Search

Background: Anal adenocarcinoma bears a treatment strategy unique to other anal cancers., Objective: This study aimed to describe oncologic outcomes of total neoadjuvant therapy followed by watch-and-wait approach for anal adenocarcinoma., Design: Retrospective analysis., Settings: This study was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center., Patients: Patients with anal adenocarcinoma treated between 2004 and 2019 were selected., Interventions: Fifty-four patients received neoadjuvant therapy and were divided into 2 groups according to their treatment strategy: total neoadjuvant therapy versus single neoadjuvant modality therapy., Main Outcome Measures: Organ preservation, tumor regrowth, local failure, distant metastasis rates, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival., Results: This study included 70 patients with anal adenocarcinoma. Fifty-four patients (77%) received neoadjuvant therapy, of whom 30 (42%) received total neoadjuvant therapy and 24 (34%) received single neoadjuvant modality. Twenty-three (33%) patients achieved complete clinical response and were managed by watch-and-wait approach. The proportion of patients able to continue to watch-and-wait approach was higher after receiving total neoadjuvant therapy (60%) compared with single neoadjuvant modality therapy (20%; p = 0.004). A tumor regrowth rate of 22% was observed in the total neoadjuvant therapy group. The 5-year overall survival rate was 70% (95% CI, 59%-83%), including 61% (95% CI, 42%-88%) for the total neoadjuvant therapy and 65% (95% CI, 48%-88%) for the single neoadjuvant modality groups. Colostomy was avoided in 50% of patients who received total neoadjuvant therapy and 83% of watch-and-wait patients. Five-year recurrence-free survival rates of 55% (95% CI, 39%-79%) and 30% (95% CI, 15%-58%) were observed in the total neoadjuvant therapy and single neoadjuvant modality groups., Limitations: Retrospective nature., Conclusions: This is the first report in the literature describing the safety and feasibility of nonoperative management for anal adenocarcinoma. Anal adenocarcinoma treated with total neoadjuvant therapy and nonoperative management achieve regrowth rates comparable to those observed in rectal cancer, with oncologic outcomes similar to those of traditional treatment strategies. See Video Abstract ., Adenocarcinoma Anal Tratado En La Era De La Terapia Neoadyuvante Total Y El Tratamiento No Quirrgico: ANTECEDENTES:El adenocarcinoma anal conlleva una estrategia de tratamiento único para otros cánceres anales.OBJETIVO:Describir los resultados oncológicos de la terapia neoadyuvante total seguida de observar y esperar en adenocarcinoma anal.DISEÑO:Análisis retrospectivo.AJUSTE:Este estudio se llevó a cabo en un centro oncológico integral.PACIENTES:Se seleccionaron pacientes con adenocarcinoma anal tratados entre 2004-2019.INTERVENCIONES:Cincuenta y cuatro pacientes recibieron terapia neoadyuvante y se dividieron en dos grupos según su estrategia de tratamiento: terapia neoadyuvante total versus terapia de modalidad neoadyuvante única.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Preservación de órganos, recurrencia tumoral, falla local, tasas de metástasis a distancia, libre de recurrencia y supervivencia general.RESULTADOS:El estudio incluyó a 70 pacientes con adenocarcinoma anal. Cincuenta y cuatro pacientes (77%) recibieron terapia neoadyuvante, de los cuales 30 (42%) recibieron terapia neoadyuvante total y 24 (34%) recibieron modalidad neoadyuvante única. Veintitrés (33%) pacientes presentaron una respuesta clínica completa y fueron tratados con vigilancia y espera. La proporción de pacientes capaces de continuar en observar y esperar fue mayor después de recibir terapia neoadyuvante total (60%) en comparación con la terapia de modalidad neoadyuvante única (20%) ( p = 0,004). Se observó una tasa de recurrencia tumoral del 22% en el grupo de terapia neoadyuvante total. La tasa de supervivencia general a 5 años fue del 70% (IC95% 59%-83 %), incluido el 61% (IC95% 42%-88%) para la terapia neoadyuvante total y el 65% (IC95% 48%-88%) para grupos de modalidad neoadyuvante única. Se evitó la colostomía en el 50% de los pacientes que recibieron terapia neoadyuvante total y el 83% de los pacientes en observar y esperar. Se observaron tasas de supervivencia libre de recurrencia a cinco años del 55% (IC95% 39%-79%) y del 30% (IC95% 15%-58%) en los grupos de terapia neoadyuvante total y modalidad neoadyuvante única, respectivamente.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:Este es el primer informe en la literatura que describe la seguridad y viabilidad del tratamiento no quirúrgico del adenocarcinoma anal. El adenocarcinoma anal tratado con terapia neoadyuvante total y manejo no quirúrgico logra tasas de recurrencia comparables a las observadas en el cáncer de recto, con resultados oncológicos similares a las estrategias de tratamientos tradicionales. (Traducción-Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy )., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2024.)

Background: Restaging endoscopy plays a critical role in selecting patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who respond to neoadjuvant therapy for nonoperative management., Objective: This study evaluated the restaging endoscopic features that best predict the presence of residual tumor in the bowel wall., Design: This was a post hoc analysis of a prospective randomized trial., Settings: The Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma Trial randomly assigned patients across 18 institutions with stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma to receive either induction or consolidation total neoadjuvant therapy. Surgeons completed a restaging tumor assessment form, which stratified patients across 3 tiers of clinical response., Patients: Patients enrolled in the Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma Trial with a completed tumor assessment form were included., Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome was residual tumor, which was defined as either an incomplete clinical response or local tumor regrowth within 2 years of restaging. Independent predictors of residual tumor were identified using backward-selected multivariable logistic regression analysis. Subgroup analyses for complete and near complete clinical responders were performed., Results: Surgeons completed restaging forms for 263 patients at a median of 7.7 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy; 128 patients (48.7%) had a residual tumor. On multivariable regression analysis, several characteristics of a near complete response, including ulcer (OR 6.66; 95% CI, 2.54-19.9), irregular mucosa (OR 3.66; 95% CI, 1.61-8.68), and nodularity (OR 2.96; 95% CI, 1.36-6.58), remained independent predictors of residual tumor. A flat scar was associated with lower odds of harboring residual disease (OR 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11-0.93) for patients categorized as clinical complete responders., Limitations: Limitations include analysis of endoscopic features at a single time point and ambiguities in tumor assessment form response criteria., Conclusions: Patients with ulcer, nodularity, or irregular mucosa, on restaging endoscopy have higher odds of residual tumor. Recognizing negative prognostic implications of these features will help surgeons better select candidates for nonoperative management and suggests that patients with high-risk characteristics would benefit from close interval surveillance. See Video Abstract ., Predictores Endoscpicos De Tumor Residual Despus De Terapia Neoadyuvante Total Un Anlisis Post Hoc Del Ensayo De Preservacin De Rganos En Adenocarcinoma Rectal: ANTECEDENTES:La reestadificación por endoscopia juega un papel crítico en la selección de pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado que responden a la terapia neoadyuvante para el manejo no quirúrgico.OBJETIVO:Este estudio evaluó las características endoscópicas de reestadificación que mejor predicen la presencia de tumor residual en la pared intestinal.DISEÑO:Este fue un análisis post hoc de un ensayo prospectivo aleatorizado.ESCENARIO:El ensayo Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma aleatorizó a pacientes de 18 instituciones con adenocarcinoma de recto en estadio II/III para recibir terapia neoadyuvante total de inducción o consolidación. Los cirujanos completaron un formulario de reestadificación de evaluación del tumor, que estratificó a los pacientes en tres niveles de respuesta clínica.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes inscritos en el ensayo de preservación de órganos en adenocarcinoma rectal con un formulario de evaluación del tumor completado.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado principal fue presencia de tumor residual, que se definió como una respuesta clínica incompleta o un nuevo crecimiento local del tumor dentro de los dos años posteriores a la reestadificación. Los predictores independientes de tumor residual se identificaron mediante un análisis de regresión logística multivariable seleccionado hacia atrás. Se realizaron análisis de subgrupos para pacientes con respuesta clínica completa y casi completa.RESULTADOS:Los cirujanos completaron formularios de reestadificación para 263 pacientes en una mediana de 7.7 semanas después de la terapia neoadyuvante; 128 (48.7%) tenían tumor residual. En el análisis de regresión multivariable, varias características de una respuesta casi completa, incluyendo úlcera (OR 6.66; IC 95% 2.54-19.9), mucosa irregular (OR 3.66; IC 95% 1.61-8.68) y nodularidad (OR 2.96; IC 95% 1.36 -6.58) siguieron siendo predictores independientes de tumor residual. Una cicatriz plana se asoció con menores probabilidades de albergar enfermedad residual (OR 0.32; IC del 95 %: 0.11-0.93) para los pacientes clasificados como respondedores clínicos completos.LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones de este estudio incluyen el análisis de las características endoscópicas en un solo momento y las ambigüedades en los criterios de respuesta.en la forma de evaluación del tumorCONCLUSIONES:Los pacientes con úlcera, nodularidad o mucosa irregular en la endoscopia de reestadificación tienen mayores probabilidades de tumor residual. El reconocer las implicaciones pronósticas negativas de estas características ayudará a los cirujanos a seleccionar mejor a los candidatos para el tratamiento no quirúrgico y sugiere que los pacientes con características de alto riesgo se beneficiarían de una vigilancia a intervalos estrechos. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco )., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2023.)

Background: The Memorial Sloan Kettering clinical calculator for estimating the likelihood of freedom from colon cancer recurrence on the basis of clinical and molecular variables was developed at a time when testing for microsatellite instability was performed selectively, based on patient age, family history, and histologic features. Microsatellite stability was assumed if no testing was done., Objective: This study aimed to validate the calculator in a cohort of patients who had all been tested for microsatellite instability., Design: Retrospective cohort analysis., Settings: Comprehensive cancer center., Patients: This study included consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for stage I, II, or III colon cancer between 2017 and 2019., Intervention: Universal testing of mircrosatellite phenotype in all cases., Main Outcome Measures: The calculator's predictive accuracy was assessed using the concordance index and a calibration plot of predicted versus actual freedom from recurrence at 3 years after surgery. For a secondary sensitivity analysis, the presence of a tumor deposit(s) (disease category N1c) was considered equivalent to one positive lymph node (category N1a)., Results: With a median follow-up of 32 months among survivors, the concordance index for the 745 patients in the cohort was 0.748 (95% CI, 0.693-0.801), and a plot of predicted versus observed recurrences approached the 45° diagonal, indicating good discrimination and calibration. In the secondary sensitivity analysis for tumor deposits, the concordance index was 0.755 (95% CI, 0.700-0.806)., Limitations: This study was limited by its retrospective, single-institution design., Conclusions: These results, based on inclusion of actual rather than imputed microsatellite stability status and presence of tumor deposits, confirm the predictive accuracy and reliability of the calculator. See Video Abstract ., Validacin De Una Calculadora Clnica Que Predice La Ausencia De Recurrencia Postquirurgica Del Cncer De Colon Sobre La Base De Variables Moleculares Y Clnicas: ANTECEDENTES:La calculadora clínica del Memorial Sloan Kettering para la estimación de la probabilidad de ausencia de recurrencia del cáncer de colon sobre la base de variables clínicas y moleculares, se desarrolló en un momento en que las pruebas para la inestabilidad de microsatélites se realizaban de forma selectiva, basadas en la edad del paciente, los antecedentes familiares y las características histológicas. Se asumía la estabilidad micro satelital si no se realizaba ninguna prueba.OBJETIVO:El objetivo de este estudio fue validar la calculadora en una cohorte de pacientes a los que se les había realizado la prueba de inestabilidad de microsatélites.DISEÑO:Análisis de cohorte retrospectivo.AJUSTE:Centro integral de cáncer.PACIENTES:Pacientes consecutivos con cáncer de colon que fueron sometidos a resección curativa por cáncer de colon en estadios I, II o III entre los años 2017 y 2019.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La precisión predictiva de la calculadora fue evaluada mediante el índice de concordancia y un gráfico de calibración de la ausencia de recurrencia predecida versus la real a los 3 años tras la cirugía. A los efectos de un análisis secundario de sensibilidad, la presencia de depósito(s) tumoral(es) (categoría de enfermedad N1c) se consideró equivalente a un ganglio linfático positivo (categoría N1a).RESULTADOS:Con una mediana de seguimiento de 32 meses entre los supervivientes, el índice de concordancia para los 745 pacientes de la cohorte fue de 0,748 (intervalo de confianza del 95 %, 0,693 a 0,801), y una gráfica de recurrencias previstas versus observadas se acercó a la diagonal de 45°, indicando una buena discriminación y calibración. En el análisis secundario de sensibilidad para depósitos tumorales, el índice de concordancia fue de 0,755 (intervalo de confianza del 95 %, 0,700 a 0,806).LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo, institución única.CONCLUSIONES:Estos resultados, basados en la inclusión real del estado de estabilidad de microsatélites en lugar de imputado y la presencia de depósitos tumorales, confirman la precisión predictiva y la confiabilidad de la calculadora. (Traducción-Dr Osvaldo Gauto )., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2023.)

Background: Laparoscopic resection for colon cancer has not been associated with improvements in oncological outcomes in comparison to open resection. Robotic resections are associated with increased lymph node yield and radicality of mesenteric resection in patients with right-sided tumors. It is unclear whether lymph node yield is higher in robotic resections in other parts of the colon and whether higher lymph node yield is associated with improved survival., Objective: To compare survival rates between robotic, laparoscopic, and open resections in a large cohort of patients with nonmetastatic colon cancer., Design: This is a retrospective observational study., Setting: A single comprehensive cancer center., Patients: Patients who underwent resection of nonmetastatic primary colon cancer between January 2006 and December 2018., Main Outcome Measures: Univariable and multivariable models were used to identify predictors of disease-free and overall survival. Lymph node yield and perioperative outcomes were compared between operative approaches., Results: There were 2398 patients who met the inclusion criteria: 699 (29%) underwent open, 824 (34%) underwent laparoscopic, and 875 (36%) underwent robotic resection. The median follow-up was 3.8 years (45.4 months). Robotic surgery was associated with higher lymph node yield and radicality of mesenteric resection. On multivariable analysis, the surgical approach was not associated with a difference in disease-free or overall survival. Minimally invasive colectomy was associated with fewer complications and shorter length of stay in comparison to open surgery. In a direct comparison between the 2 minimally invasive approaches, robotic colectomy was associated with fewer complications, shorter length of stay, and lower conversion rate than laparoscopy., Limitations: This was a single-center retrospective study., Conclusions: Our data indicate that the 3 surgical approaches are similarly effective in treating primary resectable colon cancer and that differences in outcomes are observed primarily in the early postoperative period. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C115 ., Comparacin De Resecciones Robticas, Laparoscpicas Y Abiertas De Cncer De Colon No Metastsico: ANTECEDENTES:La resección laparoscópica para el cáncer de colon no se ha asociado con mejoras en los resultados oncológicos en comparación con la resección abierta. Las resecciones robóticas se asocian con un mayor rendimiento de los ganglios linfáticos y la radicalidad de la resección mesentérica en pacientes con tumores del lado derecho. No está claro si la cosecha ganglionar es mayor en las resecciones robóticas en otras partes del colon y si un mayor rendimiento de los ganglios linfáticos se asocia con una mejor supervivencia.OBJETIVO:Comparar las tasas de supervivencia entre resecciones robóticas, laparoscópicas y abiertas en una gran cohorte de pacientes con cáncer de colon no metastásico.DISEÑO:Este es un estudio observacional retrospectivo.ESCENARIO:Este estudio se realizó en un único centro oncológico integral.PACIENTES:Pacientes que se sometieron a resección de cáncer de colon primario no metastásico entre enero de 2006 y diciembre de 2018.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se utilizaron modelos univariables y multivariables para identificar predictores de supervivencia libre de enfermedad y global. La cosecha ganglionar y los resultados perioperatorios se compararon entre los abordajes quirúrgicos.RESULTADOS:Hubo 2398 pacientes que cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión: 699 (29%) se sometieron a cirugía abierta, 824 (34%) se sometieron a resección laparoscópica y 875 (36%) se sometieron a resección robótica. La mediana de seguimiento fue de 3,8 años (45,4 meses). La cirugía robótica se asoció con una mayor cosecha ganglionar y la radicalidad de la resección mesentérica. En el análisis multivariable, el abordaje quirúrgico no se asoció con una diferencia en la supervivencia general o libre de enfermedad. La colectomía mínimamente invasiva se asoció con menos complicaciones y una estancia más corta en comparación con la cirugía abierta. En una comparación directa entre los dos enfoques mínimamente invasivos, la colectomía robótica se asoció con menos complicaciones, una estancia más corta y una tasa de conversión más baja que la laparoscopia.LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio retrospectivo de un solo centro.CONCLUSIONES:Nuestros datos indican que los tres enfoques quirúrgicos son igualmente efectivos en el tratamiento del cáncer de colon resecable primario y que las diferencias en los resultados se observan principalmente en el período posoperatorio temprano. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C115 . (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio )., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2023.)

Background: A barrier to the widespread adoption of watch-and-wait management for locally advanced rectal cancer is the inaccuracy and variability of identifying tumor response endoscopically in patients who have completed total neoadjuvant therapy (chemoradiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy)., Objective: This study aimed to develop a novel method of identifying the presence or absence of a tumor in endoscopic images using deep convolutional neural network-based automatic classification and to assess the accuracy of the method., Design: In this prospective pilot study, endoscopic images obtained before, during, and after total neoadjuvant therapy were grouped on the basis of tumor presence. A convolutional neural network was modified for probabilistic classification of tumor versus no tumor and trained with an endoscopic image set. After training, a testing endoscopic imaging set was applied to the network., Settings: The study was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center., Patients: Images were analyzed from 109 patients who were diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer between December 2012 and July 2017 and who underwent total neoadjuvant therapy., Main Outcome Measures: The main outcomes were accuracy of identifying tumor presence or absence in endoscopic images measured as area under the receiver operating characteristic for the training and testing image sets., Results: A total of 1392 images were included; 1099 images (468 of no tumor and 631 of tumor) were for training and 293 images (151 of no tumor and 142 of tumor) for testing. The area under the receiver operating characteristic for training and testing was 0.83., Limitations: The study had a limited number of images in each set and was conducted at a single institution., Conclusions: The convolutional neural network method is moderately accurate in distinguishing tumor from no tumor. Further research should focus on validating the convolutional neural network on a large image set. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B959 ., Modelo Basado En Aprendizaje Profundo Para Identificar Tumores En Imgenes Endoscpicas De Pacientes Con Cncer De Recto Localmente Avanzado Tratados Con Terapia Neoadyuvante Total: ANTECEDENTES:Una barrera para la aceptación generalizada del tratamiento de Observar y Esperar para el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado, es la imprecisión y la variabilidad en la identificación de la respuesta tumoral endoscópica, en pacientes que completaron la terapia neoadyuvante total (quimiorradioterapia y quimioterapia sistémica).OBJETIVO:Desarrollar un método novedoso para identificar la presencia o ausencia de un tumor en imágenes endoscópicas utilizando una clasificación automática basada en redes neuronales convolucionales profundas y evaluar la precisión del método.DISEÑO:Las imágenes endoscópicas obtenidas antes, durante y después de la terapia neoadyuvante total se agruparon en base de la presencia del tumor. Se modificó una red neuronal convolucional para la clasificación probabilística de tumor versus no tumor y se entrenó con un conjunto de imágenes endoscópicas. Después del entrenamiento, se aplicó a la red un conjunto de imágenes endoscópicas de prueba.ENTORNO CLINICO:El estudio se realizó en un centro oncológico integral.PACIENTES:Analizamos imágenes de 109 pacientes que fueron diagnosticados de cáncer de recto localmente avanzado entre diciembre de 2012 y julio de 2017 y que se sometieron a terapia neoadyuvante total.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:La precisión en la identificación de la presencia o ausencia de tumores en imágenes endoscópicas medidas como el área bajo la curva de funcionamiento del receptor para los conjuntos de imágenes de entrenamiento y prueba.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron mil trescientas noventa y dos imágenes: 1099 (468 sin tumor y 631 con tumor) para entrenamiento y 293 (151 sin tumor y 142 con tumor) para prueba. El área bajo la curva operativa del receptor para entrenamiento y prueba fue de 0,83.LIMITACIONES:El estudio tuvo un número limitado de imágenes en cada conjunto y se realizó en una sola institución.CONCLUSIÓN:El método de la red neuronal convolucional es moderadamente preciso para distinguir el tumor de ningún tumor. La investigación adicional debería centrarse en validar la red neuronal convolucional en un conjunto de imágenes mayor. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B959 . (Traducción -Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy )., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2022.)

