Search

Abstract: Background: There is a paucity of data regarding acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) in the Gulf region. This study addressed this knowledge gap by examining patients experiencing AMI-CS in the Gulf region and analyzing hospital and short-term follow-up mortality. Methods: The Gulf-Cardiogenic Shock registry included 1,513 patients with AMI-CS diagnosed between January 2020 and December 2022. Results: The incidence of AMI-CS was 4.1% (1,513/37,379). The median age was 60 years. The most common presentation was ST-elevation MI (73.83%). In-hospital mortality was 45.5%. Majority of patients were in SCAI (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions shock classification) stage D and E (68.94%). Factors associated with hospital mortality were previous coronary artery bypass graft (odds ratio [OR]: 2.49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.321-4.693), cerebrovascular accident (OR: 1.621; 95% CI: 1.032-2.547), chronic kidney disease (OR: 1.572; 95% CI: 1.158-2.136), non-ST-elevation MI (OR: 1.744; 95% CI: 1.058-2.873), cardiac arrest (OR: 5.702; 95% CI: 3.640-8.933), SCAI stage D and E (OR: 19.146; 95% CI: 9.902-37.017), prolonged QRS (OR: 10.012; 95% CI: 1.006-1.019), right ventricular dysfunction (OR: 1.679; 95% CI: 1.267-2.226), and ventricular septal rupture (OR: 6.008; 95% CI: 2.256-15.998). Forty percent had invasive hemodynamic monitoring, 90.02% underwent revascularization, and 45.80% received mechanical circulatory support (41.31% had intra-aortic balloon pump and 14.21% had extracorporeal membrane oxygenation/Impella devices). Survival at 12 months was 51.49% (95% CI: 46.44%-56.29%). Conclusions: The study highlighted the significant burden of AMI-CS in this region, with high in-hospital mortality. The study identified several key risk factors associated with increased hospital mortality. Despite the utilization of invasive hemodynamic monitoring, revascularization, and mechanical circulatory support in a substantial proportion of patients, the 12-month survival rate remained relatively low., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the Shock Society.)

Aims: The impact of left ventricular dysfunction on clinical outcomes following revascularization is not well established in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCA). In this study, we evaluated the impact of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on clinical outcomes of patients with ULMCA requiring revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)., Methods: The details of the design, methods, end points, and relevant definitions are outlined in the Gulf Left Main Registry: a retrospective, observational study conducted between January 2015 and December 2019 across 14 centres in 3 Gulf countries. In this study, the data on patients with ULMCA who underwent revascularization through PCI or CABG were stratified by LVEF into three main subgroups; low (l-LVEF <40%), mid-range (m-LVEF 40-49%), and preserved (p-LVEF ≥50%). Primary outcomes were hospital major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and mortality and follow-up MACCE and mortality., Results: A total of 2137 patients were included; 1221 underwent PCI and 916 had CABG. During hospitalization, MACCE was significantly higher in patients with l-LVEF [(10.10%), P = 0.005] and m-LVEF [(10.80%), P = 0.009], whereas total mortality was higher in patients with m-LVEF [(7.40%), P = 0.009] and p-LVEF [(7.10%), P = 0.045] who underwent CABG. There was no mortality difference between groups in patients with l-LVEF. At a median follow-up of 15 months, there was no difference in MACCE and total mortality between patients who underwent CABG or PCI with p-LVEF and m-LVEF., Conclusion: CABG was associated with higher in-hospital events. Hospital mortality in patients with l-LVEF was comparable between CABG and PCI. At 15 months' follow-up, PCI could have an advantage in decreasing MACCE in patients with l-LVEF., (Copyright © 2022 Italian Federation of Cardiology - I.F.C. All rights reserved.)