Search

Study Design: Retrospective review of prospectively-collected registry data.Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine how different combinations of preoperative neck pain (NP) and arm pain (AP) influence functional outcomes, patient satisfaction, and return-to-work in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical radiculopathy (DCR).Summary Of Background Data: Surgeons often base decisions on the traditional belief that the predominance of radicular upper extremity symptoms is a stronger indication for cervical spine surgery than axial pain. However, there is a paucity of literature supporting this notion.Methods: A prospectively maintained registry was reviewed for all patients who underwent primary ACDF for DCR. Patients were categorized into three groups depending on predominant pain location: AP predominant ([APP]; AP > NP), NP predominant ([NPP]; NP > AP), and equal pain predominance ([EPP]; NP = AP). Patients were prospectively followed for at least 2 years.Results: In total, 303 patients were included: 27.4% APP, 38.9% NPP, and 33.7% EPP cases. The APP group was significantly older (P = 0.030), although there were no other preoperative differences among the three groups. After adjusting for baseline differences, the SF-36 Physical Component Summary was significantly better in the APP group at 6 months (P = 0.048) and 2 years (P = 0.039). In addition, they showed a trend towards better 6-month Neck Disability Index (P = 0.077) and 2-year SF-36 Mental Component Summary (P = 0.059). However, an equal proportion of patients in each group achieved the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for each outcome, were satisfied, and returned to work 2 years after surgery.Conclusion: Although patients with NPP had slightly poorer function and quality of life, all patients experienced a clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported outcomes, regardless of the predominant pain location. High rates of satisfaction and return-to-work were also achieved. In the context of proper indications, these findings suggest that ACDF can be equally effective for DCR patients with varying combinations of NP or AP.Level of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective review of prospectively-collected registry data.Objective: To compare the patient-reported outcomes, satisfaction, and return to work among a large cohort of patients stratified by preoperative myelopathy severity undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.Summary Of Background Data: Recent clinical practice guidelines noted a lack of studies stratifying their sample based on preoperative disease severity. The benefits of early surgical intervention for patients with mild myelopathy remain uncertain.Methods: A prospectively-maintained registry was retrospectively reviewed for all patients who underwent primary ACDF for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy. Patients were stratified based on severity of preoperative myelopathy symptoms according to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale: mild (>13), moderate (9-13), or severe (<9). Patients were prospectively followed for at least 2 years.Results: In total, 219 patients were included: 74 mild, 94 moderate, and 51 severe cases. The mild group had significantly better Neurogenic Symptoms (NS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), SF-36 Physical (PCS), and Mental Component Summary at baseline (P < 0.05). Neck and arm pain scores were similar at all time points. At 2 years, the severe group still had significantly worse patient-reported outcomes and lower rates of satisfaction, expectation fulfilment and return to work. However, they had significantly greater improvement in JOA, Neurogenic Symptoms, NDI, PCS, and Mental Component Summary, and a larger proportion attained minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for NDI and PCS. All three groups had similar proportions attaining MCID for JOA.Conclusion: Patients with severe myelopathy experienced a greater improvement after ACDF. Although fewer patients attained MCID, early surgical intervention for patients with mild myelopathy should also be considered, as this may allow patients to maintain their higher functional status. They also had high rates of postoperative satisfaction and return to work. The clinical trajectory outlined in this study may provide valuable prognostic information for patients.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective study using prospectively collected registry data.Objective: The authors examine the influence of preoperative mental health on outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and determine the impact of ACDF on postoperative mental health.Summary Of Background Data: While studies have reported a negative correlation between preoperative mental health and outcomes following lumbar spine surgery, the influence on outcomes following cervical spine surgery remains relatively understudied.Methods: Prospectively collected registry data of 104 patients who underwent single-level ACDF for cervical spondylotic myelopathy were reviewed. Patients were dichotomized into top and bottom halves based on preoperative SF-36 MCS (Mental Component Summary) using a cutoff of 48. Outcomes assessed were visual analogue scale for neck pain, arm pain, AAOS Neck Pain and Disability, Neurogenic Symptoms, Neck Disability Index, Short-Form 36, Japanese Orthopaedic Association myelopathy score, return to work, return to function, satisfaction and expectation fulfilment up to 2 years postoperatively.Results: The preoperative MCS was 37.5 ± 8.1 and 57.4 ± 6.3 in the Low and High MCS groups respectively (P < 0.001). The Low MCS group had poorer preoperative scores (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in length of stay or comorbidities (P > 0.05). The High MCS group had less neck pain (P = 0.002) and showed a trend towards lower Neck Disability Index (P = 0.062) at 2 years. The Low MCS group demonstrated greater improvement in Japanese Orthopaedic Association (P = 0.007) and similar improvement in other scores (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in proportion that achieved minimal clinically important difference for each score (P > 0.05). Both groups had similar rates of return to work, return to function, expectation fulfilment, and satisfaction (P > 0.05). Lower preoperative MCS was predictive of greater improvement in MCS (r = -0.477, P < 0.001).Conclusion: Despite relatively greater pain and disability at 2 years, patients with poor baseline mental health experienced similar improvement in clinical outcomes, return to work, and satisfaction rates.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]