Background: There is limited knowledge on long-term bowel, sexual, and urinary function after combined modality therapy for anal squamous-cell cancer., Objective: This study aimed to evaluate long-term changes in patients treated with combined modality., Design: This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected patient-reported outcome surveys., Setting: This study was conducted at a single institution., Patients: There were 143 patients with stage I to III anal cancer who were treated with chemoradiation and had completed the survey., Main Outcome Measures: This study included patient-reported outcomes reflecting bowel, sexual, and urinary function., Results: Thirty-nine percent of patients had major low anterior resection syndrome at baseline. Major low anterior resection syndrome remained stable (38%; 95% CI, 31%-46%) with no change over time (OR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.74-1.21; p = 0.7). Higher rates of major low anterior resection syndrome were observed for patients who had major low anterior resection syndrome at baseline (OR 20.7; 95% CI 4.70-91.3; p < 0.001) and for females (OR 2.14; 95% CI, 1.01-4.56; p = 0.047). On 5-point scales, we saw a nonsignificant increased level of sexual arousal during sexual activity after therapy for women (β for 1 year = 0.15; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.32; p = 0.072) and nonsignificant decreased confidence in getting and keeping an erection after therapy for men (β for 1 year = -0.33; 95% CI, -0.66 to 0.00; p = 0.053)., Limitations: This was a single-institution study and only patients who answered the questionnaire were included in the study., Conclusions: A significant proportion of patients have major low anterior resection syndrome at baseline and after successful treatment for anal cancer. Having major low anterior resection syndrome at baseline was the biggest predictor of having major low anterior resection syndrome after treatment. Bowel, sexual, and urinary function did not improve over time up to 2 years after end of treatment. Physicians should counsel their patients before treatment that baseline poor bowel function is a risk factor for posttreatment bowel dysfunction. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C29 ., Evaluacin De Los Resultados Informados Por Los Pacientes Con Cncer Anal De Clulas Escamosas Que Se Someten a Una Terapia De Modalidad Combinada: ANTECEDENTES:Existe un conocimiento limitado sobre la función intestinal, sexual y urinaria a largo plazo después de la terapia de modalidad combinada para el cáncer anal de células escamosas.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los cambios a largo plazo en la función intestinal, sexual y urinaria en pacientes tratados con modalidad combinada.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio retrospectivo de encuestas de resultados informadas por pacientes recolectadas prospectivamente.ESCENARIO:Institución única.PACIENTES:Fueron 143 pacientes con cáncer anal en estadio I-III que fueron tratados con quimiorradiación y completaron la encuesta.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Resultados reportados por el paciente que reflejan la función intestinal, sexual, y urinaria.RESULTADOS:Treinta y nueve por ciento de los pacientes tenían puntajes importantes de síndrome de resección anterior bajo al inicio del estudio. Las puntuaciones del síndrome de resección anterior baja mayor permanecieron estables (38 %; IC del 95%: 31 %, 46 %) sin cambios con el tiempo (OR 0,95, IC del 95%: 0,74, 1,21, p = 0,7). Se observaron tasas más altas de puntuaciones del síndrome de resección anterior baja mayor para los pacientes que tenían puntuaciones del síndrome de resección anterior baja mayor desde el inicio (OR 20,7; IC del 95%: 4,70; 91,3, p < 0,001) y para las mujeres (OR 2,14; IC del 95%: 1,01, 4,56; p = 0,047). En escalas de 5 puntos, observamos un aumento no significativo del nivel de excitación sexual durante la actividad sexual después de la terapia para las mujeres (β durante 1 año = 0,15; IC del 95%: -0,01, 0,32; p = 0,072) y una disminución no significativa de la confianza en lograr y mantener una erección después de la terapia para hombres (β para 1 año = -0,33; IC del 95%: -0,66, 0,00; p = 0,053).LIMITACIONES:Este es un estudio de una sola institución. Solo se incluyeron en el estudio los pacientes que contestaron el cuestionario.CONCLUSIONES:Una proporción significativa de pacientes tienen puntajes de síndrome de resección anterior muy bajos al inicio del estudio y después de un tratamiento exitoso para el cáncer anal. Tener puntajes de síndrome de resección anterior bajos importantes al inicio del estudio fue el predictor más importante de tener puntajes de síndrome de resección anterior bajos importantes después del tratamiento. La función intestinal, sexual y urinaria no mejoró con el tiempo hasta 2 años después de finalizar el tratamiento. Los médicos deben aconsejar a sus pacientes antes del tratamiento que la mala función intestinal inicial es un factor de riesgo para la disfunción intestinal posterior al tratamiento. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C29 . (Traducción-Dr. Yolanda Colorado )., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2022.)

Background: Current guidelines recommend restaging with MRI after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer, but the accuracy of restaging MRI in estimating circumferential margin involvement requires additional clarification., Objective: The objective of this study was to measure the accuracy of circumferential resection margin assessment by MRI after neoadjuvant therapy and identify characteristics associated with accuracy., Design: MRI data were retrospectively analyzed for concordance with the findings of whole-mount pathology analysis of the corresponding surgical specimens. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify characteristics associated with accuracy., Setting: This study was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center., Patients: Included in the study were consecutive patients who underwent total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer between January 2018 and March 2020 after receiving neoadjuvant therapy and undergoing restaging with MRI., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome of this study included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for categorizing the circumferential resection margin as threatened; mean and paired mean differences were in proximity of the margin., Results: Of the 94 patients included in the analysis, 39 (41%) had a threatened circumferential resection margin according to MRI at restaging, but only 17 (18%) had a threatened margin based on pathology. The accuracy of MRI in identifying a threatened margin was 63.8%, with margin proximity overestimated by 0.4 cm on average. In multivariate logistic regression, anterior location of the margin and tumor proximity to the anal verge were independently associated with reduced MRI accuracy., Limitations: A limitation was the retrospective design at a single institution., Conclusions: The knowledge that MRI-based restaging after neoadjuvant therapy overestimates circumferential margin proximity may render some surgical radicality unnecessary and thereby help avoid the associated morbidity. With the recognition that MRI-based assessment of margin proximity may not be reliable for anterior margin and for distal tumors, radiologists may want to use greater caution in interpreting images of tumors with these characteristics and to acknowledge the uncertainty in their reports. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B814., La Irm En La Reestadificacin Luego De Terapia Neoadyuvante En El Cncer De Recto Sobrestima La Proximidad Del Margen De Reseccin Circunferencial Segn Lo Determinado Comparativamente Con La Pieza De Anatomopatologa: ANTECEDENTES:Las pautas actuales recomiendan la re-estadificación por medio de la resonancia magnética luego de terapia neoadyuvante en los casos de cáncer de recto, pero la precisión de la reevaluación con la IRM para estimar el grado de implicación del margen circunferencial requiere aclaraciones adicionales.OBJETIVO:Medir el grado de exactitud en la evaluación del margen de resección circunferencial mediante resonancia magnética después de la terapia neoadyuvante e identificar las características asociadas con la precisión.DISEÑO:Se analizaron retrospectivamente los datos de resonancia magnética para determinar la concordancia entre los hallazgos del análisis de la pieza de anatamopatología y las muestras quirúrgicas correspondientes. Se realizó el análisis de regresión logística univariada y multivariada para identificar las características asociadas con la exactitud.AJUSTE:Centro oncológico integral.PACIENTES:Todos aquellos que se sometieron consecutivamente a una excisión total del mesorrecto por cáncer rectal entre Enero 2018 y Febrero 2020 luego de recibir terapia neoadyuvante y someterse a una re-estadificación por imágenes de resonancia magnética (IRM).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La exactitud, la sensibilidad y especificidad; los valores predictivos positivos y negativos para categorizar el margen de resección circunferencial como amenazado; la diferencia media y las medias pareadas de proximidad a los margenes.RESULTADOS:De los 94 pacientes incluidos en el análisis, 39 (41%) tenían un margen de resección circunferencial amenazado según la resonancia magnética en la re-estadificación, pero solo 17 (18%) tenían un margen amenazado basado en la patología. La precisión de la resonancia magnética para identificar un margen amenazado fue del 63,8%, con la proximidad del margen sobreestimada en 0,4 cm en promedio. En la regresión logística multivariada, la ubicación anterior de los bordes de resección y la proximidad del tumor al margen anal se asociaron de forma independiente con la reducción en la precisión de la resonancia magnética.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo en una institución única.CONCLUSIONES:El saber que la re-estadificación basada en la IRM, luego de terapia neoadyuvante sobreestima la proximidad de la lesión a los márgenes circunferenciales, hace innecesaria cierta radicalidad quirúrgica complementaria, lo que ayuda a evitar morbilidad asociada. Reconociendo que la evaluación de proximidad de los márgenes de resección basada en la resonancia magnética, no puede ser confiable en casos de márgenes anteriores y en casos de tumores distales. Los radiólogos recomiendan tener más precaución en la interpretación de imágenes de tumores con estas características y reconocen cierto desasosiego en sus informes. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B814., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2021.)

Background: Retrospective studies suggest that watch-and-wait is a safe alternative to total mesorectal excision in selected patients with a clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy., Objective: This study aimed to determine the proportion of patients with rectal cancer who may benefit from watch-and-wait., Design: This study is a retrospective analysis of data from prospectively maintained databases., Setting: This study was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center., Patients: Consecutive patients with stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma who were treated with total neoadjuvant therapy using induction chemotherapy between 2012 and 2019 under the care of the same surgeon were included., Intervention: Induction-type total neoadjuvant therapy consisted of 8 cycles of leucovorin-fluorouracil-oxaliplatin or 5 cycles of capecitabine-oxaliplatin before chemoradiotherapy. Patients with a clinical complete response were offered watch-and-wait, and patients with residual tumor were offered total mesorectal excision., Main Outcomes and Measures: Tumor response was assessed with a digital rectal examination, endoscopy, and MRI. Patient characteristics and recurrence-free survival were compared between the watch-and-wait group and the total mesorectal excision group., Results: A total of 88 patients were included in the analysis. One (1%) died during neoadjuvant therapy. Fifty-five patients (62.5%) had an incomplete clinical response and underwent surgery, 10 (18%) of the 55 developed distant metastasis, and 3 (5%) developed local recurrence. The remaining 32 patients (36.3%) had a clinical complete response and underwent watch-and-wait. On average, patients in the watch-and-wait group were older and had smaller, more distal tumors compared with patients in the surgery group. The median radiation dose, number of chemotherapy cycles, rate of adverse events, and length of follow-up did not differ substantively between the total mesorectal excision group and the watch-and-wait group. In the watch-and-wait group, 2 (6%) patients developed tumor regrowth, and one of them had distant metastasis. Recurrence-free survival was significantly higher in the watch-and-wait group., Limitations: Generalizability, sample size, and follow-up duration were limitations of this study., Conclusions: Approximately one-third of patients with stage II or III rectal cancer can benefit from a watch-and-wait approach with the aim of preserving the rectum if treated with induction-type total neoadjuvant therapy and followed by an experienced multidisciplinary team. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B688., Conservacin De Rganos En Pacientes Con Cncer De Recto Tratados Con Terapia Neoadyuvante Total: ANTECEDENTES:Estudios retrospectivos sugieren que observar y esperar es una alternativa segura a la escisión mesorrectal total en pacientes seleccionados con una respuesta clínica completa después de la quimiorradioterapia.OBJETIVO:Determinar la proporción de pacientes con cáncer de recto que pueden beneficiarse de observar y esperar.DISEÑO:Análisis retrospectivo de datos de bases de datos mantenidas de forma prospectiva.ESCENARIO:Centro Oncológico Integral.PACIENTES:Pacientes consecutivos con adenocarcinoma de recto en estadio II o III tratados con TNT utilizando quimioterapia de inducción entre 2012 y 2019 bajo el cuidado del mismo cirujano.INTERVENCIÓN:La terapia neoadyuvante total de tipo inducción consistió en ocho ciclos de leucovorín-fluorouracilo-oxaliplatino o cinco ciclos de capecitabina-oxaliplatino antes de la quimiorradioterapia. A los pacientes con una respuesta clínica completa se les ofreció observar y esperar, y a los pacientes con tumor residual se les ofreció la escisión mesorrectal total.PRINCIPALES RESULTADOS Y MEDIDAS:La respuesta del tumor se evaluó con un tacto rectal, endoscopia y resonancia magnética. Se compararon las características de los pacientes y la supervivencia libre de recurrencia entre el grupo de observación y espera y el grupo de escisión mesorrectal total.RESULTADOS:Se incluyó en el análisis a un total de 88 pacientes. Uno (1%) murió durante la terapia neoadyuvante. Cincuenta y cinco pacientes (62.5%) tuvieron una respuesta clínica incompleta y se sometieron a cirugía; 10 (18%) de los 55 desarrollaron metástasis a distancia y 3 (5%) desarrollaron recidiva local. Los 32 pacientes restantes (36.3%) tuvieron una cCR (respuesta clínica completa) y se sometieron a observar y esperar. En promedio, los pacientes del grupo de observación y espera eran mayores y tenían tumores más pequeños y distales en comparación con el grupo de cirugía. La dosis mediana de radiación, el número de ciclos de quimioterapia, la tasa de eventos adversos y la duración del seguimiento no difirieron sustancialmente entre el grupo de escisión mesorrectal total y el grupo de observación y espera. En el grupo de observación y espera, 2 (6%) pacientes desarrollaron recrecimiento del tumor y uno de ellos tuvo metástasis a distancia. La supervivencia libre de recurrencia fue significativamente mayor en el grupo de observación y espera.LIMITACIONES:Generalizabilidad, tamaño de la muestra, duración del seguimiento.CONCLUSIONES:Aproximadamente un tercio de los pacientes con cáncer de recto en estadio II o III pueden beneficiarse de un abordaje de observación y espera con el objetivo de preservar el recto si se tratan con terapia neoadyuvante total de tipo inducción y son seguidos por un equipo multidisciplinario experimentado. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B688., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2021.)

Background: The Clavien-Dindo classification is widely used to report postoperative morbidity but may underestimate the severity of colectomy complications., Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess how well the Clavien-Dindo classification represents the severity of all grades of complications after colectomy using cost of care modeling., Design: This was a retrospective cohort study., Settings: The study was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center., Patients: Consecutive patients (N = 1807) undergoing elective colon or rectal resections without a stoma performed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2009 and 2014 who were followed up for ≥90 days, were not transferred to other hospitals, and did not receive intraperitoneal chemotherapy were included in the study., Main Outcome Measures: Complication severity was measured by the highest-grade complication per patient and attributable outpatient and inpatient costs. Associations were evaluated between patient complication grade and cost during 3 time periods: the 90 days after surgery, index admission, and postdischarge (<90 d)., Results: Of the 1807 patients (median age = 62 y), 779 (43%) had a complication; 80% of these patients had only grade 1 or 2 complications. Increasing patient complication grade correlated with 90-day cost, driven by inpatient cost differences (p < 0.001). For grade 1 and 2 patients, most costs were incurred after discharge and were the same between these grade categories. Among patients with a single complication (52%), there was no difference in index hospitalization, postdischarge, or total 90-day costs between grade 1 and 2 categories., Limitations: The study was limited by its retrospective design and generalizability., Conclusions: The Clavien-Dindo classification correlates well with 90-day costs, driven largely by inpatient resource use. Clavien-Dindo does not discriminate well among patients with low-grade complications in terms of their substantial postdischarge costs. These patients represent 80% of patients with a complication after colectomy. Examining the long-term burden associated with complications can help refine the Clavien-Dindo classification for use in colectomy studies. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B521., Evaluacin De La Validez De La Clasificacin De Claviendindo En Estudios De Colectoma Anlisis Del Costo De La Atencin En Das: ANTECEDENTES:La clasificación de Clavien-Dindo es utilizada ampliamante para conocer la morbilidad posoperatoria, pero puede subestimar la gravedad de las complicaciones de la colectomía.OBJETIVO:Evaluar que tan bien representa la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo la gravedad de todos los grados de complicaciones después de la colectomía utilizando un modelo de costo de la atención.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:Centro oncológico integral.PACIENTES:Pacientes consecutivos (n = 1807) sometidos a resecciones electivas de colon o recto sin estoma realizadas en el Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center entre 2009 y 2014 que fueron seguidos durante ≥ 90 días, no fueron transferidos a otros hospitales y no recibieron quimioterapia intraperitoneal.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Gravedad de la complicación medida por la complicación de mayor grado por paciente y los costos atribuibles para pacientes ambulatorios y hospitalizados. Se evaluó la asociación entre el grado de complicación del paciente y el costo durante 3 períodos de tiempo: posterior a la cirugía (hasta 90 días), a su ingreso y posterior al egreso (hasta 90 días).RESULTADOS:De los 1807 pacientes (mediana de edad de 62 años), 779 (43%) tuvieron una complicación; El 80% de estos pacientes tuvieron solo complicaciones de grado 1 o 2. El aumento del grado de complicación del paciente se correlacionó con el costo a 90 días, impulsado por las diferencias en el costo de los pacientes hospitalizados (p <0,001). Para los pacientes de grado 1 y 2, la mayoría de los costos se incurrieron después del alta y fueron los mismos entre ambas categorías. Entre los pacientes con una sola complicación (52%), no hubo diferencia en el índice de hospitalización, posterior al alta o en el costo total de 90 días entre las categorías de grado 1 y 2.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo, generalizabilidad.CONCLUSIONES:La clasificación de Clavien-Dindo se correlaciona bien con los costos a 90 días, impulsados en gran parte por la utilización de recursos de pacientes hospitalizados. Clavien-Dindo no discrimina entre los pacientes con complicaciones de bajo grado en términos de sus costos sustanciales posterior al alta. Estos pacientes representan el 80% de los pacientes aquellos con una complicación tras la colectomía. Examinar la carga a largo plazo asociada a las complicaciones puede ayudar a mejorar la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo para su uso en estudios de colectomía. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B521., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2021.)

Background: The advent of immune checkpoint inhibition therapy has dramatically improved survival in patients with skin melanoma. Survival outcomes after resection of anorectal melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibition have not been reported., Objective: This study aimed to compare survival outcomes following surgical resection of anorectal melanoma between patients who received immune checkpoint inhibition and patients who did not., Design: This study is a retrospective analysis of data from a prospectively maintained database., Setting: This study was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center., Patients: Patients who underwent surgery for anorectal melanoma between 2006 and 2017 were included. They were stratified according to the use of immune checkpoint inhibition., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes measured were overall and disease-specific survival., Results: Of the 47 patients included in the analysis, 29 (62%) received immune checkpoint inhibition therapy. Twenty-two (76%) of the 29 patients received immune checkpoint inhibition after detection of metastasis or disease progression rather than in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. Overall survival did not differ significantly between patients who received immune checkpoint inhibition therapy and patients who did not (median, 52 and 20 months; 5-year rate, 41% vs 35%; p = 0.25). Disease-specific survival also did not differ significantly. Our analysis did not identify any clinical or pathological features associated with response to immune checkpoint inhibition therapy or with survival., Limitations: This study was limited by its relatively small sample and retrospective design and by the heterogeneous treatment regimen in the immune checkpoint inhibition group., Conclusions: Immune checkpoint inhibition therapy by itself does not appear to improve survival in patients who undergo resection or excision of anorectal melanoma. Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibition with other therapeutic modalities warrant further investigation. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B499. MELANOMA DE LA MUCOSA ANORRECTAL EN LA ERA DE LOS INHIBIDORES DEL PUNTO DE CONTROL INMUNOLÓGICO: ¿DEBEMOS DE CAMBIAR NUESTRO PARADIGMA DEL MANEJO QUIRÚRGICO: El advenimiento de la terapia de los inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico, han mejorado dramáticamente la supervivencia en pacientes con melanoma de piel. No se han informado los resultados de supervivencia después de la resección del melanoma anorrectal, tratado con inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico.Comparar los resultados de supervivencia después de la resección quirúrgica de melanoma anorrectal entre pacientes que recibieron y no recibieron inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico.Análisis retrospectivo de una base de datos mantenida prospectivamente.Centro oncológico integral.Pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía por melanoma anorrectal entre 2006 y 2017. Los pacientes fueron estratificados según el uso de inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico.Supervivencia global y específica de la enfermedad.De los 47 pacientes incluidos en el análisis, 29 (62%) recibieron terapia de inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico. Veintidós (76%) de los 29 pacientes recibieron inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico después de la detección de metástasis o progresión de la enfermedad, en vez de administración adyuvante o neoadyuvante. La supervivencia global no varió significativamente entre los pacientes que recibieron o no recibieron terapia de inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico (mediana, 52 y 20 meses, respectivamente; tasa a 5 años, 41% frente a 35%, respectivamente; p = 0,25). La supervivencia específica de la enfermedad tampoco varió significativamente. Nuestro análisis no identificó ninguna característica clínica o patológica, asociada con la respuesta a la terapia de inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico o con la supervivencia.Muestra relativamente pequeña y diseño retrospectivo. Régimen de tratamiento heterogéneo en el grupo de inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico.La terapia por sí sola, de inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico, no parece mejorar la supervivencia en pacientes que se someten a resección o escisión de melanoma anorrectal. Las combinaciones de inhibidores del punto de control inmunológico con otras modalidades terapéuticas, merecen una mayor investigación. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B499. (Traducción-Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy).

