546., (©Jannik Zimmermann, Harriet Morf, Florian Scharf, Johannes Knitza, Heidi Moeller, Felix Muehlensiepen, Michaela Nathrath, Till Orlemann, Thomas Voelker, Merlin Deckers. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 21.11.2024.)

Background: Patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) frequently need long-term medical treatment. Mobile apps promise to complement and improve IBD management, but so far there has been no scientific analysis of their quality., Objective: This study evaluated the quality of German mobile apps targeting IBD patients and physicians treating IBD patients using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS)., Methods: The German Apple App Store and Google Play Store were systematically searched to identify German IBD mobile apps for patient and physician use. MARS was used by 6 physicians (3 using Android smartphones and 3 using iPhones) to independently assess app quality. Apps were randomly assigned so that the 4 apps with the most downloads were rated by all raters and the remaining apps were rated by 1 Android and 1 iOS user., Results: In total, we identified 1764 apps in the Apple App Store and Google Play Store. After removing apps that were not related to IBD (n=1386) or not available in German (n=317), 61 apps remained. After removing duplicates (n=3) and apps for congresses (n=7), journals (n=4), and clinical studies (n=6), as well as excluding apps that were available in only 1 of the 2 app stores (n=20) and apps that could only be used with an additional device (n=7), we included a total of 14 apps. The app "CED Dokumentation und Tipps" had the highest overall median MARS score at 4.11/5. On the whole, the median MARS scores of the 14 apps ranged between 2.38/5 and 4.11/5. As there was no significant difference between iPhone and Android raters, we used the Wilcoxon comparison test to calculate P values., Conclusions: The MARS ratings showed that the quality of German IBD apps varied. We also discovered a discrepancy between app store ratings and MARS ratings, highlighting the difficulty of assessing perceived app quality. Despite promising results from international studies, there is little evidence for the clinical benefits of German IBD apps. Clinical studies and patient inclusion in the app development process are needed to effectively implement mobile apps in routine care., (©Maximilian Gerner, Nicolas Vuillerme, Timothée Aubourg, Eva-Maria Messner, Yannik Terhorst, Verena Hörmann, Ingo Ganzleben, Hannah Schenker, Georg Schett, Raja Atreya, Markus F Neurath, Johannes Knitza, Till Orlemann. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 03.05.2022.)