Search

Introduction: The phase III IMbrave150 study established atezolizumab + bevacizumab as the global standard of care in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This exploratory analysis examined the impact of bevacizumab interruption due to bevacizumab adverse events of special interest (AESIs). Methods: Patients in IMbrave150 who were randomized to atezolizumab + bevacizumab and received treatment for ≥6 months (to reduce immortal time bias) were included in group A-1 if bevacizumab had ever been skipped due to bevacizumab AESIs or to group A-2 otherwise. Efficacy analyses included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by whether bevacizumab was skipped (group A-1 vs. A-2). PFS was evaluated per independent review facility (IRF)-assessed Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1 and HCC-modified RECIST (IRF-HCC mRECIST). Safety was also evaluated. Results: Of the 210 patients who received ≥6 months of atezolizumab + bevacizumab, 69 were assigned to group A-1 and 141 to A-2. At data cutoff (August 20, 2020), hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 1.04 (95% CI: 0.64, 1.69) for group A-1 versus A-2. HR for PFS was 1.07 (95% CI: 0.74, 1.55) per IRF-assessed RECIST 1.1 and 1.10 (95% CI: 0.76, 1.59; 15.5 vs. 9.7 months) per IRF-HCC mRECIST for group A-1 versus A-2. Safety profiles for atezolizumab and bevacizumab were largely similar between groups. More group A-1 patients had grade 3/4 adverse events. A separate analysis investigating the impact of immortal time bias in patients who received ≥3 months of atezolizumab + bevacizumab supported the appropriateness of the ≥6-month landmark analysis. Discussion/Conclusion: Efficacy was similar between patients who skipped bevacizumab due to bevacizumab AESIs and those who did not. Although this comparison was nonrandomized and exploratory, results suggest that skipping bevacizumab due to bevacizumab AESIs did not considerably impact the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab + bevacizumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Composite cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibition has shown potential as a treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in preclinical studies. We tested whether the specific inhibition of CDK9 was effective against HCC. Methods: The effects of two specific CDK9 inhibitors, BAY1143572 and AZD4573, in HCC cell lines were examined. We tested the in vivo efficacy of CDK9 inhibition in mouse xenograft models of HuH7 human HCC cells and in an orthotopic model of BNL mouse HCC cells. Overexpression and knockdown of CDK9 were performed to confirm the efficacy of CDK9 inhibition. Results: CDK9 inhibitors exhibited potent antiproliferative activities in HCC cells regardless of the levels of c-myc expression while inhibiting the downstream signals of CDK9, such as the phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II. These 2 CDK9 inhibitors induced apoptosis in HCC cells and reduced the expression of antiapoptotic proteins such as myeloid cell leukemia-1 and survivin. In the xenograft studies, mice receiving either CDK9 inhibitor exhibited significantly slower tumor growth than did the mice receiving vehicles. In the orthotopic model, the HCC growth in mice receiving a CDK9 inhibitor also tended to be slower than that in the control group. Overexpression of CDK9 in HuH7 cells reduced the efficacy of both CDK9 inhibitors. Knockdown of CDK9 expression reduced the proliferative activities of HCC cells. Conclusion: We demonstrated the in vitro and in vivo activity of CDK9 inhibition on multiple HCC cell lines. Our data support further clinical development of CDK9 inhibitors as a treatment for HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Inducible co-stimulator (ICOS), an important co-stimulatory receptor on effector T cells (Teffs), may also contribute to tumor growth due to its high expression on regulatory T cells (Tregs). This study explored the clinical significance of ICOS-expressing Tregs in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Tumor tissues from HCC patients who received curative hepatectomy were obtained at a referral center. Dual immunohistochemistry was performed to evaluate the expression of ICOS and Foxp3. The cell densities and proximities between stained cells in regions of interest were measured by digital pathology and the associations with clinical outcome were analyzed. Results: A total of 142 patients (male:female = 112: 30, median age of 61.0 years) were enrolled. Among them, 87 (61.3%) had chronic hepatitis B virus infection and 33 (23.2%) had chronic hepatitis C infection. Low α-fetoprotein level (<20 ng/mL) and early-stage were significantly associated with improved overall survival (OS). The density of ICOS+Foxp3+ cells and the ratio of ICOS+Foxp3+/total Foxp3+ cells were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the tumor center than in the peritumor