Search

Background: Integrating sexually transmitted infection (STI) and preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) care may optimize sexual and reproductive health. Methods: We nested an STI substudy within a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention cohort (parent study) of 18- to 35-year-old women from South Africa, planning pregnancy with a partner with HIVor of unknown serostatus. Parent-study women completed annual surveys regarding HIV-risk perceptions and were offered oral PrEP. Preexposure prophylaxis initiators completed quarterly plasma tenofovir (TFV) testing. Substudy women completed STI screening at enrollment, 6 months, onset of pregnancy, and in the third trimester via examination, vaginal swabs tested via PCR for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Trichomonas vaginalis, Mycoplasma genitalium, and blood tested for Treponema pallidum. Followup was 6 months. Women with STIs were treated, offered partner notification (PN) cards, and surveyed regarding PN practices. We describe STI prevalence and incidence, and model factors associated with prevalent infection. Sexually transmitted infection substudy and parent study-only participants were matched on age and number of days on study to assess HIV-risk perception scores between the 2 groups and the proportion with detectable TFV. Results: Among 50 substudy participants, 15 (30%) had prevalent STI. All 13 completing follow-up reported PN. Most did not prefer assisted PN. Mean HIV risk perception scores and proportion with detected plasma TFV were similar across groups. Conclusions: High STI prevalence supports the importance of laboratory screening to optimize sexual health for women planning pregnancy. Rates of self-reported PN are reassuring; low interest in assisted PN suggests the need for alternative approaches. Enhanced STI care did not affect HIV-risk perception or PrEP adherence, however both were relatively high in this cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pretreatment HIV drug resistance (PDR) undermines individual treatment success and threatens the achievement of UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets. In many African countries, limited data are available on PDR as detection of recent HIV infection is uncommon and access to resistance testing is limited. We describe the prevalence of PDR among South African women with recent HIV infection from the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Trial. Methods: HIV-uninfected, sexually active women, aged 18–35 years, and seeking contraception were enrolled in the ECHO Trial at sites in South Africa, from 2015 to 2018. HIV testing was done at trial entry and repeated quarterly. We tested stored plasma samples collected at HIV diagnosis from women who seroconverted during follow-up and had a viral load >1000 copies/mL for antiretroviral resistant mutations using a validated laboratory-developed population genotyping assay, which sequences the full protease and reverse transcriptase regions. Mutation profiles were determined using the Stanford Drug Resistance Database. Results: We sequenced 275 samples. The median age was 23 years, and majority (98.9%, n = 272) were infected with HIV-1 subtype C. The prevalence of surveillance drug resistance mutations (SDRMs) was 13.5% (n = 37). Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) mutations were found in 12.4% of women (n = 34). Few women had NRTI (1.8%, n = 5) and protease inhibitor (1.1%, n = 3) mutations. Five women had multiple NRTI and NNRTI SDRMs. Conclusions: The high levels of PDR, particularly to NNRTIs, strongly support the recent change to the South African national HIV treatment guidelines to transition to a first-line drug regimen that excludes NNRTIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: HIV endpoint–driven clinical trials provide oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) as HIV prevention standard of care. We evaluated quantifiable plasma tenofovir among South African women who used oral PrEP during the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Trial. Methods: ECHO, a randomized trial conducted in 4 African countries between 2015 and 2018, assessed HIV incidence among HIV-uninfected women, aged 16–35 years, randomized to 1 of 3 contraceptives. Oral PrEP was offered onsite as part of the HIV prevention package at the South African trial sites. We measured tenofovir in plasma samples collected at the final trial visit among women reporting ongoing PrEP use. We used bivariate and multivariate logistical regression to assess demographic and sexual risk factors associated with plasma tenofovir quantification. Results: Of 260 women included, 52% were ≤24 years and 22% had Chlamydia trachomatis at enrollment. At PrEP initiation, 68% reported inconsistent/nonuse of condoms. The median duration of PrEP use was 90 days (IQR: 83–104). Tenofovir was quantified in 36% (n = 94) of samples. Women >24 years had twice the odds of having tenofovir quantified vs younger women (OR = 2.12; 95% confidence interval = 1.27 to 3.56). Women who reported inconsistent/nonuse of condoms had lower odds of tenofovir quantification (age-adjusted OR = 0.47; 95% confidence interval = 0.26 to 0.83). Conclusions: Over a third of women initiating PrEP and reporting ongoing use at the final trial visit had evidence of recent drug exposure. Clinical trials may serve as an entry point for PrEP initiation among women at substantial risk for HIV infection with referral to local facilities for ongoing access at trial end. Clinical trial number: NCT02550067. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]