Search

Objective: To analyze the outcomes of static computer-aided implant placement (sCAIP) compared to partially guided (PGIP) and free-handed (FHIP) implant placement., Material and Methods: This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019131397). A comprehensive literature search was performed by two independent examiners. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected. Treatment modalities included sCAIP, PGIP, and FHIP. Data pertaining to the outcomes of interest were extracted. Random-effects meta-analyses were feasible for a subset of outcomes., Results: From an initial list of 2,870 records, fourteen articles for a total of ten RCTs were selected. Data from 7 of these studies allowed for the conduction of three meta-analyses comparing accuracy of implant placement across modalities. Survival rate up to 12 months post-loading was high (>98%) and comparable between treatments (low-quality evidence). No tangible differences in terms of patient perception of intra- or postoperative discomfort were observed (low-quality evidence). Quantitative analyses revealed significantly lower angular (MD = 4.41°, 95% CI 3.99-4.83, p < .00001), coronal (MD = 0.65 mm, 95% CI 0.50-0.79, p < .00001), and apical (MD = 1.13 mm, 95% CI 0.92-1.34, p < .00001) deviation values for sCAIP as compared to FHIP (8 studies, 383 patients, 878 implants, high-quality evidence). A similar discrepancy, in favor of sCAIP, was observed for angular deviation only as compared to PGIP (MD = 2.11°, 95% CI 1.06-3.16, p < .00001)., Conclusions: sCAIP is associated with superior accuracy compared to PGIP and FHIP., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of measuring peri-implant buccal bone when using three different computed tomography devices., Materials and Methods: Sixty tissue-level or bone-level dental implants were placed in bovine ribs with either buccal bone full coverage, dehiscence or fenestration. For each site, the distance from the bone defect to the implant neck and the buccal bone thickness 1 mm apical to the crest were measured using a calliper. Subsequently, all sites were scanned in a reproducible position using a multi-slice computed tomography (CT) (Brightspeed, voxel size 0.625 mm) and two cone-beam computed tomography devices (i-CAT NG, voxel size 0.3 mm and Newtom VGi, voxel size 0.2 mm). Bone thickness was measured on images from the three systems similar to direct measurements and differences were evaluated. Factors that could influence the buccal bone identification were assessed by multiple binary logistic regression., Results: Buccal bone ranged from 0.1 mm to 2.75 mm in thickness and was not visible in 68%, 63% and 60% of cases when using CT, i-CAT and Newtom, respectively. For each mm of bone thickness increment, the odds of radiographic identification increased by 30.6 (P < 0.001). Bone defects negatively affected radiographic visibility (P < 0.05). All devices underestimated bone dimensions although differences among them were not significant., Conclusions: Within these experimental conditions, the investigated devices have equivalent low accuracy in diagnosing peri-implant buccal bone. Accuracy was significantly influenced by buccal bone thickness, especially if <1 mm, and in presence of peri-implant marginal defects., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: This study tested the hypothesis of no differences in resonance frequency for standardized amounts of simulated bone-implant contact around implants with different diameters. In addition, it was evaluated if resonance frequency is able to detect a difference between stable and rotation mobile ("spinning") implants., Material and Methods: Implants with diameters of 3.3, 4.1 and 4.8 mm were placed in a purposely designed metal mould where liquid polyurethane resin was then poured to obtain a simulated bone-implant specimen. By regulating the mould, it was possible to create the following simulated bone-implant contact groups: 3.3 mm (198.6 mm(2)); 4.1 mm (198.8 mm(2)); 4.8 mm (200.2 mm(2)); 4.8 mm (231.7 mm(2)); 4.8 mm (294.7 mm(2)). Each group included 10 specimens. After resin setting, resonance frequency was measured. On the last group, measurements were repeated after establishing implant rotational mobility. One-way ANOVA tests with post hoc comparisons, a Pearson's correlation coefficient and a t-test for repeated measurements were used to evaluate statistically significant differences., Results: Implants with different diameters but with the same amount of simulated osseointegration revealed no differences in resonance frequency. On the contrary, an increase of simulated bone-implant contact resulted in significantly higher resonance frequency. A clear direct linear correlation resulted between resonance frequency and simulated bone-implant contact. Furthermore, a significant difference resulted between resonance frequency measured before and after creation of rotational mobility., Conclusions: Within the conditions of this study, the secondary stability was correlated with the simulated bone-implant contact. In addition, resonance frequency was able to discern between stable and rotation mobile implants., (© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: To evaluate, on the base of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) fractal dimension, bone quality changes surrounding the apical portion of immediate implants placed under higher insertion torque utilizing an undersized drilling technique., Materials and Methods: Three patients were enrolled in this study. Single implants were placed into fresh extraction sockets in the anterior maxilla and provisionalized immediately. Adequate stability was ensured on all the implants by a 28.5% undersizing of the apical portion of the osteotomy. Bone quality at the most apical 1.15 mm peri-implant bone portion were measured by CBCT at placement and after 6 months. This analysis was carried out by evaluating the box counting fractal dimension of 15 consecutive CBCT slices related to the most apical part of each implant., Results: All the three implants were successful after an 18-month follow-up period. The mean fractal dimension at the implant apex exhibited a 3% increase 6 months following placement., Conclusions: Within the limitations of an explorative study, an undersized drilling resulting in high insertion torque would seem to induce no adverse changes in radiographic bone quality after 6 months of follow-up. The most favorable entity of drilling undersizing and its effect on peri-implant bone remodeling, should be evaluated on a larger patient population., (© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.)