Search

Purpose: A deformable registration method capable of accounting for missing tissue (e.g., excision) is reported for application in cone-beam CT (CBCT)-guided surgical procedures. Excisions are identified by a segmentation step performed simultaneous to the registration process. Tissue excision is explicitly modeled by increasing the dimensionality of the deformation field to allow motion beyond the dimensionality of the image. The accuracy of the model is tested in phantom, simulations, and cadaver models., Methods: A variant of the Demons deformable registration algorithm is modified to include excision segmentation and modeling. Segmentation is performed iteratively during the registration process, with initial implementation using a threshold-based approach to identify voxels corresponding to "tissue" in the moving image and "air" in the fixed image. With each iteration of the Demons process, every voxel is assigned a probability of excision. Excisions are modeled explicitly during registration by increasing the dimensionality of the deformation field so that both deformations and excisions can be accounted for by in- and out-of-volume deformations, respectively. The out-of-volume (i.e., fourth) component of the deformation field at each voxel carries a magnitude proportional to the excision probability computed in the excision segmentation step. The registration accuracy of the proposed "extra-dimensional" Demons (XDD) and conventional Demons methods was tested in the presence of missing tissue in phantom models, simulations investigating the effect of excision size on registration accuracy, and cadaver studies emulating realistic deformations and tissue excisions imparted in CBCT-guided endoscopic skull base surgery., Results: Phantom experiments showed the normalized mutual information (NMI) in regions local to the excision to improve from 1.10 for the conventional Demons approach to 1.16 for XDD, and qualitative examination of the resulting images revealed major differences: the conventional Demons approach imparted unrealistic distortions in areas around tissue excision, whereas XDD provided accurate "ejection" of voxels within the excision site and maintained the registration accuracy throughout the rest of the image. Registration accuracy in areas far from the excision site (e.g., > ∼5 mm) was identical for the two approaches. Quantitation of the effect was consistent in analysis of NMI, normalized cross-correlation (NCC), target registration error (TRE), and accuracy of voxels ejected from the volume (true-positive and false-positive analysis). The registration accuracy for conventional Demons was found to degrade steeply as a function of excision size, whereas XDD was robust in this regard. Cadaver studies involving realistic excision of the clivus, vidian canal, and ethmoid sinuses demonstrated similar results, with unrealistic distortion of anatomy imparted by conventional Demons and accurate ejection and deformation for XDD., Conclusions: Adaptation of the Demons deformable registration process to include segmentation (i.e., identification of excised tissue) and an extra dimension in the deformation field provided a means to accurately accommodate missing tissue between image acquisitions. The extra-dimensional approach yielded accurate "ejection" of voxels local to the excision site while preserving the registration accuracy (typically subvoxel) of the conventional Demons approach throughout the rest of the image. The ability to accommodate missing tissue volumes is important to application of CBCT for surgical guidance (e.g., skull base drillout) and may have application in other areas of CBCT guidance.

Purpose: As cone-beam CT (CBCT) systems dedicated to various imaging specialties proliferate, technical assessment grounded in imaging physics is important to ensuring that image quality and radiation dose are quantified, understood, and justified. This paper involves technical assessment of a new CBCT scanner (CS 9300, Carestream Health, Rochester, NY) dedicated to imaging of the ear and sinuses for applications in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS). The results guided evaluation of technique protocols to minimize radiation dose in a manner sufficient for OHNS imaging tasks., Methods: The technical assessment focused on the imaging performance and radiation dose for each of seven technique protocols recommended by the manufacturer: three sinus protocols and four ear (temporal bone) protocols. Absolute dose was measured using techniques adapted from AAPM Task Group Report No. 111, involving three stacked 16 cm diameter acrylic cylinders (CTDI phantoms) and a 0.6 cm(3) Farmer ionization chamber to measure central and peripheral dose. The central dose (D(o)) was also measured as a function of longitudinal position (z) within and beyond the primary radiation field to assess, for example, out-of-field dose to the neck. Signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) and Hounsfield unit (HU) accuracy were assessed in a commercially available quality assurance phantom (CATPHAN module CTP404, The Phantom Laboratory, Greenwich, NY) and a custom phantom with soft-tissue-simulating plastic inserts (Gammex RMI, Madison, WI). Spatial resolution was assessed both qualitatively (a line-pair pattern, CATPHAN module CTP528) and quantitatively (modulation transfer function, MTF, measured with a wire phantom). Imaging performance pertinent to various OHNS imaging tasks was qualitatively assessed using an anthropomorphic phantom as evaluated by two experienced OHNS specialists., Results: The technical assessment motivated a variety of modifications to the manufacturer-specified protocols to provide reduced radiation dose without compromising pertinent task-based imaging performance. The revised protocols yielded D(o) ranging 2.9-5.7 mGy, representing a ∼30% reduction in dose from the original technique chart. Out-of-field dose was ∼10% of D(o) at a distance of ∼8 cm from the field edge. Soft-tissue contrast resolution was fairly limited (water-brain SDNR ∼0.4-0.7) while high-contrast performance was reasonably good (SDNR ∼2-4 for a polystyrene insert in the CATPHAN). The scanner does not demonstrate (or claim to provide) accurate HU and exhibits a systematic error in CT number that could potentially be addressed by further calibration. The spatial resolution is ∼10-16 lp∕cm as assessed in a line-pair phantom, with MTF exceeding 10% out to ∼20 lp∕cm. Qualitative assessment by expert readers suggested limited soft-tissue visibility but excellent high-contrast (bone) visualization with isotropic spatial resolution suitable to a broad spectrum of pertinent sinus and temporal bone imaging tasks., Conclusions: The CBCT scanner provided spatial and contrast resolution suitable to visualization of high-contrast morphology in sinus, maxillofacial, and otologic imaging applications. Rigorous technical assessment guided revision of technique protocols to reduce radiation dose while maintaining image quality sufficient for pertinent imaging tasks. The scanner appears well suited to high-contrast sinus and temporal bone imaging at doses comparable to or less than that reported for conventional diagnostic CT of the head.