1. Plant characterization of genetically modified maize hybrids MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-88Ø17-3, MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6, and MON-ØØ6Ø3-6: alternatives for maize production in Mexico.
- Author
-
Heredia Díaz O, Aldaba Meza JL, Baltazar BM, Bojórquez Bojórquez G, Castro Espinoza L, Corrales Madrid JL, de la Fuente Martínez JM, Durán Pompa HA, Alonso Escobedo J, Espinoza Banda A, Garzón Tiznado JA, González García J, Guzmán Rodríguez JL, Madueño Martínez JI, Martínez Carrillo JL, Meng C, Quiñones Pando FJ, Rosales Robles E, Ruiz Hernández I, Treviño Ramírez JE, Uribe Montes HR, and Zavala García F
- Subjects
- Crops, Agricultural drug effects, Crops, Agricultural genetics, Crops, Agricultural growth & development, Environment, Herbicides toxicity, Mexico, Plants, Genetically Modified drug effects, Plants, Genetically Modified growth & development, Seeds drug effects, Seeds growth & development, Zea mays drug effects, Zea mays growth & development, Ecology, Plants, Genetically Modified genetics, Seeds genetics, Zea mays genetics
- Abstract
Environmental risk assessment (ERA) of genetically modified (GM) crops is a process to evaluate whether the biotechnology trait(s) in a GM crop may result in increased pest potential or harm to the environment. In this analysis, two GM insect-resistant (IR) herbicide-tolerant maize hybrids (MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-88Ø17-3 and MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6) and one herbicide-tolerant GM hybrid (MON-ØØ6Ø3-6) were compared with conventional maize hybrids of similar genetic backgrounds. Two sets of studies, Experimental Phase and Pilot Phase, were conducted across five ecological regions (ecoregions) in Mexico during 2009-2013, and data were subject to meta-analysis. Results from the Experimental Phase studies, which were used for ERA, indicated that the three GM hybrids were not different from conventional maize for early stand count, days-to-silking, days-to-anthesis, root lodging, stalk lodging, or final stand count. Statistically significant differences were observed for seedling vigor, ear height, plant height, grain moisture, and grain yield, particularly in the IR hybrids; however, none of these phenotypic differences are expected to contribute to a biological or ecological change that would result in an increased pest potential or ecological risk when cultivating these GM hybrids. Overall, results from the Experimental Phase studies are consistent with those from other world regions, confirming that there are no additional risks compared to conventional maize. Results from Pilot Phase studies indicated that, compared to conventional maize hybrids, no differences were detected for the agronomic and phenotypic characteristics measured on the three GM maize hybrids, with the exception of grain moisture and grain yield in the IR hybrids. Since MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-88Ø17-3 and MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 confer resistance to target insect pests, they are an alternative for farmers in Mexico to protect the crop from insect damage. Additionally, the herbicide tolerance conferred by all three GM hybrids enables more cost-effective weed management.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF