Search

Background: Primary chemotherapy as part of multidisciplinary approach is the established treatment for inoperable stage III B breast cancer. The primary endpoints were conversion to operable disease and feasibility of conservative surgery (breast-conserving therapy: BCT); secondary were clinical and pathological complete response rate, local and distant control and safety of the primary regimen., Methods: Between 1998 and 2001, 40 inoperable breast cancer patients < or =60 years, 72% T4abc and 28% T4d, received 6 cycles of primary PEV dose-dense regimen: cisplatin 50 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2, i.v. (q 14). Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) or BCT was performed, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormone therapy., Results: All patients were converted to operable disease, and BCT was feasible in 24% of T4abc patients. After a median follow-up of 84 months (range 58-96), local and distant relapses were 7.5% (0% in BCT ) and 25% (25% in BCT), respectively. Clinical response was 80% (clinical complete response [cCR]: 20%); pathological complete response (pCR) was 40% in breast, 50% in axilla (pLN0); 32% both in breast and axilla. Neutropenia (G4, 30%), leukopenia (G4, 25%), alopecia (G2, 100%), nausea and vomiting (G4, 20%) were the most common toxicities., Conclusions: The PEV dose-dense regimen seems to be highly effective in terms of resectability and pCR. Toxicity, mainly hematological, was acceptable. Successful BCT is feasible, in selected patients, without compromising local and distant control., (Copyright 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Purpose: The present study was aimed at defining the antitumor activity of the cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel (PET) weekly administration with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support in chemonaive small-cell lung cancer patients with extensive disease (ED-SCLC)., Methods: Chemonaive ED-SCLC patients received cisplatin 30 mg/sqm, epirubicin 50 mg/sqm and paclitaxel 120 mg/sqm, weekly, with G-CSF (5 microg/kg from day 3 to 5) support, for a maximum of 12 weeks., Results: Thirty-nine patients were treated, for a total of 354 cycles delivered. Eight complete (21%), and 22 partial responses (56%) were recorded, giving a 77% (95% CI = 61-89%) objective response rate (ORR). After 14 (range, 7-28)-month median follow-up, 24 deaths have occurred. Median progression-free and overall survival were 7 months and 11 months, with 1- and 2-year projected survivals of 45 and 24%, respectively. No toxic deaths occurred. Grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 4 (10%) and 1 (3%) patients, respectively. Only one case of neutropenic sepsis was recorded, while hemorrhagic thrombocytopenia was never observed. Emesis, loss of appetite, mucositis and fatigue were the main nonhematological toxicities, being severe in 9, 8, 4 and 7 patients, respectively., Conclusions: The weekly PET combination with G-CSF support represents an active therapeutic approach in chemonaive ED-SCLC patients. However, both ORR and median survival does not seem substantially better than those achievable with a standard regimen. In view of that, and in consideration of the relevant nonhematological toxicity, this approach should not be pursued outside clinical trials., (Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: To test the clinical activity and toxicity profile of the combination regimen of vinorelbine and cisplatin in a series of patients with carcinoma of the cervix uteri with de novo metastatic disease or recurrent disease after previous therapy. The main aims of the study included analysis of objective response rates, toxicity, and time to progression., Patients and Methods: Forty-two eligible patients were enrolled into the trial and treated with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 8. This regimen was repeated every 21 days upon resolution of toxicity for 3 cycles before response assessment. Enrolled patients had a median age of 53 years, a median ECOG performance status of 1, and mostly a squamous cell histology (86%). Sixteen patients (38%) were treatment-naive since first diagnosed with widespread metastatic disease, 7% had only previous surgery, 31% radiotherapy, and 24% both radiation and surgical therapy. In previously radiated patients, 21% of patients had disease only within the radiation fields, 21% only outside the radiation fields, and 12% both inside and outside the radiotherapy portals., Results: All patients were evaluable for response analysis. A complete response was achieved in 5 patients (12%), and a partial response in 15 cases (36%) for an overall response rate of 48% (95% CL 22-52%). Patients with recurrent disease within the previous radiation field (including those also with disease outside the radiation fields) showed a 28% overall response rate with no complete response, while patients with disease previously untreated with radiotherapy or with tumour deposits only outside of ratiation portals yielded a 57% overall response rate with a 18% complete response rate. Only 1 out of 8 patients with performance status 2 showed a major response (12%). Median time to progression was 5.6 months (range 2.0-14 months). The median overall survival of the whole series was 9.1 months. Hematological toxicity was the most frequent side-effect. Grade 3 vomiting was recorded in 9 patients (21%), and mild mucositis in 14% of patients. Grade 3 neutropenia was observed in 21% of patients, while grade 4 in 12% of cases with neutropenic fever was seen in 4 cases. Sixteen patients (38%) complained of grade 1-2 constipation, while grade 1-2 peripheral neuropathy was seen in 8 patients (19%)., Conclusions: The results achieved in this trial suggest that the combination regimen of vinorelbine and cisplatin may be safely given to patients with metastatic and/or recurrent carcinoma of the uterine cervix. This regimen is active at least in terms of objective response rates. Although satisfactory results are still lacking, these results suggest that the vinorelbine-cisplatin regimen is worthy of further studies and may represent the basis for the development of new active regimens., (Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel)

Objective: This study was designed to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of gemcitabine plus docetaxel, both given on a weekly schedule, in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC)., Methods: Heavily pretreated patients with MBC, aged 18-75 years with World Health Organization performance status of 0-2 were enrolled. Three escalating weekly doses of docetaxel (30, 35 and 40 mg/m(2)) followed by a weekly fixed dose of gemcitabine, 800 mg/m(2), were administered on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) included grade > 3 hematologic toxicity and grade > 2 stomatitis, asthenia, diarrhea or organ-specific toxicity (except alopecia). Dose escalation was stopped if > or = 3 of 5 patients at any dose level experienced DLT., Results: Eighteen patients (median age 56 years) received a mean of 4.1 (range 1-6) cycles. Asthenia, stomatitis and leukopenia were the main DLTs. One of 5 patients had DLT at dose level 1 and 2 of 5 patients at dose level 2. At dose level 3, 3 of 5 patients had DLTs. Three additional patients treated at dose level 3 confirmed that the MTD had been reached. Therefore, the recommended docetaxel dose in combination with gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) for phase II studies was established at the next lower dose, 35 mg/m(2). Of 12 evaluable patients, 7 (58%) achieved an objective response., Conclusions: Gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) plus docetaxel 35 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle is a safe regimen which shows activity in heavily pretreated patients with MBC. Further phase II investigations with this combination are now warranted., (Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel)