Search

Abstract: Mastocytosis is a condition characterized by accumulation of clonal mast cells (MCs) that often involves the skin. Pathologists are often challenged with skin biopsies with a question of cutaneous lesions of mastocytosis (CLM) including cutaneous mastocytosis, mastocytosis in the skin, or systemic mastocytosis. The histopathological criteria for CLM remain poorly defined due to heterogeneity of the published literature and the lack of comparative prospective studies. MC count is greatly influenced by detection and counting techniques, criteria for viable MCs used, anatomical location biopsied, and the dermal level that is analyzed. Although MC numbers in CLM can be significantly higher compared with healthy controls and a patient with other inflammatory skin diseases, in some instances, considerable overlap exists. Based on the largest studies published, it is suggested that a number of MCs between 75 and 250 MCs/mm 2 are a range in which CLM should be considered and, above 250 MC/mm 2 , a diagnosis of CLM can be made. A recent study showed a high specificity of >95% of a MC count >139 MC/mm 2 compared with patients with other inflammatory skin diseases. Noteworthy, the total number and percentage of MCs is significantly higher in children compared with adults, particularly in polymorphic maculopapular cutaneous mastocytosis. In difficult cases, ancillary techniques such as D816V mutation analysis on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue have a high sensitivity and specificity. There is no enough evidence that immunohistochemistry of CD25, CD2, or CD30 has any additional value in the diagnosis, subtyping, or clinical course of mastocytosis., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Immunodeficiency-associated lymphoproliferative disorders are associated with latent infection by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Most cases of EBV-positive immunodeficiency-associated lymphoproliferative disorders arise from B cells, although some are of T-cell or natural killer origin. Cutaneous involvement is unusual and sporadically reported in the literature. We describe a rare case of an EBV-positive T-cell lymphoma presenting in the skin of a 32-year-old woman using adalimumab for neurosarcoidosis., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune blistering disease that commonly affects elderly patients. Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) for immunoglobulin G (IgG) and C3c on frozen skin biopsies is the gold standard for the diagnosis of BP. In a minority of cases, IgG and/or C3c are found negative, and in these situations, there is a need for a more stable diagnostic marker of BP. C4d is biologically inactive, but has a long half-life, rendering it a long-lived marker for antibody-mediated complement activation. Previous studies already demonstrated that C4d was diagnostically useful in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded skin biopsies of patients with BP. We hypothesized that C4d detected by DIF could also be a promising diagnostic marker for BP, particularly in IgG and/or C3c DIF-negative cases. In this single-center retrospective study, 69 cases of BP were analyzed for linear deposition of C4d; of the 69 cases, n = 26 were IgG+/C3c-, n = 10 IgG+/C3c+, and n = 33 IgG-/C3c-. Results were compared with n = 39 negative controls. Seven of the 26 (27%) IgG+/C3c- and 3 of the 33 (9%) IgG-/C3c- BP cases were positive for C4d. All 10 IgG+/C3c+ cases were also C4d positive. In the negative control group, 2 of the 39 (5%) were found positive for C4d. In conclusion, the current study shows that C4d is a more sensitive but not a 100% specific marker of BP. We conclude that C4d by DIF could be an interesting diagnostic adjunct for BP, particularly in IgG-/C3c- double negative cases., Competing Interests: B. Horvath reports fees from Janssen-Cilag (advisory boards, educational grants, consultations, and investigator initiative studies), AbbVie (advisory boards, educational grants, consultations, and investigator initiative studies), Novartis Pharma (advisory boards, consultations, and investigator initiative studies), UCB Pharma (advisory boards and consultations), Leo Pharma (consultations), Solenne B. V. (investigator initiative studies), Celgene (consultations and investigator initiative studies), Akari therapeutics (consultations and investigator initiative studies), Philips (consultation), Roche (consultation), Regeneron (consultation), and Sanofi (consultation), fees which were paid to the institution. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Microalbuminuria is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events. We assessed whether therapeutic intervention aimed at lowering urinary albumin excretion would reduce cardiovascular events in microalbuminuric subjects (15 to 300 mg/24 hours)., Methods and Results: From the Prevention of Renal and Vascular Endstage Disease (PREVEND) cohort (n=8592), 1439 subjects fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the PREVEND Intervention Trial (PREVEND IT). Of these subjects, 864 were randomized to fosinopril 20 mg or matching placebo and to pravastatin 40 mg or matching placebo. The mean follow-up was 46 months, and the primary end point was cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for cardiovascular morbidity. Mean age was 51+/-12 years; 65% of subjects were male, and 3.4% had a previous cardiovascular event. Mean cholesterol level was 5.8+/-1.0 mmol/L, mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 130+/-18/76+/-10 mm Hg, and median urinary albumin excretion was 22.8 (15.8 to 41.3) mg/24 hours. The primary end point occurred in 45 subjects (5.2%). Fosinopril reduced urinary albumin excretion by 26% (P<0.001). Subjects treated with fosinopril showed a 40% lower incidence of the primary end point (hazard ratio 0.60 [95% CI 0.33 to 1.10], P=0.098, log-rank). Pravastatin did not reduce urinary albumin excretion, and subjects treated with pravastatin showed a 13% lower incidence of the primary end point than subjects in the placebo group (0.87 [0.49 to 1.57], P=0.649, log-rank)., Conclusions: In microalbuminuric subjects, treatment with fosinopril had a significant effect on urinary albumin excretion. In addition, fosinopril treatment was associated with a trend in reducing cardiovascular events. Treatment with pravastatin did not result in a significant reduction in urinary albumin excretion or cardiovascular events.