Search

Introduction: Blood tests have the potential to improve the accuracy of Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical diagnosis, which will enable greater access to AD-specific treatments. This study compared leading commercial blood tests for amyloid pathology and other AD-related outcomes., Methods: Plasma samples from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative were assayed with AD blood tests from C2N Diagnostics, Fujirebio Diagnostics, ALZPath, Janssen, Roche Diagnostics, and Quanterix. Outcomes measures were amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), tau PET, cortical thickness, and dementia severity. Logistic regression models assessed the classification accuracies of individual or combined plasma biomarkers for binarized outcomes, and Spearman correlations evaluated continuous relationships between individual plasma biomarkers and continuous outcomes., Results: Measures of plasma p-tau217, either individually or in combination with other plasma biomarkers, had the strongest relationships with all AD outcomes., Discussion: This study identified the plasma biomarker analytes and assays that most accurately classified amyloid pathology and other AD-related outcomes., Highlights: Plasma p-tau217 measures most accurately classified amyloid and tau status. Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 had relatively low accuracy in classification of amyloid status. Plasma p-tau217 measures had higher correlations with cortical thickness than NfL. Correlations of plasma biomarkers with dementia symptoms were relatively low., (© 2024 The Author(s). Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.) more...

Introduction: Screening potential participants in Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials with amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) is often time consuming and expensive., Methods: A web-based application was developed to model the time and financial cost of screening for AD clinical trials. Four screening approaches were compared; three approaches included an AD blood test at different stages of the screening process., Results: The traditional screening approach using only amyloid PET was the most time consuming and expensive. Incorporating an AD blood test at any point in the screening process decreased both the time and financial cost of trial enrollment. Improvements in AD blood test accuracy over currently available tests only marginally increased savings. Use of a high specificity cut-off may improve the feasibility of screening with only an AD blood test., Discussion: Incorporating AD blood tests into screening for AD clinical trials may reduce the time and financial cost of enrollment., Highlights: The time and cost of enrolling participants in Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials were modeled. A web-based application was developed to enable evaluation of key parameters. AD blood tests may decrease the time and financial cost of clinical trial enrollment. Improvements in AD blood test accuracy only marginally increased savings. Use of a high specificity cut-off may enable screening with only an AD blood test., (© 2022 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.) more...

Objective: To determine whether the extent of overlap of the genetic architecture among the sporadic late-onset Alzheimer's Disease (sLOAD), familial late-onset AD (fLOAD), sporadic early-onset AD (sEOAD), and autosomal dominant early-onset AD (eADAD)., Methods: Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) were constructed using previously identified 21 genome-wide significant loci for LOAD risk., Results: We found that there is an overlap in the genetic architecture among sEOAD, fLOAD, and sLOAD. The highest association of the PRS and risk (odds ratio [OR] = 2.27; P = 1.29 × 10 -7 ) was observed in sEOAD, followed by fLOAD (OR = 1.75; P = 1.12 × 10 -7 ) and sLOAD (OR = 1.40; P = 1.21 × 10 -3 ). The PRS was associated with cerebrospinal fluid ptau 181 -Aβ 42 on eADAD (P = 4.36 × 10 -2 )., Conclusion: Our analysis confirms that the genetic factors identified for LOAD modulate risk in sLOAD and fLOAD and also sEOAD cohorts. Specifically, our results suggest that the burden of these risk variants is associated with familial clustering and earlier onset of AD. Although these variants are not associated with risk in the eADAD, they may be modulating age at onset., (Copyright © 2017 the Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) more...