Search

Introduction: An incision is a slit or cut used to get access to deeper tissues. Electro cautery is a medical procedure that involves burning a specific portion of the body to remove or close it. Although worries of severe scarring and slower wound healing have limited its use for skin incision, electro-cautery is becoming increasingly often used for tissue dissection. Materials and methods: In this prospective randomised study, 60 patients undergoing mesh plasty for inguinal hernia were divided into two groups. In Group A, a skin incision is produced using electrocautery, while Group B uses a scalpel. The two groups are compared in terms of postoperative discomfort, wound complications, and the use of analgesics. Finally, the Mann-Whitney U Test is used to assess and compare the results for the two groups. Results: Pain will be measured six, twelve, and twenty-four hours after surgery using a graphical visual analogue scale. In the event that the pain score exceeds 4, INJ.DICLOFENAC 50 mg IM will be administered. In the post-operative phase, complications recorded in hospital stay are quantified by means of Seroma-discharge of serous collection at suture site, and Hematoma-blood collection. Conclusion: The outcomes of both groups, namely the diathermy and Scalpel groups, have been proven to be equivalent based on the findings of this research of the following: 1) postoperative pain, 2) the need for analgesics, and 3) wound complications after surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Indeed, even extreme inguinal hernia fix is among the commonest activities in everyday medical procedure, the decision for an ideal methodology repeat rates and low commonness of entanglements, strain free lattice increased activity has become the standard strategy in inguinal hernia medical procedure, altogether diminishing hernia repeat rates. Materia & Methods: Study conducted on 110 patients admitted in MGM Medical & M.Y. Hospital Indore. Total 110 consecutive patients who will undergo inguinal hernia repair at the Surgical Department & who fulfills the inclusion criteria were included. Clinical details, rate of post-op wound infection and post-op pain were noted. Observation & Results:-Total 110 patients enrolled in study most patients belonging to 51-65 years of age. Total 76 patients managed by suture fixation and 34 patients managed by Progrip mesh. Most patients found to have moderate pain. Wound infection rate came out to be 13%.Conclusion: The point of our investigation is to think about the result after Lichtenstein's inguinal hernia fix utilizing ordinary lattice v/s self-focusing Pro grasp network. The essential endpoint of the examination will be the occurrence of post-operative pain. Open Inguinal hernioplasty utilizing Self Gripping Mesh (Pro hold) has better result as far as usable time, Post-usable torment, Hospital stay, Early re-visitation of expert life and ongoing agony. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and objectives: Inguinal hernia repair is the most frequently performed operation in any general surgical unit. Reports on the outcome of inguinal hernia surgery show that recurrence rate 5 years after operation can vary from 0.1 to over 20%. The aim of the present study is to compare Lichtenstein’s tension free hernia repair with the Modified Bassini’s herniorraphy in terms of immediate complications like technical difficulty, seroma formation, wound infection rate, recurrence rate at one year and chronic pain. Methods:100 cases admitted to BELAGAVI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES BELGAVI DISTRICT HOSPITAL from June 2021 to May 2022 with primary unilateral inguinal hernia were randomly subjected either to Modified Bassini’s herniorraphy or Lichtenstein hernioplasty. All the hernia repairs were performed under spinal anaesthesia. In case, of any associated conditions like hypertension, diabetes mellitus were present, treatment was first given for these associated conditions. A note was taken of any technical difficulty during surgery.The patients were followed in the surgical OPD at 1 month, 6 months and 1 year for time taken to return to normal activities, chronic groin pain, patient’s satisfaction and recurrence. Results:Technical difficulty was encountered in 4 patients (i.e. 8%) undergoing Modified Bassini’s herniorraphy. No technical difficulty was encountered in any of the patients in Lichtenstein group. At 1 month follow up, 20 patients (i.e. 40%) of Modified Bassini’s herniorraphy group patients had mild pain whereas 14 patients (i.e. 28%) had mild pain in the Lichtenstein group. However, none of the patients in X any of the two groups had any degree of pain at 6 months and 1 year. There was one recurrence (i.e. 2%) in Modified Bassini’s herniorraphy. However, no recurrence was seen in Lichtenstein group. Time to return to work was relatively shorter in Lichtenstein group. Interpretation and Conclusion: Lichtenstein is a easy, straightforward technique for inguinal hernia repair with fewer recurrences, less hospital stay and less duration of surgery. However, amongst the pure tissue repairs Modified Bassini’s herniorraphy still remains relevant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]