Background: For rectal cancer with unresectable metastases, current practice favors omitting interventions directed at the primary tumor in asymptomatic patients., Objective: This study aimed to determine the proportion of patients with primary tumor-related complications, characterize salvage outcomes, and measure survival in patients with metastatic rectal cancer who did not undergo upfront intervention for their primary tumor., Design: This is a retrospective analysis., Setting: This study was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center., Patients: Patients who presented between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2015, with synchronous stage IV rectal cancer, an unresected primary tumor, and no prior primary tumor-directed intervention were selected., Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measured was the rate of primary tumor-related complications in the cohort that did not receive any primary tumor-directed intervention. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to determine whether complications are associated with survival., Results: The cohort comprised 358 patients with a median age of 56 years (22-92). Median follow-up was 26 months (range, 1-93 months). Among the 168 patients (46.9%) who eventually underwent elective resection of the primary tumor, the surgery was performed with curative intent in 66 patients (18.4%) and preemptive intent in 102 patients (28.5%). Of the 190 patients who did not undergo an upfront or elective intervention for the primary tumor, 68 (35.8%) experienced complications. Nonsurgical intervention for complications was attempted in 34 patients with an overall success rate of 61.8% (21/34). Surgical intervention was performed in 47 patients (including 13 patients for whom nonsurgical intervention failed): diversion in 26 patients and resection in 21 patients. Of those 47 patients, 42 (89.4%) ended up with a colostomy or ileostomy., Limitations: This study was conducted at a single center., Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients with metastatic rectal cancer and untreated primary tumor experience primary tumor-related complications. These patients should be followed closely, and preemptive intervention (resection, diversion, or radiation) should be considered if the primary tumor progresses despite systemic therapy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B400. COMPLICACIONES RELACIONADAS CON EL TUMOR PRIMARIO Y RESULTADOS DE RESCATE EN PACIENTES CON CÁNCER DE RECTO METASTÁSICO Y UN TUMOR PRIMARIO NO TRATADO: Para el cáncer de recto con metástasis no resecables, la práctica actual favorece la omisión de las intervenciones dirigidas al tumor primario en pacientes asintomáticos.Determinar la proporción de pacientes con complicaciones relacionadas con el tumor primario, caracterizar los resultados de rescate y medir la supervivencia en pacientes con cáncer rectal metastásico que no se sometieron a una intervención inicial para su tumor primario.Análisis retrospectivo.Centro oncológico integral.Pacientes que se presentaron entre el 1 de enero de 2008 y el 31 de diciembre de 2015 con cáncer de recto en estadio IV sincrónico, un tumor primario no resecado y sin intervención previa dirigida al tumor primario.Tasa de complicaciones relacionadas con el tumor primario en la cohorte que no recibió ninguna intervención dirigida al tumor primario. Se utilizó el método de Kaplan-Meier y el análisis de regresión de Cox para determinar si las complicaciones están asociadas con la supervivencia.La cohorte estuvo compuesta por 358 pacientes con una mediana de edad de 56 años (22-92). La mediana de seguimiento fue de 26 meses (rango, 1 a 93 meses). Entre los 168 pacientes (46,9%) que finalmente se sometieron a resección electiva del tumor primario, la cirugía se realizó con intención curativa en 66 pacientes (18,4%) y con intención preventiva en 102 pacientes (28,5%). De los 190 pacientes que no se sometieron a una intervención inicial o electiva para el tumor primario, 68 (35,8%) experimentaron complicaciones. Se intentó una intervención no quirúrgica para las complicaciones en 34 pacientes con una tasa de éxito global del 61,8% (21 de 34). La intervención quirúrgica se realizó en 47 pacientes (incluidos 13 pacientes en los que falló la intervención no quirúrgica): derivación en 26 pacientes y resección en 21 pacientes. De esos 47 pacientes, 42 (89,4%) terminaron con una colostomía o ileostomía.Único centro.Una proporción significativa de pacientes con cáncer de recto metastásico y primario no tratado experimentan complicaciones relacionadas con el tumor primario. Se debe hacer un seguimiento estrecho de estos pacientes y considerar la posibilidad de una intervención preventiva (resección, derivación o radiación) si el tumor primario progresa a pesar de la terapia sistémica. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B400.

Background: A watch-and-wait strategy is a nonoperative alternative to sphincter-preserving surgery for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who achieve a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. There are limited data about bowel function for patients undergoing this organ-preservation approach., Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare bowel function in patients with rectal cancer managed with a watch-and-wait approach with bowel function in patients who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery (total mesorectal excision)., Design: This was a retrospective case-control study using patient-reported outcomes., Settings: The study was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center., Patients: Twenty-one patients underwent a watch-and-wait approach and were matched 1:1 with 21 patients from a pool of 190 patients who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery, based on age, sex, and tumor distance from the anal verge., Main Outcome Measures: Bowel function was measured using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument., Results: Patients in the watch-and-wait arm had better bowel function on the overall scale (median total score, 76 vs 55; p < 0.001) and on all of the subscales, with the greatest difference on the urgency/soilage subscale (median score, 20 vs 12; p < 0.001)., Limitations: The study was limited by its retrospective design, small sample size, and temporal variability between surgery and time of questionnaire completion., Conclusions: A watch-and-wait strategy correlated with overall better bowel function when compared with sphincter-preserving surgery using a comprehensive validated bowel dysfunction tool. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B218. FUNCIÓN EVACUATORIA INFORMADA POR PACIENTES EN CÁNCER RECTAL MANEJADO CON UNA ESTRATEGIA DE OBSERVAR Y ESPERAR DESPUÉS DE LA TERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE: UN ESTUDIO DE CASOS Y CONTROLES: Observar y esperar es una alternativa no operativa a la cirugía de preservación del esfínter para pacientes con cáncer rectal localmente avanzado que logran una respuesta clínica completa después de la terapia neoadyuvante. Hay datos limitados sobre la función evacuatoria en pacientes sometidos a este abordaje para preservación de órganos.Evaluar la función evacuatoria en pacientes con cáncer rectal manejados con observar y esperar comparado a pacientes sometidos a cirugía de preservación de esfínteres (escisión mesorrectal total).Estudio retrospectivo de casos y controles utilizando resultados reportados por pacientes.Centro especializado oncológico.21 pacientes se sometieron a observar y esperar y se compararon con 21 pacientes de un grupo de 190 pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía de preservación de esfínteres controlando por edad, sexo y la distancia del tumor al borde anal.Función evacuatoria utilizando un instrumento de valoración del Centro de Cáncer Memorial Sloan Kettering.Los pacientes de observar y esperar demostraron mejor función evacuatoria en la escala general (puntuación total media, 76 versus 55; p <0,001) y en todas las subescalas, con la mayor diferencia en la subescala de urgencia / ensuciamiento fecal (puntuación media, 20 versus 12; p <0,001).Diseño retrospectivo, numero de muestra pequeño y variabilidad temporal entre la cirugía y el tiempo de finalización del cuestionario.Observar y esperar se correlacionó con mejor función evacuatoria en general en comparación con la cirugía de preservación del esfínter utilizando una herramienta integral validada para la disfunción evacuatoria. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B218. (Traducción-Dr. Adrián Ortega).

Background: Intracorporeal anastomosis is associated with several short-term benefits. However, it is a technically challenging procedure with potential risk OBJECTIVE:: The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in short-term complications and long-term incisional hernia rates after robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomoses and standardized extraction sites., Design: This was a historical cohort study., Settings: The study was conducted at a single institution., Patients: All of the patients undergoing robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis and a Pfannenstiel extraction site or extracorporeal anastomosis with a vertical midline extraction site from 2013 to 2017 were eligible. Exclusion criteria were conversion to laparotomy for tumor-related reasons or lack of follow-up., Intervention: Intracorporeal or extracorporeal anastomosis was performed, based on availability of the robotic stapler and appropriate bedside assistance., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was incisional hernia, diagnosed either clinically or on postoperative imaging, and analyzed using time-to-event analysis. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariable analysis. Secondary outcomes were analyzed using parametric and nonparametric tests. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05., Results: Of 164 patients who met all inclusion criteria, 67 had intracorporeal and 97 had extracorporeal anastomoses. Median follow-up time was similar in both groups (14 vs 15 mo; p = 0.73). The 1-year estimated incisional hernia rate was 12% for extracorporeal and 2% for intracorporeal anastomoses (p = 0.007); this difference was confirmed by multivariable modeling. The severity of postoperative complications was similar between the groups, but there was an increase in incisional infections and a shorter length of stay (1 day) for intracorporeal cases., Limitations: The study was limited by its retrospective, single-surgeon nature., Conclusions: Right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis and a Pfannenstiel extraction site may reduce the rate of incisional hernias compared with extracorporeal anastomosis with a vertical midline extraction site. The intracorporeal approach was also associated with a decreased length of stay but an increase in incisional surgical site infections. These findings have implications for healthcare use and patient-centered outcomes. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B147. ANASTOMOSIS INTRACORPÓREAS EN COLECTOMÍAS DERECHAS MÍNIMAMENTE INVASIVAS SE ASOCIAN CON MENOS HERNIAS INCISIONALES Y UNA ESTADÍA HOSPITALARIA MÁS BREVE: nastomosis intracorpórea se asocia con varios beneficios a corto plazo. Sin embargo, es un procedimiento técnicamente desafiante con riesgos potenciales.nvestigar las diferencias en las complicaciones a corto plazo y las tasas de hernia incisional a largo plazo después de la colectomía robótica derecha con anastomosis intracorpórea versus extracorpórea y sitios de extracción estandarizados.Estudio de cohorte histórico.cirujano individual, institución única.Todos los pacientes sometidos a colectomía robótica derecha con anastomosis intracorpórea y un sitio de extracción de Pfannenstiel o anastomosis extracorpórea con un sitio de extracción vertical de la línea media de 2013-2017 fueron elegibles. Los criterios de exclusión fueron la conversión a laparotomía por razones relacionadas con el tumor o la falta de seguimiento.nastomosis intracorpórea o extracorpórea, según la disponibilidad de grapadora robótica y la asistencia adecuada quirúrgica.El resultado primario fue la hernia incisional, diagnosticada clínicamente o en imágenes postoperatorias, y analizada mediante análisis de tiempo hasta el evento. Se usó un modelo de riesgos proporcionales de Cox para el análisis multivariable. Los resultados secundarios se analizaron mediante pruebas paramétricas y no paramétricas. La significación estadística se estableció en p < 0,05.De 164 pacientes que cumplieron con todos los criterios de inclusión, 67 tenían anastomosis intracorpóreas y 97 tenían anastomosis extracorpóreas. La mediana del tiempo de seguimiento fue similar en ambos grupos (14 versus 15 meses, p = 0,73). La tasa de hernia incisional estimada para un año fue del 12% para las anastomosis extracorpóreas y del 2% para las anastomosis intracorpóreas (p = 0,007); esta diferencia fue confirmada por el modelado multivariable. La gravedad de las complicaciones postoperatorias fue similar entre los grupos, pero hubo un aumento de las infecciones incisionales y una estancia más corta (un día) para los casos intracorpóreos.Retrospectiva, cirujano único.a colectomía derecha con anastomosis intracorpórea y un sitio de extracción de Pfannenstiel puede reducir la tasa de hernias incisionales en comparación con la anastomosis extracorpórea con un sitio de extracción vertical en la línea media. El enfoque intracorpóreo también se asoció con una disminución de la duración de la estadía, pero con un aumento de las infecciones del sitio quirúrgico incisional. Estos hallazgos tienen implicaciones para la utilización de recursos médicos y beneficios para pacientes. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B147. (Traducción-Dr. Adrian Ortega).

