Search

Objectives: To present our experience in an interdisciplinary and interprofessional morbidity and mortality conference, with special emphasis on its usefulness in improving patient safety., Design: Retrospective analysis., Setting: Tertiary interdisciplinary neonatal PICU., Patients: Morbidity and mortality conference minutes on 48 patients (newborns to 17 yr), January 2009 to June 2014., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: The authors' PICU implemented a morbidity and mortality conference guideline in 2009 using a system-based approach to identify medical errors, their contributing factors, and possible solutions. In the subsequent 5.5 years, there were 44 mortality conferences (of 181 deaths [27%] over the same period) and four morbidity conferences. The median death/morbidity event-morbidity and mortality conference interval was 90 days (range, 7 d to 1.5 yr). The median age of patients was 4 months (range, newborn to 17 years). In six cases, the primary reason for PICU admission was a treatment complication. Unsafe processes/medical errors were identified and discussed in 37 morbidity and mortality conferences (77%). In seven cases, new autopsy findings prompted the discussion of a possible error. The 48 morbidity and mortality conferences identified 50 errors, including 30 in which an interface problem was a contributing factor. Fifty-four improvements were identified in 34 morbidity and mortality conferences. Four morbidity and mortality conferences discussed specific ethical issues., Conclusions: From our experience, we have found that the interdisciplinary and interprofessional morbidity and mortality conference has the potential to reveal unsafe processes/medical errors, in particular, diagnostic and communication errors and interface problems. When formatted as a nonhierarchical tool inviting contributions from all staff levels, the morbidity and mortality conference plays a key role in the system approach to medical errors.

Objectives: Children with congenital heart disease and genetic disorders may be at increased risk for postoperative mortality and morbidity compared with children with congenital heart disease alone. The aim of the present study was to determine differences in postcardiopulmonary bypass outcome between these two groups., Design: Prospective cohort study., Setting: Tertiary university children's hospital., Patients: We enrolled 211 infants (<1 yr) who underwent bypass surgery for congenital heart disease. Data on perioperative course were compared between infants with and without genetic disorders. Univariate analysis was followed by regression analysis to control for confounders., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: We enrolled 148 infants without and 63 infants with a genetic disorder. The majority of infants with genetic disorders had trisomy 21 (n = 32), six had microdeletion 22q11, and 25 had other genetic disorders. There was no significant difference in mortality between infants with and without genetic disorders. An underlying genetic disorder was an independent risk factor for renal insufficiency (p = .003) and reintubation (p = .02). Trisomy 21 was an independent risk factor for chylothorax (p = .01) and sepsis (p = .05). The length of hospital stay was longer in infants with genetic disorders other than trisomy 21 compared with infants with trisomy 21 (p = .009)., Conclusions: Infants with congenital heart disease and genetic disorders are not at increased risk for postoperative mortality. However, a genetic disorder is a risk factor for reintubation and renal insufficiency, whereas infants with trisomy 21 have a higher risk of chylothorax and sepsis. Intensive care providers need to be aware of these differences in morbidity to improve management decisions and parental counseling.