area. Patients with a high density of ICOS+Foxp3+ cells or a high ratio of ICOS+Foxp3+/total Foxp3+ cells in the tumor center trended to have a shorter OS. A shorter distance between ICOS+Foxp3+ cells and ICOS+Foxp3− cells (likely Teffs) in the tumor center was significantly associated with a shorter OS (p = 0.030), suggesting active immunosuppression of ICOS+ Tregs on ICOS+ Teffs. Conclusion: An increased abundance of ICOS+ Tregs in the tumor center in comparison to the peritumor area indicates a strong immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of HCC. A high proportion of ICOS+Foxp3+ cells and a shorter distance between ICOS+ Tregs and other ICOS+ cells were associated with a poor OS, suggesting that depleting ICOS+ Tregs might provide clinical benefit for patients with HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a heterogeneous disease. We explored whether any specific subgroups of patients may gain more survival benefits from sorafenib as the first-line therapy for advanced HCC. Methods: PubMed and the Cochrane library were searched for phase III clinical trials that compared sorafenib with other treatments as first-line therapy for advanced HCC. We retrieved data from the published articles and then calculated synthesized hazard ratios (HRs) of overall mortality for patients of different subgroups, using patients who received other treatments as the reference. Results: Four phase III clinical trials comparing sorafenib with other treatments were included in this study. The HRs were not significantly different between patients from various geographic regions (p = 0.183), patients with different Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance statuses (p = 0.699), or patients with different tumor involvement (p = 0.221). By contrast, the synthesized HR for hepatitis C virus (HCV)+ patients was 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.80], which was significantly lower than that for HCV- patients (0.87, 95% CI 0.79-0.96, p = 0.013). Conclusions: As the first-line therapy for advanced HCC, sorafenib might provide more survival benefits to HCV+ patients than to HCV- patients. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: A germline BIM deletion polymorphism has been proposed to predict a poor treatment efficacy of certain kinase inhibitors. The current study aimed to explore whether the BIM deletion polymorphism predicts the treatment efficacy of sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: All patients who were enrolled in clinical trials to receive sorafenib-containing regimens as first-line therapy for advanced HCC and consented to providing peripheral blood samples were included. Polymerase chain reaction followed by gel electrophoresis was used to detect the germline BIM deletion polymorphism. Results: A total of 89 patients were enrolled; 69 (77%) patients had chronic hepatitis B infection, and 18 (20%) had chronic hepatitis C infection. The heterozygous BIM deletion polymorphism was identified in 9 (10%) patients. Patients with and without the BIM deletion polymorphism had similar response rates (11 vs. 6%) and disease control rates (56 vs. 61%). The time to progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival were similar between patients with and without the BIM deletion polymorphism. After adjusting for basic clinicopathologic variables and treatment regimens, the BIM polymorphism still could not predict treatment outcomes. Conclusions: The BIM deletion polymorphism was not associated with the treatment efficacy of sorafenib for advanced HCC. © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The bevacizumab/erlotinib combination was reported with high clinical activity for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by a phase II study conducted in the USA. This multicenter study across several Asian countries was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination in this population. Methods: Patients with histology-proven HCC, advanced disease and Child-Pugh class A liver function received bevacizumab 5 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks and erlotinib 150 mg/day orally as first-line therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival at 16 weeks (PFS-16W). The expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), phospho-AKT and vascular endothelial growth factor, the microvessel density and the EGFR gene copy number in HCC tissues were correlated with treatment efficacy. Results: Fifty-one patients were enrolled. The PFS-16W was 35.3% (95% CI 22.4-49.9), the median PFS was 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.3-4.4) and the median overall survival was 10.7 months (95% CI, 6.2-15.2). Grade 3/4 toxicities were uncommon, including rash, acne (10% each), diarrhea (6%) and gastrointestinal bleeding (4%). None of the evaluated biomarkers correlated with disease control or PFS. Conclusions: Bevacizumab plus erlotinib showed good tolerability and modest activity in this Asian cohort. Further studies are warranted to identify the predictive biomarkers of this combination. Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Thalidomide has been shown to have antitumor activity in some patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We initiated a phase II study to determine the safety and efficacy of adding metronomic chemotherapy to thalidomide as first-line therapy. Methods: This open- labeled, single-arm, multicentered, investigator-initiated study enrolled patients with treatment-naïve advanced HCC not amenable to locoregional therapies. Treatment included oral thalidomide (100 mg twice daily) and tegafur/uracil [125 mg/m2 (based on tegafur) twice daily]. Tumor assessment was performed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0. Pretreatment plasma levels of angiogenesis factors were correlated with patient outcomes. Results: Forty-three patients were included. Sixteen (37%) patients had a Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) score of 4, and 31 (72%) patients had chronic hepatitis B virus infection. The objective response rate was 9%, and the disease stabilization rate was 33%. The median progression-free survival was 1.9 months (95% CI 1.7-2.1 months), and the median OS was 4.6 months (95% CI 2.3-6.9 months). Treatment was generally tolerable. High baseline plasma levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 were adversely correlated with patient survivals. Conclusions: The combination of thalidomide and tegafur/uracil was safe and demonstrated modest activity in patients with advanced HCC. Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most aggressive form of lung cancer. The prognosis for SCLC patients remains unsatisfactory despite advances in chemotherapy. In this study, we sought to clarify the prognosis and treatment patterns of patients with SCLC. Methods: A cohort comprising all patients diagnosed with SCLC between January 2004 and December 2006 was assembled from the Taiwan Cancer Database. Patients were followed up until December 31, 2009, to determine overall survival. Patient survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox's proportional hazard model was used to determine the relationship between prognostic factors and median survival time. Results: Among the 1,684 patients diagnosed with SCLC, 1,215 (72%) were diagnosed with extensive-stage disease and 469 (28%) with limited-stage disease. Most of the patients were male (90%). The median survival duration of patients with limited-stage and extensive-stage SCLC was 10.3 months and 5.6 months, respectively. For limited-stage patients, surgery, chemotherapy, and combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy resulted in better survival than best supportive care (HR 0.20, p < 0.001; HR 0.61, p < 0.001, and HR 0.37, p < 0.001, respectively). For extensive-stage patients, male gender was significantly associated with a poor prognosis (HR 1.45, p < 0.001) and chemotherapy was shown to improve overall survival more effectively than best supportive care (HR 0.37, p < 0.001). Conclusion: For limited-stage SCLC patients, surgery, chemotherapy, and combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy improved survival compared to best supportive care. Extensive-stage SCLC patients benefited more from chemotherapy treatment than from best supportive care. Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We examined whether circulating endothelial progenitor (CEP) and circulating endothelial cell (CEC) levels had associations with the survival of patients who received antiangiogenic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Patients with advanced HCC were enrolled into a phase II trial evaluating a combination of sorafenib and metronomic chemotherapy with tegafur/uracil as first-line systemic therapy. CEPs and CECs were enumerated with six-color flow cytometry at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after treatment and analyzed for their associations with treatment outcomes along with other clinicopathologic factors. Results: Forty patients were enrolled. Baseline CEP and CEC levels were not associated with tumor stages, α-fetoprotein levels, or macrovascular invasion. By univariate analysis, a high baseline CEP level was a significant predictor of poor progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.02 and p = 0.004, respectively). The high baseline CEP level remained an independent, significant predictor of poor PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.953, p = 0.049] and OS (HR 2.512, p = 0.004) in multivariate analysis. On the other hand, the baseline or posttreatment CEC levels were not associated with PFS or OS. Conclusion: High baseline CEP levels were associated with poor survival in patients with advanced HCC receiving sorafenib-based antiangiogenic combination therapy. Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]