Search

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of a nationwide database.Objective: The primary objective was to summarize the use of surgical methods for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc disease (HIVD) at two different time periods under the national health insurance system. The secondary objective was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis by utilizing incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).Summary Of Background Data: The selection of surgical method for HIVD may or may not be consistent with cost effectiveness under national health insurance system, but this issue has rarely been analyzed.Methods: The data of all patients who underwent surgeries for HIVD in 2003 (n = 17,997) and 2008 (n = 38,264) were retrieved. The surgical methods included open discectomy (OD), fusion surgery, laminectomy, and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). The hospitals were classified as tertiary-referral hospitals (≥300 beds), medium-sized hospitals (30-300 beds), or clinics (<30 beds). ICER showed the difference in the mean total cost per 1% decrease in the reoperation probability among surgical methods. The total cost included the costs of the index surgery and the reoperation.Results: In 2008, the number of surgeries increased by 2.13-fold. The number of hospitals increased by 34.75% (731 in 2003 and 985 in 2008). The proportion of medium-sized hospitals increased from 62.79% to 70.86%, but the proportion of surgeries performed at those hospitals increased from 61.31% to 85.08%. The probability of reoperation was highest after laminectomy (10.77%), followed by OD (10.50%), PELD (9.20%), and fusion surgery (7.56%). The ICERs indicated that PELD was a cost-effective surgical method. The proportion of OD increased from 71.21% to 84.12%, but that of PELD decreased from 16.68% to 4.57%.Conclusion: The choice of surgical method might not always be consistent with cost-effectiveness strategies, and a high proportion of medium-sized hospitals may be responsible for this change.Level Of Evidence: 4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.Objective: To provide an age cut-off of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) for optimal reoperation rate with nationwide population-based data.Summary Of Background Data: Open discectomy is the standard operation for lumbar herniated intervertebral disk disease (HIVD). PELD has shown noninferior outcome to open discectomy and there is increasing interest with regard to PELD. However, PELD may not be a suitable option for all age groups.Methods: We selected 15,817 patients who underwent open discectomy (n = 12,816) or PELD (n = 3001) in 2003 from the Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA) database. All patients in the cohort were followed until December 31, 2008, and the minimum follow-up period was 5 years. A time-to-event survival analysis was conducted. The primary endpoint was any type of second lumbar spine surgery during the follow-up period. Minimum P-value approach and a 2-fold cross-validation approach were utilized to determine an age cut-off point.Results: The optimal age cut-off point was determined as 57 years. PELD for older patients (≥57 years) had a higher reoperation risk during the postoperative 3.4 years (hazard ratio [HR] at 1 yr, 1.75; 2 yr, 1.57; and 3 yr, 1.41). However, the reoperation risk was not higher after PELD for patients younger than 57 years, from 1.9 years, than open discectomy (HR at 2 yr, 0.86; 3 yr, 0.78; 4 yr, 0.70; and 5 yr, 0.63).Conclusion: In the present study, we showed that an age cut-off point of PELD for optimal reoperation rate may be 57 years, based on nationwide population-based data. The reoperation rate does not seem to be higher for patients younger than 57 years after PELD than after open discectomy; however, PELD for older patients should be applied after careful consideration.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents information on a study related to longitudinal reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (HIVD) disease. The method includes cohort analysis of patients who underwent first surgery for herniated intervertebral disc disease. The results showed that cumulative reoperation rate was 13.4 percent after five years.