Search

Study Design A retrospective study. Purpose To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of ankylosing spinal disorder (ASD) patients with spinal fractures treated by minimally invasive stabilization (MISt) using percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs). Overview of Literature ASDs, such as ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH), increase susceptibility to spinal fractures because of extremely decreased spinal flexibility. Such fractures tend to be unstable and, consequently, should be treated with multiple-segmental internal fixation. However, conventional internal fixation procedures can severely damage the soft tissue, resulting in severe hemorrhage. Therefore, MISt is the preferred approach to treat spinal fractures in ASD patients. Methods Nine ASD patients (four males and five females; three AS and six DISH patients) with spinal fractures who were treated by MISt using PPSs, were reviewed from April 2009 to August 2016. One patient died of aspiration pneumonia during follow-up (FU), and the remaining eight patients underwent clinical and radiological evaluation. Results The mean age at surgery was 79.6 years (range, 68–95 years). The mean duration of postoperative FU was 14.2 months (range, 3–30 months). All treated fractures were anterior and posterior element injuries with distraction. Three patients presented delayed onset preoperative neurological deficit following trauma. The mean operation time was 179.6 minutes (range, 92–340 minutes). The mean hemorrhage was 103.6 mL (range, unquantifiable to 480 mL). Radiological evaluations at FU showed preservation of the acceptable postoperative correction of the fractured vertebra, as there were no re-collapses of the fractured vertebrae during FU. Conclusions ASD patients must be acknowledged as highly susceptible to unstable spinal fractures, even after relatively mild trauma. MISt using PPSs may be an effective treatment for spinal fractures in such patients.

Study DesignRetrospective study.PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of minimally invasive transtubular endoscopic decompression for the treatment of lumbosacral extraforaminal lesion (LSEFL).Overview of LiteratureConventional procedures for surgical decompression for the treatment of LSEFL involve certain technical challenges because the lumbosacral extraforaminal region has unique anatomical features. Moreover, the efficacy of minimally invasive procedures performed via the posterolateral approach for LSEFL has been reported.MethodsTwenty-five patients who had undergone minimally invasive transtubular endoscopic decompression for the treatment of LSEFL and could be followed up for at least 1 year postoperatively were enrolled. Five of these patients had a history of lumbar surgery, and seven had concomitant adjacent-level spinal stenosis. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) lumbar score, numeric rating scale (NRS), and the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). The mean postoperative follow-up (FU) duration was 3.8 years.ResultsAll procedures could be completed without any severe surgical complications, and all patients could resume their previous activity level within 1 month postoperatively. The JOA score significantly increased from 14.1±4.0 at baseline to 23.1±3.7 at the 1-year FU and 22.1±3.8 at the last FU. Similarly, there were significant improvements in the postoperative NRS and JOABPEQ scores. An additional surgery was performed in two patients (8%) during the FU period. Patients with degenerative scoliosis exhibited significantly poorer outcomes compared with those without this condition.ConclusionsTranstubular endoscopic decompression can overcome certain technical challenges involved in the conventional procedures for LSEFL treatment; therefore, it can be recommended as a useful procedure for treating LSEFL. This procedure can provide some benefits to LSEFL patients and offer a well-illuminated surgical field and high surgical safety for the surgeon. However, the procedure should be carefully adapted for LSEFL patients with concomitant degenerative scoliosis.

This report introduces a percutaneous transpedicular interbody fusion (PTPIF) technique in posterior stabilization using percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs). An 81-year-old man presented with pseudoarthrosis following pyogenic spondylitis 15 months before. Although no relapse of infection was found, he complained of obstinate low back pain and mild neurological symptoms. Radiological evaluations showed a pseudoarthrosis following pyogenic spondylitis at T11–12. Posterior stabilization using PPSs from Th9 to L2 and concomitant PTPIF using autologous iliac bone graft at T11–12 were performed. Low back pain and neurological symptoms were immediately improved after surgery. A solid interbody fusion at T11–12 was completed 9 months after surgery. The patient had no restriction of daily activity and could play golf at one year after surgery. PTPIF might be a useful option for perform segmental fusion in posterior stabilization using PPSs.