Search

Background: BRAF and MEK inhibitors have changed the landscape of treatment for advanced melanoma. Among their side effects, panniculitis has been hypothesized to be associated with better survival., Objectives: In this study, we aimed to explore the association between the occurrence of panniculitis during targeted therapy and outcome of metastatic melanoma., Materials & Methods: This was a retrospective single-centre comparative study from 2014 to 2019. An English literature review was also conducted to further our understanding of the mechanism(s) involved and identify characteristics of this association, in order to support better management., Results: Ten patients who developed panniculitis during treatment were matched to 26 controls based on potential confounders at treatment introduction. The prevalence of panniculitis was 5.3%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 8.5 months (range: 3.0-94.0). The median PFS for the group with panniculitis was 10.5 months (7.0-undefined) and 7.0 months (6.0-32.0) for controls (p=0.39). According to the scientific literature, panniculitis occurring during targeted therapy affects mainly young people, predominantly women, with variable delay to onset (with half reported cases occurring in the first month). In addition, panniculitis usually only affects the lower limbs or is associated with other clinical signs (fever, arthralgia), without histological specificity. Discontinuation of targeted therapy is not required as spontaneous remission is usually experienced. Symptomatic treatment may be administered but systemic corticosteroids have not been proven to be effective., Conclusion: In contrast to the belief that there is a link between panniculitis and clinical response to targeted therapy according to the literature, our results show that there is no significant association between the two.

Background: Melanoma is one of the most fatal forms of skin cancer. Defining relevant biomarkers to predict treatment outcome based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is needed in order to increase overall survival of metastatic melanoma patients (MM)., Objectives: This study compared different machine learning models in terms of performance to identify biomarkers from clinical diagnosis and follow-up of MM patients, to predict treatment response to ICIs under real-life conditions., Materials & Methods: Clinical data from melanoma patients with an AJCC status of III C/D or IV, having received ICIs, were extracted from the RIC-MEL database for this pilot study. Light Gradient Boosting Machine, linear regression, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine and Extreme Gradient Boosting were compared in terms of performance. The SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) method was used to assess the link between the different clinical features investigated and the prediction of response to ICIs., Results: RF showed the highest scores for accuracy (0.63) and sensitivity (0.64) and high scores for precision (0.61) and specificity (0.63). AJCC stage (0.076) showed the highest SHAP mean value, thus being the most suitable feature to predict response to treatment. The number of metastatic sites per year (0.049), number of months since first treatment initiation and the Breslow index (both 0.032) were less predictive, but still showed relatively high predictive power., Conclusion: This machine learning approach confirms that a certain number of biomarkers may enable prediction of treatment success with ICIs.

Background: Skin phototype, latitude and sun exposure are classic risk factors for melanomas but are not relevant to acrolentiginous melanomas (ALM). ALM is not related to chronic sun exposure because the thick stratum corneum acts as a barrier to penetration of UV rays, whereas LMM occurs in skin with high photoaging due to chronic sun exposure., Objectives: This study aimed to determine if any difference exists between "solar" melanomas and "non-solar" melanomas based on a comparison between LMM and ALM., Materials & Methods: We extracted all data for ALM and LMM patients, from March 2012 to September 2020, from the RIC-Mel national database to perform a descriptive cohort analysis of 1,056 Caucasian cases., Conclusion: The profiles of solar-related and non-solar melanoma seem to be different, and prognostic factors of ALM at diagnosis are less favourable compared to LMM, suggesting that non-solar melanoma is more aggressive than solar-related melanoma and that sentinel lymph node biopsy should be performed.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved the management of metastatic melanoma, however, we have witnessed an emergence of adverse cardiac events such as myocarditis., Objectives: We first aimed to assess the prevalence of adverse cardiac events in patients treated with anti-PD-1 for metastatic melanoma. Our second objective was to determine the role of troponin monitoring in the diagnosis of these events., Materials & Methods: We retrospectively analysed the prevalence of patients treated with anti-PD-1 in a real-life setting based on a cohort of 183 patients. We then performed a prospective cohort, in which clinical and biological profiles of patients were collected, along with monthly monitoring of troponin levels., Results: The prevalence of adverse cardiac events in the retrospective cohort was 2.2%, with three cases of myocarditis and one of myocardial infarction. In the prospective cohort, 14/52 patients had an abnormal baseline troponin T level. All patients had a history of cardiac or vascular complaints. Six patients showed an increase in troponin T level during follow-up, in two patients associated with clinical symptoms., Conclusion: Adverse cardiac events with immunotherapy are both frequent and life-threatening. Troponin T may be of interest to detect early adverse cardiac events before any clinical sign, however, the data supporting this remain to be confirmed.

Background: Targeted therapies such as BRAF and MEK inhibitors and immunotherapies have been made available to treat melanoma., Objectives: To provide an overview of the management of the French Stage III melanoma population after complete lymph node resection prior to new adjuvant therapies., Materials and Methods: A subgroup data analysis., Results: Data from 1,835 patients were analysed (15.58% Stage IIIA, 39.24% Stage IIIB, 43.92% Stage IIIC and 1.25% Stage IIID). Superficial spreading melanoma was the most frequent (70.98% in Stage IIIA for whom mutation analysis was performed; BRAF mutation was identified in up to 62% Stage IIIA patients). Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 88.46% of Stage IIIA patients, 42.36% of Stage IIIB, 53.97% of Stage IIIC and 34.78% of Stage IIID. Up to 80% of Stage IIIA patients had no adjuvant treatment follow-up. Ulceration (p = 0.004; RR: 2.98; 95% CI: 1.4-6.3) and age at diagnosis (p = 0.0002; RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.06) were significant predictive factors for survival. Adjuvant interferon-α was administered in up to 13.04% of Stage IIID patients., Conclusion: Only a small number of Stage III melanoma patients were treated with interferon-α in adjuvant settings. New adjuvant therapies are currently having an effect on clinical practice in France, increasing survival and decreasing cost.

Background: Anti-PD1 antibodies have revolutionized the management of patients with advanced melanoma. In clinical trials, the efficacy of nivolumab is being tested in selected populations of patients., Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with advanced melanoma under real-life conditions., Materials and Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted in patients treated with nivolumab for advanced melanoma included in the RIC-Mel network. Overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Eighty-seven patients were included with a median follow-up of 31 months. The median PFS was 13 months (95% CI: 7-28). Objective response rate was 33.3%. Among patients achieving a complete response, the response was maintained after treatment discontinuation in 80.7% of patients for a median duration of 21.7 months. Multivariate analysis showed that an increased lactate dehydrogenase level (p = 0.03; HR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.02-1.45) and brain metastases (p = 0.024; HR: 2.78; 95% CI: 1.14-6.77) were correlated with a decrease in PFS. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were found in 10.3% of patients., Conclusion: Based on our study, the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with advanced melanoma are consistent with previously published data.

For melanoma patients, surgery is a standard treatment for locoregional skin metastasis (LSM). To assess the frequency and risk factors for positive margins after excision of LSM and their impact on patient overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A monocentric, retrospective observational study was performed including 87 patients with LSM who had undergone surgical excision. Positive margins were found in 45% of patients after excision. After additional excision, 28% of patients still had positive margins. Interestingly, there was no difference in PFS or OS for clear margins after the first or additional excision or for margins that remained positive without additional excision. LSM size was the only identified predictive factor for positive margins. This is the first reported study investigating the frequency of, and risk factors for positive margins of cutaneous LSM, which raises the question of whether additional excision should be performed following positive margin excision.