Background: Adding modified FOLFOX6 (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) after chemoradiotherapy and lengthening the chemoradiotherapy-to-surgery interval is associated with an increase in the proportion of rectal cancer patients with a pathological complete response., Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze disease-free and overall survival., Design: This was a nonrandomized phase II trial., Settings: The study was conducted at multiple institutions., Patients: Four sequential study groups with stage II or III rectal cancer were included., Intervention: All of the patients received 50 Gy of radiation with concurrent continuous infusion of fluorouracil for 5 weeks. Patients in each group received 0, 2, 4, or 6 cycles of modified FOLFOX6 after chemoradiation and before total mesorectal excision. Patients were recommended to receive adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery to complete a total of 8 cycles of modified FOLFOX6., Main Outcome Measures: The trial was powered to detect differences in pathological complete response, which was reported previously. Disease-free and overall survival are the main outcomes for the current study., Results: Of 259 patients, 211 had a complete follow-up. Median follow-up was 59 months (range, 9-125 mo). The mean number of total chemotherapy cycles differed among the 4 groups (p = 0.002), because one third of patients in the group assigned to no preoperative FOLFOX did not receive any adjuvant chemotherapy. Disease-free survival was significantly associated with study group, ypTNM stage, and pathological complete response (p = 0.004, <0.001, and 0.001). A secondary analysis including only patients who received ≥1 cycle of FOLFOX still showed differences in survival between study groups (p = 0.03)., Limitations: The trial was not randomized and was not powered to show differences in survival. Survival data were not available for 19% of the patients., Conclusions: Adding modified FOLFOX6 after chemoradiotherapy and before total mesorectal excision increases compliance with systemic chemotherapy and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Neoadjuvant consolidation chemotherapy may have benefits beyond increasing pathological complete response rates. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A739.

Background: Little is known about anorectal function and quality of life after chemoradiation followed by local excision, which is an alternative to total mesorectal excision for selected patients with early rectal cancer., Objective: The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess anorectal function and health-related quality of life of patients with T2N0 rectal cancer who were treated with an alternative approach., Design: This was a prospective, phase II trial., Settings: The study was multicentric (American College of Surgeons Oncology Group trial Z6041)., Interventions: Patients with stage cT2N0 rectal adenocarcinomas were treated with an oxaliplatin/capecitabine-based chemoradiation regimen followed by local excision., Main Outcome Measures: Anorectal function and quality of life were assessed at enrollment and 1 year postoperatively with the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal Questionnaire. Results were compared, and multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictors of outcome., Results: Seventy-one patients (98%) were evaluated at enrollment and 66 (92%) at 1 year. Compared with baseline, no significant differences were found on Fecal Incontinence Severity Index scores at 1 year. Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life results were significantly worse in the lifestyle (p < 0.001), coping/behavior (p < 0.001), and embarrassment (p = 0.002) domains. There were no differences in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy overall score, but the physical well-being subscale was significantly worse and emotional well-being was improved after surgery. Treatment with the original chemoradiation regimen predicted worse depression/self-perception and embarrassment scores in the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life, and male sex was predictive of worse scores in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy overall score and trial outcome index., Limitations: Small sample size, relatively short follow-up, and absence of information before cancer diagnosis were study limitations., Conclusions: Chemoradiation followed by local excision had minimal impact on anorectal function 1 year after surgery. Overall quality of life remained stable, with mixed effects on different subscales. This information should be used to counsel patients about expected outcomes.

Background: Evaluating patients for recurrent anal cancer after primary treatment can be difficult owing to distorted anatomy and scarring. Many institutions incorporate endoscopic ultrasound to improve detection, but the effectiveness is unknown., Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of digital rectal examination and endoscopic ultrasound in detecting locally recurrent disease during routine follow-up of patients with anal cancer., Design: This study is a retrospective, single-institution review., Settings: This study was conducted at an oncologic tertiary referral center., Patients: Included were 175 patients with nonmetastatic anal squamous-cell cancer, without persistent disease after primary chemoradiotherapy, who had at least 1 posttreatment ultrasound and examination by a colorectal surgeon., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes measured were the first modality to detect local recurrence, concordance, crude cancer detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value., Results: Eight hundred fifty-five endoscopic ultrasounds and 873 digital rectal examinations were performed during 35 months median follow-up. Overall, ultrasound detected 7 (0.8%) mesorectal and 32 (3.7%) anal canal abnormalities; digital examination detected 69 (7.9%) anal canal abnormalities. Locally recurrent disease was found on biopsy in 8 patients, all detected first or only with digital examination. Four patients did not have an ultrasound at the time of diagnosis of recurrence. The concordance of ultrasound and digital examination in detecting recurrent disease was fair at 0.37 (SE, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.21-0.54), and there was no difference in crude cancer detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, and negative or positive predictive values., Limitations: The heterogeneity of follow-up timing and examinations is not standardized in this study but is reflective of general practice., Conclusions: Endoscopic ultrasound did not provide any advantage over digital rectal examination in identifying locally recurrent anal cancer, and should not be recommended for routine surveillance.

Background: Conventional MRI is limited in the assessment of nodal status and T status after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Multiparametric MRI strives to overcome these issues by directly measuring the local microcirculation and cellular environment, thus possibly allowing for a more reliable evaluation of response to therapy., Objective: We assessed the available literature for the value of multiparametric MRI sequences (diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging) in determining the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer., Data Sources: We conducted a systematic literature research in the PubMed database., Study Selection: English-language publications of the years 2000-2013 that applied multiparametric MRI in the neoadjuvant setting were included in this study., Intervention: Patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and MRI examinations for staging and assessment of response., Main Outcome Measures: Accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of MRI in prediction/assessment of response to therapy were the included measures., Results: Forty-three studies were included in this review; 30 of them included diffusion-weighted imaging sequences, and 13 included dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Conventional MRI is limited in the accuracy of both T and N stages and response assessment. Diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRIs showed additional value in both the prediction and detection of (complete) response to therapy compared with conventional sequences alone, as well as in correct N staging along with new experimental contrast agents., Limitations: The lack of standardization represents an important technical limitation. Most studies are conducted in an experimental setting; therefore, larger multicenter prospective studies are needed to verify the present findings., Conclusions: Advanced, functional MRI techniques allow for the quantification of tumor biological processes, such as microcirculation, vascular permeability, and tissue cellularity. This new technology has begun to show potential advantages over standard morphologic imaging in the restaging of rectal cancer, allowing for more accurate prognostication of response and potentially introducing an era allowing earlier treatment alteration and more accurate noninvasive surveillance, which could improve patient outcomes.

Background: Perianal Paget's disease (intraepithelial adenocarcinoma) is rare and sometimes difficult to diagnose because symptoms are nonspecific. It is often noninvasive but frequently recurs locally. Invasive disease can metastasize to distant sites., Objective: The purpose of this work was to review the diagnosis, management, and outcomes of patients with perianal Paget's disease., Design: Institutional databases were queried for all of the cases of perianal Paget's disease at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 1950 and 2011. Clinicopathologic factors were investigated for association with recurrence and survival., Settings: The study was conducted at a tertiary care center., Patients: Sixty-five patients with perianal Paget's disease were included in the study (35 women [54%]; median age at diagnosis, 66 years [range, 60-72 years]; and 41 with invasive disease/24 with noninvasive disease). A total of 56% with invasive disease were men., Main Outcome Measures: Measures included median follow-up, disease status, local and distant recurrence, sites of recurrence, disease-specific survival, overall survival, and treatment modality., Results: A total of 95% with invasive disease and 87% with noninvasive disease were symptomatic at presentation. The most common symptoms were pruritus and perianal bleeding. The duration of symptoms was longer in patients with invasive (12.0 months; range, 4.0-18.0 months) versus noninvasive (3.5 months; range, 1.0-10.0 months) disease. Synchronous malignancies unrelated to the primary disease were noted in 5 patients with invasive disease and 3 with noninvasive disease. Noninvasive disease was treated with a wide local excision and invasive disease with a wide local excision (n = 32, 78%) or abdominoperineal resection (n = 9, 22%). Forty-one patients (27 invasive and 14 noninvasive) required multiple operations for tumor clearance. In those with invasive disease, the median time to recurrence was 5 years, and the median tumor-specific survival rate was 10 years., Limitations: This was a retrospective study, limited by selection bias., Conclusions: Perianal Paget's disease is associated with nonspecific symptoms, frequently delaying diagnosis. Wide local excision is the treatment of choice if negative margins can be obtained. Abdominoperineal resection should be considered for invasive disease. Local recurrence is common; follow-up includes periodic proctoscopy and digital examination. Invasive disease can metastasize to distant sites; follow-up should include the examination of inguinal lymph nodes and the imaging of liver and lungs.

