Search

Objective: Substantial practice variation exists in the management of children with nonsevere traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH). A comprehensive understanding of rates and timing of clinically important tICH, including critical interventions and deterioration, along with associated clinical and neuroradiographic characteristics, will inform accurate risk stratification., Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of children aged younger than 18 years evaluated in the emergency department (ED) from May 1, 2014 to February 28, 2020 with tICH and initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of higher than 8. We determined rates of clinically important tICH after injury and within 96 hours of ED arrival, defined as immediate ED interventions (intubation, hyperosmotic agents, or neurosurgery within 4 hours of arrival) or clinically important deterioration (signs/symptoms with change in management). Associations between outcome and clinical and neuroradiographic characteristics were calculated using individual logistic regression models., Results: Our sample included 135 children. Clinically important tICH was observed in 13.3% (n = 18); 9 (6.7%) underwent immediate ED interventions and 9 (6.7%) developed deterioration. Most (93.3%, n = 127) presented with an initial GCS ≥ 14, including all children who later deteriorated. Initial GCS ( P = 0.001) and nonaccidental trauma ( P = 0.024) mechanism were associated with the outcome. None of the 71 (52.6%) children with initial GCS ≥ 14, isolated, nonepidural hemorrhage after accidental injury developed clinically important tICH., Conclusions: Clinically important tICH occurred in 13% of children with nonsevere tICH, and 7% of children who did not undergo immediate ED interventions later deteriorated, all of whom had an initial GCS ≥ 14. However, a subgroup of children was identified as low risk based on clinical and neuroradiographic characteristics., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To estimate rates of critical medical and neurosurgical interventions and resource utilization for children with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH)., Methods: This was a retrospective study of children younger than 18 years hospitalized in 1 of 35 hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System from 2009 to 2019 for ICH. We defined critical intervention as a critical medical (hyperosmotic agents and intubation) or neurosurgical intervention. We determined rates of critical interventions, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and repeat neuroimaging. We used hierarchical logistic regression to identify high-level factors associated with undergoing critical interventions, controlling for hospital-level effects., Results: There were 12,714 children with ICH included in the study. Median (interquartile range) age was 4.3 (0.7-11.0) years. Twelve percent (n = 1470) of children underwent a critical clinical intervention. Critical medical interventions occurred in 10% (n = 1219), and neurosurgical interventions occurred in 3% (n = 419). Intensive care unit admission occurred in 44% (n = 5565), whereas repeat neuroimaging occurred in 40% (n = 5072). Among ICU patients, 79% (n = 4366) did not undergo a critical intervention. Of the 11,244 children with no critical interventions, 39% (n = 4366) underwent ICU admission, and 37% (n = 4099) repeat neuroimaging. After controlling for hospital, children with isolated subdural (P = 0.013) and isolated subarachnoid (P < 0.001) hemorrhage were less likely to receive critical interventions., Conclusions: Critical medical interventions occurred in 10% of children with ICH, and neurosurgical interventions occurred in 3%. Intensive care unit admission and repeat neuroimaging are common, even among those who did not undergo critical interventions. Selective utilization of ICU admission and repeat neuroimaging in children who are at low risk of requiring critical interventions could improve overall quality of care and decrease unnecessary resource utilization., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Screening for urinary tract infection (UTI) includes urinary nitrite testing by dipstick urinalysis. Gram-negative enteric organisms produce urinary nitrite and represent the most common uropathogens. Enterococcus, a less common uropathogen, does not produce nitrite and has a unique antibiotic resistance pattern. Whether to adjust empiric antibiotics in the absence of urinary nitrite has not been established. Our primary objective was to determine prevalence of enterococcal UTI among young children with a nitrite negative urinalysis., Methods: A retrospective study of children aged less than 2 years evaluated in the emergency department for possible UTI and had a paired urinalysis and urine culture was performed. Urinary tract infection was defined by catheterized culture yielding greater than or equal to 50,000 colony-forming units per milliliter of a single uropathogen. Prevalence of uropathogens among nitrite negative samples was studied., Results: A total of 7599 children were studied. Median (interquartile range) age was 5.6 (2.3-11.2) months, and 57% were female. Prevalence of UTI was 8.1%. Enterococcus was the uropathogen in 2.1% of UTIs, and all cases had negative dipstick nitrite. Among nitrite negative UTIs, 95.6% of uropathogens were gram-negative and only 3.2% (confidence interval, 1.8%-5.3%) were enterococcus. None of the 200 UTIs with positive nitrite yielded enterococcus (upper confidence interval, 1.4%). Among children with positive leukocyte esterase and negative nitrite, only 0.7% of cases had enterococcal UTI., Conclusions: Only 3% of nitrite negative UTIs were caused by enterococcus. Given the low prevalence of enterococcal UTI, the absence of dipstick nitrite should not affect routine empiric antibiotic choice for presumptive UTI in young children.