Search

Background and Objective: This study aimed to evaluate endoscopic findings using linked color imaging (LCI) and blue laser imaging (BLI) and to determine a diagnostic predictor for duodenal adenocarcinomas. Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) between October 2012 and June 2019 were enrolled in this study. Two highly experienced endoscopists investigated six morphological findings using both white light imaging and LCI and three magnifying endoscopic findings using magnifying BLI (M-BLI). Results: A total of 90 patients with 110 SNADETs, including 87 adenocarcinomas and 23 adenomas, were analyzed in this study. Among the non-magnifying endoscopic findings, the presence of reddish color, orange color on LCI (orange color sign), lobulation, depression, and marginally white opaque substance were found significantly more frequently in adenocarcinomas than in adenomas (p = 0.015, p < 0.001, p = 0.048, p < 0.001, and p = 0.007, respectively). Among the magnifying endoscopic findings, a mixed microsurface pattern (MSP), irregular MSP, and irregular microvascular pattern were found significantly more frequently in adenocarcinomas than in adenomas (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.002, respectively). In the multivariate analysis of all endoscopic findings associated with adenocarcinoma, orange color sign (odds ratio [OR] 10.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.42–77.08; p = 0.021), mixed MSP (OR 4.66; 95% CI: 1.02–21.40; p = 0.048), and irregular MSP (OR 13.11; 95% CI: 1.41–121.99; p = 0.024) were independent predictors of adenocarcinoma. Conclusions: The presence of orange color sign on LCI and mixed/irregular MSP on M-BLI were independent diagnostic predictors that were frequently observed in duodenal adenocarcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Case Report:A 65-year-old man without any symptoms received colonoscopy for cancer screening and underwent cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for a 3-mm rectal lesion at a local clinic. A histopathological examination revealed neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G1 with a positive margin. The patient was referred to our hospital for further treatment. Then, the post-CSP scar was removed by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), with a sufficient endoscopically normal margin. Histopathology showed 4 NETs and endocrine cell micronests (ECMs) distant from the post-CSP scar, with a positive lateral margin. We considered that the possibility of other NETs was high. Additional surgery was performed. After a histopathological examination, 11 NETs and ECMs were found in the whole rectum, without lymph node metastasis. The patient had no recurrence at 24 months after surgery. In the past 10 years, we have experienced 4 cases (including the present case) of multiple rectal NETs among 56 cases of rectal NETs of ≤10 mm (7.1%). None of our 4 cases showed any recurrence (follow-up period: 12–32 months).Conclusions:We herein report a case involving a patient with 15 rectal NETs and ECMs. We reviewed our experience with multiple rectal NETs, and the rate of multiple rectal NETs was 7.1%. Endoscopists should consider that multiple lesions may be present in cases of rectal NET and be aware that some cannot be detected endoscopically. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: An innovative endoscopic system using 4-color light-emitting diodes (LED) was released between 2016 and 2017 in locations that had not approved laser endoscopes for use, including the United States and Europe. Objective: This study compared the diagnostic efficacy between magnifying blue light imaging with an LED light source (LED-BLI) and magnifying blue laser imaging with a laser light source (Laser-BLI) for early gastric cancer (EGC). Methods: In this prospective, single-center, noninferiority study, 80 gastric lesions were evaluated between January 2017 and July 2017. The magnifying findings of gastric lesions – including the demarcation line (DL), microvascular pattern (MVP), and microsurface pattern (MSP) – were evaluated using Laser-BLI and LED-BLI according to the vessel plus surface classification system (VSCS). The primary end point was to determine whether the diagnostic accuracy of LED-BLI for EGC was noninferior to that of conventional Laser-BLI. Results: Overall, we evaluated 79 gastric lesions histopathologically diagnosed as adenocarcinomas from the specimens obtained via endoscopic submucosal dissection. A DL was observed by Laser-BLI and LED-BLI in 98.7% (78/79) and 96.2% (76/79) of EGCs, respectively. The MVP observed using Laser-BLI and LED-BLI was irregular in 92.4% (73/79) and 89.9% (71/79), respectively. The MSP observed using Laser-BLI and LED-BLI was irregular in 83.5% (66/79) and 82.2% (65/79), respectively. According to the VSCS, diagnosable cancers were found in 94.9% (75/79) and 93.7% (74/79) of cases when using Laser-BLI and LED-BLI, respectively (p = 0.73; difference ratio, 1.2%; 95% CI –8.5 to 6.0%). Conclusions: LED-BLI could accurately visualize the DL, MVP, and MSP of EGCs and was not inferior to Laser-BLI. Therefore, LED-BLI can be used to diagnose EGC accurately according to the VSCS-based diagnosis criteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: Settings of structure and color enhancement (CE) change view of white light imaging and a preset low enhancement setting is used regularly. The aim of this study was to investigate whether higher enhancement settings increased colorectal lesions' visibility with endoscopists' visibility scoring and objective color difference (CD) value. Methods: From April 2015 to September 2015, we analyzed 27 pictures and 100 videos of colorectal lesions. Combinations of structure enhancement (B3, A3, A5) and CE (CE 0, 1, 3) were evaluated and CD values of 2 corresponding modes (high enhancement: A5 + CE3, preset low enhancement: A3 + CE0) were calculated using marketed software. In the video, these 2 modes were evaluated. All pictures and movies were graded by 4 endoscopists using visibility scores: score 4 (excellent) to score 1 (poor). Results: The scores of A3 + CE0 (2.74 ± 1.09) were significantly lower than those of all other higher enhancement settings such as B3 + CE1 (3.11 ± 1.08), A3 + CE1 (3.33 ± 0.91), and A5 + CE3 (3.56 ± 0.74; p < 0.001). The CD value of A5 + CE3 was significantly higher than A3 + CE0 (20.2 ± 6.9 vs. 12.9 ± 5.6, p < 0.001). In the video, the scores for A5 + CE3 were significantly higher than A3 + CE0 (3.27 ± 0.83 vs. 2.53 ± 1.05, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Higher enhancement settings increased visibility of colorectal lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]