Background: The standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is preoperative chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision. After surgery, tumors are classified according to the depth of tumor invasion, nodal involvement, and tumor regression grade. However, these staging systems do not provide information about the distribution of residual cancer cells within the bowel wall., Objective: This study aimed to determine the distribution of residual cancer cells in each layer of the bowel wall in rectal cancer specimens., Design: This was a secondary analysis of data from a prospective phase II study., Setting: This study was performed in a multi-institutional setting., Patients: Included were 153 patients with stage II or stage III rectal cancer., Interventions: Patients were treated with chemoradiation and surgery. The surgical specimen tumor tissue was analyzed, and the distribution of residual cancer cells in each layer of the bowel wall was determined., Main Outcome Measures: Statistical analysis was used to examine the correlation of residual cancer cells in each layer of the bowel wall with the clinical/pathologic stage and tumor regression grade., Results: Forty-two of 153 (27%) patients had complete response in the bowel wall (ypT0). Of the remaining 111 patients who had residual cancer cells, 5 (3%) were ypTis, 12 (8%) were ypT1, 41 (27%) were ypT2, 50 (33%) were ypT3, and 3 (2%) were ypT4. Of the 94 patients with ypT2-4 tumors, 12 (13%) had cancer cells in the mucosa, and 53 (56%) had cancer cells in the submucosa; 92 (98%) had cancer cells in the muscularis propria. Pretreatment cT correlated with the distribution of residual cancer cells. Tumor regression grade was not associated with the distribution of residual cancer cells after chemoradiation., Limitations: : Patients received different chemotherapy regimens., Conclusions: Residual cancer cells in rectal cancer specimens after chemoradiation are preferentially located close to the invasive front. This should be considered when designing strategies to diagnose complete pathologic response and when investigating the mechanisms of tumor resistance to chemoradiation.

Background: Lymph node metastasis is an important indicator of oncologic outcome for patients with rectal cancer. Identifying predictive biomarkers of lymph node metastasis could therefore be clinically useful., Objective: The aim of this study was to assess whether chromosomal copy number alterations can assist in predicting persistent lymph node metastasis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation therapy., Design: This is a nonrandomized, prospective phase II study., Setting: This study took place in a multi-institutional setting., Patients: Ninety-five patients with stage II (cT3-4, cN0) or stage III (any cT, cN1-2) rectal cancer were included., Intervention: Patients were treated with preoperative chemoradiation therapy followed by total mesorectal excision. Pretreatment biopsy tumor DNA and surgical margin control DNA were extracted and analyzed by oligonucleotide array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Chromosomal copy number alterations were correlated with persistent lymph node metastasis. Finally, a model for predicting persistent lymph node metastasis was built., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes assessed were whether chromosomal copy number alterations are associated with persistent lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer and the accuracy of oligonucleotide array-based comparative genomic hybridization for predicting lymph node metastasis., Results: Twenty-five of 95 (26%) patients had lymph node metastasis after chemoradiation. Losses of 28 chromosomal regions, most notably in chromosome 4, were significantly associated with lymph node metastasis. Our predictive model contained 65 probes and predicted persistent lymph node metastasis with 68% sensitivity, 93% specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 77% and 89%. The use of this model accurately predicted lymph node status (positive or negative) after chemoradiation therapy in 82 of 95 patients (86%)., Limitations: The patient cohort was not completely homogeneous, which may have influenced their clinical outcome. In addition, although we performed rigorous, statistically sound internal validation, external validation will be important to further corroborate our findings., Conclusions: Copy number alterations can help identify patients with rectal cancer who are at risk of lymph node metastasis after chemoradiation.

Purpose: The risk index category is a tool to predict and compare surgical site infection rates among surgeons and hospitals. However, the accuracy of the index in colorectal surgery has been questioned because the index was validated in a patient population with lower surgical site infection rates than recently reported in the literature. This study aims to validate the risk index category as a predictor of surgical site infection in a cohort of patients who underwent colorectal operations and were prospectively surveyed for surgical site infection., Methods: Demographics, preoperative characteristics, and surgical data were obtained from 491 consecutive patients undergoing elective colorectal resections at a colorectal unit from April 2006 to July 2008. Surgical site infections were prospectively collected and stratified according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Association of variables with surgical site infection was determined by univariate and multivariate analyses., Results: A total of 95 (19.3%) patients developed surgical site infections. The rate of infection increased in each index category, from 13% for category 0 to 27% for category 3. Risk factors for surgical site infection in univariate analysis were as follows: high American Society of Anesthesiologists' scores, obesity, open surgery, and high index categories. Risk index category > or =2 (OR, 2.3; CI, 1.4-3.9; P < .01) was the only independent risk factor associated with infection in multivariate analysis., Conclusion: The risk index category is a strong predictor for the development of surgical site infection in colorectal surgery patients when infections are prospectively collected and should be used to stratify patients when reporting infection rates in elective colorectal surgery.

Purpose: The primary goal of the Surgical Care Improvement Project is to improve quality of care by implementing evidence-based health care practices that prevent surgical complications. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that an increase in compliance with quality process measures decreases the rate of surgical site infections in patients undergoing colorectal surgeries., Methods: A multidisciplinary task force implemented and monitored compliance with individual quality measures in patients undergoing elective colorectal resections at a tertiary institution. Individual compliance rates and infections were collected prospectively and reviewed monthly. For data analysis, patients were assigned to 2 consecutive 14-month periods: period A (April 1, 2006 to May 31, 2007) and period B (June 1, 2007 to July 31, 2008). Comparisons between periods were performed to determine the association of compliance with process measures and outcomes in infections., Results: A total of 491 consecutive patients were treated during the study periods (period A: n = 238; period B: n = 253). There were no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics, diagnoses, or surgical procedures between periods. Compliance with all process measures significantly increased within periods except for perioperative glucose control. Global compliance (compliance with all measures per patient) significantly improved from period A to B (40%-68%, respectively; P < .001). In total, 99 patients (19%) developed surgical site infections (period A, 18.9%; period B, 19.4%)., Conclusion: An increase in compliance with the Surgical Care Improvement Project aimed to prevent surgical site infections does not translate into a significant reduction of surgical site infections in patients undergoing colorectal resections.

Purpose: Treatments for transsphincteric, cryptoglandular anal fistulas pose risks for high recurrence rates and impaired anal continence. Anal fistula plugs have gained popularity because of reports of success without compromising the anal sphincter. To examine the benefit of the anal fistula plug, we compared its success rate with a standard treatment for transsphincteric fistulas with similar indications, the transanal mucosal advancement flap., Methods: We examined the outcomes of all patients with transsphincteric fistulas who underwent anal fistula plug repair from July 2005 to December 2006, excluding those with Crohn's disease or less than three months of follow-up. They were compared with a historical control group of patients (2001-2005) with similar transsphincteric fistulas who underwent a transanal mucosal advancement flap procedure because the anal fistula plug was not available. The same surgeons performed both procedures. Outcome was assessed from medical records or telephone follow-up., Results: Twenty-nine patients underwent an anal fistula plug repair, and 26 patients underwent a flap procedure. Fistula closure rates were 34 percent for plugs and 62 percent for flaps (P = 0.045). The groups were similar in all respects except that 3 percent of plug patients and 58 percent of flap patients had postoperative inpatient stays and the median follow-up was longer (279 vs. 819 days) for the flap group., Conclusion: Fistula closure rates were significantly lower with anal fistula plugs than with advancement flaps. Although the low success rates for fistula plugs could be a result of patient selection, more data needs to be accrued before fistula plugs can be recommended as definitive first-line treatment for transsphincteric fistulas.

Purpose: The goal of this study was to determine the rate of surgical site infection and compliance with process measures designed to prevent infection in a defined population of patients undergoing colorectal operations., Methods: A task-force consisting of surgeons, hospital infection control personnel, anesthesiologists, and nurses was convened to enforce the use of process measures to prevent infections. We monitored antibiotic selection, dosage, timing, redosing and discontinuation, hair removal technique, intraoperative and postoperative body temperature, and perioperative glucose control for 12 months by using electronic medical records. Patients underwent a minimum of 30 days of postoperative follow-up and the attending surgeon diagnosed infections., Results: Between April 2006 and March 2007, 298 patients underwent abdominal colorectal operations. The overall infection rate was 20 percent for colon procedures and 11 percent for small-bowel procedures. Compliance for most process measures improved from the first to the fourth quarter, and during the final quarter, correct antibiotic dose and hair removal with clippers exceeded 90 percent., Conclusions: The rate of surgical site infection after colorectal surgery is likely to be higher than that reported in national quality improvement programs. Perfect compliance with performance measures may be difficult to attain.

Purpose: Rectourethral fistula is a rare complication of pelvic surgery, trauma, or inflammation. The many techniques for repairing these fistulas vary in their success rates. Our goal was to describe the use of a dartos muscle interposition flap for repair of these fistulas., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of eight patients who underwent repair of a rectourethral fistula with a dartos muscle interposition flap. We describe the success rate and patient-related factors that may have affected success. The technique of dartos muscle interposition is described and compared with other previously described techniques., Results: Six of eight patients had healing of their fistulas documented by follow-up cystogram., Conclusions: Dartos muscle interposition is a straightforward technique that can result in successful fistula repair but should not be used in patients with risk factors for poor wound healing, such as an immunocompromised state or previous radiation therapy.

Purpose: A positive circumferential resection margin is associated with a high risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. The mesorectum is thinner anteriorly than posteriorly, and the risk of a positive resection margin may be higher for anterior than for posterior tumors. We sought to determine the effect of the tumor's position in the circumference of the rectum on the treatment and outcomes of rectal cancer patients treated by total mesorectal excision., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 401 patients with rectal cancer staged by preoperative endorectal ultrasound and treated by sharp mesorectal excision with or without neoadjuvant therapy. Tumors were classified into four groups (anterior, posterior, lateral, and circumferential) according to the location of deepest point of penetration on endorectal ultrasound. Differences in recurrence and survival rates were analyzed with logistic regression analysis., Results: Of the 401 tumors, 27 percent were anterior, 26 percent posterior, 32 percent lateral, and 15 percent circumferential. The groups did not differ in age, gender, tumor distance from the anal verge, or tumor grade. The ultrasound and pathology stages were more advanced in the circumferential group, and the proportion of uT4 tumors was higher in the anterior group. Circumferential and anterior tumors were more likely to receive preoperative adjuvant radiation. After an average follow-up of 44 months, 20 percent of patients had developed recurrence (13 percent distant, 6 percent local, and 1 percent distant and local). Recurrence was associated with advanced tumor stage, tumor proximity to the anal verge, and no preoperative adjuvant therapy. Early tumor stage and preoperative chemoradiation were associated with lower recurrence and improved survival. When tumor stage was controlled for, patients with poor or undifferentiated tumors and male patients with anterior tumors were shown to have a higher risk of recurrence or death. The estimated five-year disease-free survival for the entire group was 73 percent., Conclusions: Tumor stage is the main criterion to estimate prognosis in rectal cancer patients. The position of the tumor within the circumference of the rectum may provide valuable clinical information. Anterior tumors tend to be more advanced and, at least in male patients, has a higher risk of recurrence and death than tumors in other locations.

Purpose: This study was designed to investigate the role of a scheduled follow-up protocol using endorectal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of local recurrence after local excision and radical surgery for rectal cancer., Methods: A selected group of 275 patients with invasive rectal cancer followed prospectively by endorectal ultrasonography after curative-intent local excision (n = 108) or radical surgery (n = 167) was reviewed. For the radical-surgery group, results were compared with a group of 176 rectal cancer patients who had similar operations during the same period of time and were not entered in follow-up protocol. Excluded were patients with invasive cancers removed by snare excision, male patients treated by abdominoperineal resection, and patients treated by endocavitary radiation. Student's unpaired t-test was used to compare tumor and patient characteristics. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test., Results: In the local-excision group, 32 patients developed local recurrence, 26 (81 percent) were asymptomatic, and 10 of them (31 percent) were diagnosed only by endorectal ultrasound. We found no difference in the rates of salvage surgery or survival between patients diagnosed of recurrence by ultrasound or other methods. In the radical-surgery group, 12 patients developed local recurrence, 5 (42 percent) were asymptomatic, and 4 of them (33 percent) were diagnosed only by endorectal ultrasound. More patients with isolated local recurrence in the follow-up group underwent salvage surgery (4/9 patients; 44 percent) compared with patients without follow-up (3/13 patients; 23 percent), but the differences were not significant., Conclusions: Endorectal ultrasound identifies one-third of asymptomatic local recurrences that were missed by digital examination or proctoscopic examination. However, the impact of the earlier diagnosis in patient survival can only be determined by a larger, prospective, randomized trial.

Purpose: Subtotal colectomy reliably increases bowel-movement frequency in patients with slow-transit constipation, but its impact on quality of life is unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between functional outcomes and quality of life after subtotal colectomy for slow-transit constipation., Methods: We reviewed the charts and operative reports of all patients who underwent subtotal colectomy for slow-transit constipation from January 1992 to June 2001. We sent them a 54-question survey that inquired about bowel function and included a modified 36-item gastrointestinal quality-of-life index. Using Pearson's R, we correlated gastrointestinal quality-of-life index scores with specific functional outcomes., Results: Of 112 patients (109 females), 28 had been lost to follow-up and 2 had died. In all, 75 surveys (67 percent) were returned. Most of these 75 patients (81 percent) were at least somewhat pleased with their bowel-movement frequency, but 41 percent cited abdominal pain; 21 percent, incontinence; and 46 percent, diarrhea at least some of the time. The overall mean gastrointestinal quality-of-life index score was 103 +/- 22 of a maximum possible score of 144 (mean score for healthy controls, 126 +/- 13). We found no correlation between frequency of bowel movements and gastrointestinal quality-of-life index score (R = -0.03). Abdominal pain, diarrhea, and incontinence each had a statistically significant negative impact on gastrointestinal quality-of-life index scores (P = 0.01). Patients who required permanent ileostomy had low gastrointestinal quality-of-life index scores (68 +/- 24). The vast majority (93 percent) of patients stated they would undergo subtotal colectomy again if given a second chance., Conclusion: Subtotal colectomy for slow-transit constipation increases bowel-movement frequency; however, the persistence of abdominal pain and the development of postoperative incontinence or diarrhea adversely affect quality of life. Although most patients in the present study were satisfied with their results, quality-of-life scores should be used to assess postoperative outcome.

Purpose: Preoperative staging of rectal tumors is considered essential to tailor treatment for individual patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in preoperative staging of rectal tumors., Methods: Eleven hundred eighty-four patients with rectal adenocarcinoma or villous adenoma underwent endorectal ultrasonography evaluation at a single institution during a ten-year period. We compared the endorectal ultrasonography staging with the pathology findings based on the surgical specimens in 545 patients who had surgery (307 by transanal excision, 238 by radical proctectomy) without adjuvant preoperative chemoradiation. Comparisons between groups were performed using chi-squared tests and logistic regression analysis., Results: Overall accuracy in assessing the level of rectal wall invasion was 69 percent, with 18 percent of the tumors overstaged and 13 percent understaged. Accuracy depended on the tumor stage and on the ultrasonographer. Overall accuracy in assessing nodal involvement in the 238 patients treated with radical surgery was 64 percent, with 25 percent overstaged and 11 percent understaged., Conclusion: The accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in assessing the depth of tumor invasion, particularly for early cancers, is lower than previously reported. The technique is more precise in distinguishing between benign tumors and invasive cancers and between tumors localized to the rectal wall and tumors with transmural invasion. Differences in image interpretation may in part explain discrepancies in accuracy between studies.

Purpose: This study was designed to analyze the outcome for patients with isolated local recurrence after radical treatment of rectal cancer and to identify predictors of curative resection., Methods: The medical records of 87 patients who developed isolated local recurrence after curative radical surgery for primary rectal cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Survival rates from the time of recurrence were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Tumor stage and histology, patient characteristics, and treatment variables were analyzed using logistic regression to identify predictors of curative surgery., Results: Symptomatic treatment alone or chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy was provided to 23 patients (26 percent), and surgical exploration was performed in 64 patients. In 22 patients (25 percent), the tumor was considered unresectable at surgery (n = 13) or was resected for palliation with gross or microscopic positive margins (n = 9). In 42 patients (48 percent), curative-intent resection was performed. The only independent predictors of resectability were younger age at diagnosis, earlier stage of the primary tumor, and initial treatment by sphincter-saving procedure. There was no difference in survival between patients who had no surgery and those who had palliative surgery. The estimated five-year survival rate for patients who had curative-intent resection was better than for those who had no surgery or palliative surgery (35 vs. 7 percent; P = 0.01). Of the 42 patients who underwent curative-intent resection, 14 (33 percent) developed a second recurrence at a mean of 15 +/- 11 months after reoperation. Twenty-five percent of patients developed major complications., Conclusions: Salvage surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer may be helpful in a selected group of patients. The stage and treatment of the primary tumor may help to identify patients with the best chance for curative-intent resection.

Purpose: An aggressive surgical approach with en bloc resection of involved structures is often possible with anterior rectal cancers that invade adjacent visceral organs, but is rarely possible in tumors that invade the pelvic wall. However, most staging systems include both situations in the same group of T4 rectal cancers. We performed a retrospective study of patients with stage T4 rectal cancer undergoing surgery to assess the influence of different organ involvement on resectability and survival., Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 84 patients with T4 rectal cancer treated at the University of Minnesota and affiliated hospitals over a ten-year period. Forty-seven patients (56 percent) were staged for local invasion on the basis of final pathology, 19 (23 percent) on the basis of operative findings, and 18 (21 percent) on the basis of ultrasound images. Patients were divided into two groups, those with or without pelvic wall involvement. Resectability, local control, and overall survival were compared between groups. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed with Cox proportional and logistic regression., Results: Thirty-one patients (37 percent) had involvement of the pelvic wall, whereas 53 patients (63 percent) had visceral involvement only. All 29 patients with distant metastasis died of their disease. Forty-seven of the 55 patients without distant metastasis underwent tumor resection. Age and pelvic wall involvement were the only two factors independently associated with the probability of resection in logistic regression analysis (P = 0.0067 and P = 0.037, respectively). The only factor that affected median survival in patients without distant metastasis was tumor resection (49.1 months for resection vs. 6.1 months for no resection, P = 0.017). Patients with visceral involvement had a longer median survival (49.2 months) than those with pelvic wall involvement (13.2 months), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.058)., Conclusion: Rectal cancers with pelvic and visceral involvement have different rates of resectability and median survival. These differences should be reflected in the TNM classification system.

Purpose: This study was undertaken to assess results of surgery for fistula-in-ano and identify risk factors for fistula recurrence and impaired continence., Methods: We reviewed the records of 624 patients who underwent surgery for fistula-in-ano between 1988 and 1992. Follow-up was by mailed questionnaire, with 375 patients (60 percent) responding. Mean follow-up was 29 months. Fistulas were intersphincteric in 180 patients, transsphincteric in 108, suprasphincteric in 6, extrasphincteric in 6, and unclassified in 75. Procedures included fistulotomy and marsupialization (n = 300), seton placement (n = 63), endorectal advancement flap (n = 3), and other (n = 9). Factors associated with recurrence and incontinence were analyzed by univariate and multivariate regression analysis., Results: The fistula recurred in 31 patients (8 percent), and 45 percent complained of some degree of postoperative incontinence. Factors associated with recurrence included complex type of fistula, horseshoe extension, lack of identification or lateral location of the internal fistulous opening, previous fistula surgery, and the surgeon performing the procedure. Incontinence was associated with female sex, high anal fistula, type of surgery, and previous fistula surgery., Conclusions: Surgical treatment of fistula-in-ano is associated with a significant risk of recurrence and a high risk of impaired continence. Degree of risk varies with identifiable factors.

Purpose: This study was undertaken to compare the healing rate and long-term effects on continence of open and closed lateral internal sphincterotomy., Methods: Charts of 864 patients with chronic anal fissure who underwent internal sphincterotomy as a single procedure over five years by a group of 12 colorectal surgeons were reviewed. Open internal sphincterotomy (OIS) was performed in 521 patients, whereas 343 had closed internal sphincterotomy (CIS). There was no difference in sex or age between the groups. A questionnaire inquiring about clinical outcome, changes in continence, and degree of satisfaction with the procedure was mailed to all patients. A total of 549 (63.5 percent) patients, 324 (62.2 percent) with OIS and 225 (65.6 percent) with CIS, returned their questionnaires. Average follow-up was three (range, 1-6) years., Results: Differences in persistence of symptoms (3.4 OIS vs. 5.3 percent CIS), recurrence of the fissure (10.9 vs. 11.7 percent CIS), and need for reoperation (3.4 percent OIS vs. 4 percent CIS) were statistically not significant. However, statistically significant differences were seen in the percentage of patients with permanent postoperative difficulty controlling gas (30.3 vs. 23.6 percent; P 0.062), soiling underclothing (26.7 vs. 16.1 percent; P < 0.001), and accidental bowel movements (11.8 vs. 3.1 percent; P < 0.001) between those who underwent OIS and those who had CIS. Although 90 percent of patients reported general overall satisfaction, more patients undergoing CIS (64.4 percent) than OIS (49.7 percent) were very satisfied with the results of the procedure., Conclusions: Lateral internal sphincterotomy is highly effective in treatment of chronic anal fissure but is associated with significant permanent alterations in continence. CIS is preferable to OIS because it effects a similar rate of cure with less impairment of control.