Search

Study Design: Retrospective study using prospectively collected registry data.Objective: The authors examine the influence of preoperative mental health on outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and determine the impact of ACDF on postoperative mental health.Summary Of Background Data: While studies have reported a negative correlation between preoperative mental health and outcomes following lumbar spine surgery, the influence on outcomes following cervical spine surgery remains relatively understudied.Methods: Prospectively collected registry data of 104 patients who underwent single-level ACDF for cervical spondylotic myelopathy were reviewed. Patients were dichotomized into top and bottom halves based on preoperative SF-36 MCS (Mental Component Summary) using a cutoff of 48. Outcomes assessed were visual analogue scale for neck pain, arm pain, AAOS Neck Pain and Disability, Neurogenic Symptoms, Neck Disability Index, Short-Form 36, Japanese Orthopaedic Association myelopathy score, return to work, return to function, satisfaction and expectation fulfilment up to 2 years postoperatively.Results: The preoperative MCS was 37.5 ± 8.1 and 57.4 ± 6.3 in the Low and High MCS groups respectively (P < 0.001). The Low MCS group had poorer preoperative scores (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in length of stay or comorbidities (P > 0.05). The High MCS group had less neck pain (P = 0.002) and showed a trend towards lower Neck Disability Index (P = 0.062) at 2 years. The Low MCS group demonstrated greater improvement in Japanese Orthopaedic Association (P = 0.007) and similar improvement in other scores (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in proportion that achieved minimal clinically important difference for each score (P > 0.05). Both groups had similar rates of return to work, return to function, expectation fulfilment, and satisfaction (P > 0.05). Lower preoperative MCS was predictive of greater improvement in MCS (r = -0.477, P < 0.001).Conclusion: Despite relatively greater pain and disability at 2 years, patients with poor baseline mental health experienced similar improvement in clinical outcomes, return to work, and satisfaction rates.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective study using prospectively collected registry data.Objectives: To evaluate the effect of obesity on patient-reported outcome measures of pain, disability, quality of life, satisfaction, and return to work after single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).Summary Of Background Data: MIS-TLIF is an appealing alternative for obese patients with potentially lower complication risk. However, there is limited data investigating the influence of obesity on outcomes 5 years after MIS-TLIF.Methods: Prospectively collected registry data of 296 patients who underwent single-level MIS-TLIF at a single institution were reviewed. Patients had complete 2- and 5-year follow-up data. Patients were stratified into control (<25.0 kg/m), overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m), and obese (≥30.0 kg/m) groups. Outcomes assessed were visual analogue scale for back pain, leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, Short-form 36, North American Spine Society score for neurogenic symptoms, return to work (RTW), return to function (RTF), satisfaction, and expectation fulfilment. Length of operation, length of stay, and comorbidities were recorded.Results: Among the patients, 156 (52.7%) had normal weight, 108 (36.5%) were overweight, and 32 (10.8%) were obese. There was no difference in length of operation or hospitalization (P > 0.05). All three groups had comparable preoperative scores at baseline (P > 0.05). At 5 years, the control group had significantly higher PCS compared with the overweight (P = 0.043) and obese groups (P = 0.007), although the change in scores was similar (P > 0.05). The rate of MCID attainment, RTW, RTF, expectation fulfilment, and satisfaction was comparable.Conclusion: Nonobese patients had better physical well-being in the mid-term, although obese patients experienced a comparable improvement in clinical scores. Obesity had no impact on patients' ability to RTW or RTF. Equivalent proportions of patients were satisfied and had their expectations fulfilled up to 5 years after MIS-TLIF.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected registry data.Objective: To determine factors which influence return-to-work (RTW) in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and to determine if early RTW affects functional outcomes.Summary Of Background Data: MIS-TLIF has been associated with accelerated return to work. RTW in non-WC working-age adults after MIS-TLIF is not well understood.Methods: Prospectively collected registry data of 907 patients who underwent MIS-TLIF at a single institution from 2004 to 2013 were reviewed. One hundred ten working adults who underwent single-level MIS-TLIF with complete preoperative and 5-year postoperative follow-up data were included. Patients were assigned into Early RTW (≤60 d, n = 40) and Late RTW (>60 d, n = 70). All patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively at 2 and 5 years. Length of operation, length of stay, and comorbidities were also recorded.Results: The Early RTW group had significantly lower Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), North American Spine Society score for neurogenic symptoms (NASS NS), numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) back and leg pain scores than the Late RTW group (<0.01) There were no significant differences in age, body mass index (BMI) and prevalence of medical comorbidities (P > 0.05). In addition, there were no differences in terms of duration of surgery or length of hospitalization. There were no significant differences in ODI, NASS NS, Short-form 36 physical and mental component scores (SF-36 PCS/MCS), NPRS, satisfaction/expectation fulfilment between the Early and Late RTW groups at 2-year and 5-year follow-up. Both groups reported similar proportions that RTW without limitations and return-to-function (RTF) at 2-years and 5-years.Conclusion: Patients who RTW late have significantly poorer preoperative SF-36 physical component scores and higher ODI, NASS NS, NPRS back/leg pain scores. Surgeons should be cognizant that working adults with poorer preoperative function will tend to return to work later, but should reassure them that they will likely achieve similar clinical outcomes, satisfaction and expectation fulfilment when compared with patients who returned to work early.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective matched pair cohort study using prospectively collected registry data.Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with DM have poorer patient-reported outcomes and poorer fusion rates after undergoing a single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical myelopathy.Summary Of Background Data: ACDF remains the most common procedure in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM); however, there is a paucity of literature with regards to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) scores, and fusion rates post-ACDF in diabetic patients with CSM.Methods: From 2002 to 2012, 29 diabetic patients were matched with 29 nondiabetic controls. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and validated spine-specific scores including the Numerical Pain Rating Scale on Neck Pain and Upper Limb Pain, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) neck pain and disability scores, AAOS Neurogenic Symptoms Score, Neck Disability Index, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Score, and Short Form 36 Physical/Mental Component Summaries were recorded. Fusion rates based on Bridwell grading were assessed at 2 years.Results: After matching, there were no significant preoperative differences in patient demographics, clinical outcomes, PROMs or HRQoL measures between the DM and control group (P > 0.05). There was no difference in either length of hospital stay (P = 0.92) or length of surgery (P = 0.92) between the two groups. At 2 years postoperatively, there were no significant differences between validated spine-specific scores, PROMs, HRQoL scores, satisfaction rates, or fulfilment of expectations between the two groups. Significant poorer Bridwell fusion grades were noted in the DM group at 2 years postoperatively (P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis within the DM group demonstrated that glycated hemoglobin levels had no impact on functional outcomes, fulfilment of expectations, or patient satisfaction at 2 years (P > 0.05).Conclusion: Despite poorer fusion outcomes following single-level ACDF for symptomatic CSM, there was no significant difference in validated spine outcome scores, PROMs, HRQoL measures, or satisfaction levels when compared to nondiabetic controls at short-term follow-up.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]