1. The Korean Version of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment: Reliability and Validity Evaluation
- Author
-
Eun Hye Kim, Sung Hwan Hwang, Joon-Ho Shin, Yujin Choi, Jae Woong Hwang, Wang Jae Lee, Tae Lim Kim, Inyong Cho, Jung Ah Lee, and Jin Ho Park
- Subjects
validity ,030506 rehabilitation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Correlation coefficient ,translation ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,Medicine ,restroke rehabilitation ,Motor assessment ,fugl-meyer assessment ,Reliability (statistics) ,Balance (ability) ,reliability ,business.industry ,Rehabilitation ,Fugl meyer ,Berg Balance Scale ,Original Article ,0305 other medical science ,business ,Range of motion ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Korean version - Abstract
Objective To systematically translate the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) into a Korean version of the FMA (K-FMA).Methods We translated the original FMA into the Korean version with three translators and a translation committee, which included physiatrists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists. Based on a test-retest method, each of 31 patients with stroke was assessed by two evaluators twice, once on recruitment, and again after a week. Analysis of intra- and inter-rater reliabilities was performed using the intra-class correlation coefficient, whereas validity was analysed using Pearson correlation test along with the Motricity Index (MI), Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS).Results The intra- and inter-rater reliabilities were significant for the total score, and good to excellent reliability was noted in all domains except for the joint range of motion of the lower extremity domain of the K-FMA. The MI and MAS scores were significantly correlated with all domains, all with p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF