Search

Objectives: To evaluate the detectability of non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced spiral breast computed tomography ([non]-CE-SBCT) compared with mammography. Secondary objectives are to determine detectability depending on breast density and to evaluate appearance of breast malignancies according to BI-RADS descriptors., Methods: This retrospective institutional review board-approved study included 90 women with 105 biopsy-proven malignant breast lesions. Breast density, BI-RADS descriptors, and detectability were evaluated by 2 independent readers. Diagnostic confidence was rated on a 4-point Likert scale., Results: For readers 1 and 2, detectability was 83.8% and 80.0% for mammography, 99.1% and 99.1% for CE-SBCT ( P < 0.05), and 66.7% and 61.9% for non-CE-SBCT ( P < 0.05). With both readers, detectability in CE-SBCT was high for density A/B/C/D (both 100%/100%/100%/87.5%). Detectability of readers declined with increasing density for mammography (density A = 100%, B = 89.1% and 95.1%, C = 73.1%, D = 50.0% and 71.4%; P < 0.05) and for non-CE-SBCT (density A = 87.5% and 90.7%, B = 65.5% and 69.1%, C = 54.8% and 60.0%, D = 37.5%; P < 0.05). Mass lesions were detected with CT as often as with mammography, whereas architectural distortions and microcalcifications were detected less often with SBCT. Diagnostic confidence was very high or high in 97.2% for CE-SBCT, in 74.1% for non-CE-SBCT, and in 81.4% for mammography., Conclusions: Detectability and diagnostic confidence were very high in CE-SBCT, regardless of breast density. The detectability of non-CE-SBCT was lower than that of mammography and declined with increasing breast density., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: M.W. is part of the speaker bureau of Siemens Healthineers AG. E.W. is part of the speaker bureau of Siemens Healthineers AG and is a member of the advisory board of AB-CT and of Becton Dickinson GmbH. For the remaining authors, none were declared., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Clinical experience regarding the use of dedicated photon-counting breast CT (PC-BCT) for diagnosis of breast microcalcifications is scarce. This study systematically compares the detection and classification of breast microcalcifications using a dedicated breast photon-counting CT, especially designed for examining the breast, in comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)., Materials and Methods: This is a prospective intraindividual study on women with DBT screening-detected BI-RADS-4/-5 microcalcifications who underwent PC-BCT before biopsy. PC-BCT images were reconstructed with a noninterpolated spatial resolution of 0.15 × 0.15 × 0.15 mm (reconstruction mode 1 [RM-1]) and with 0.3 × 0.3 × 0.3 mm (reconstruction mode 2 [RM-2]), plus thin-slab maximum intensity projection (MIP) reconstructions. Two radiologists independently rated the detection of microcalcifications in direct comparison with DBT on a 5-point scale. The distribution and morphology of microcalcifications were then rated according to BI-RADS. The size of the smallest discernible microcalcification particle was measured. For PC-BCT, the average glandular dose was determined by Monte Carlo simulations; for DBT, the information provided by the DBT system was used., Results: Between September 2022 and July 2023, 22 participants (mean age, 61; range, 42-85 years) with microcalcifications (16 malignant; 6 benign) were included. In 2/22 with microcalcifications in the posterior region, microcalcifications were not detectable on PC-BCT, likely because they were not included in the PC-BCT volume. In the remaining 20 participants, microcalcifications were detectable. With high between-reader agreement (κ > 0.8), conspicuity of microcalcifications was rated similar for DBT and MIPs of RM-1 (mean, 4.83 ± 0.38 vs 4.86 ± 0.35) ( P = 0.66), but was significantly lower ( P < 0.05) for the remaining PC-BCT reconstructions: 2.11 ± 0.92 (RM-2), 2.64 ± 0.80 (MIPs of RM-2), and 3.50 ± 1.23 (RM-1). Identical distribution qualifiers were assigned for PC-BCT and DBT in 18/20 participants, with excellent agreement (κ = 0.91), whereas identical morphologic qualifiers were assigned in only 5/20, with poor agreement (κ = 0.44). The median size of smallest discernible microcalcification particle was 0.2 versus 0.6 versus 1.1 mm in DBT versus RM-1 versus RM-2 ( P < 0.001), likely due to blooming effects. Average glandular dose was 7.04 mGy (PC-BCT) versus 6.88 mGy (DBT) ( P = 0.67)., Conclusions: PC-BCT allows reliable detection of in-breast microcalcifications as long as they are not located in the posterior part of the breast and allows assessment of their distribution, but not of their individual morphology., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: none declared., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most effective imaging modality for breast cancer detection. A contrast agent-free examination technique would be desirable for breast MRI screening. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capability to detect and characterize suspicious breast lesions with an abbreviated, non-contrast-enhanced MRI protocol featuring ultra-high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) compared with CE images., Materials and Methods: The institutional review board-approved prospective study included 127 female subjects with different clinical indications for breast MRI. Magnetic resonance imaging examinations included DWI sequences with b-values of 1500 s/mm2 (b1500) and 2500 s/mm2 (b2500), native T1- and T2-weighted images, and CE sequences at 1.5 T and 3 T scanners. Two reading rounds were performed, including either the b1500 or the b2500 DWI in consecutive assessment steps: (A) maximum intensity projections (MIPs) of DWI, (B) DWI and apparent diffusion coefficient maps, (C) as (B) but with additional native T1- and T2-weighted images, and (D) as (C) but with additional CE images (full-length protocol). Two readers independently determined the presence of a suspicious lesion. Histological confirmation was obtained for conspicuous lesions, whereas the full MRI data set was obtained for inconspicuous and clearly benign lesions. Statistical analysis included calculation of diagnostic accuracy and interrater agreement via the intraclass correlation coefficient., Results: The cohort comprised 116 cases with BI-RADS 1 findings and 138 cases with BI-RADS ≥2 findings, including 38 histologically confirmed malignancies. For (A), breasts without pathological findings could be recognized with high diagnostic accuracy (negative predictive value, ≥97.0%; sensitivity, ≥92.1% for both readers), but with a limited specificity (≥58.3%; positive predictive value, ≥28.6%). Within the native readings, approach (C) with b2500 performed best (negative predictive value, 99.5%; sensitivity, 97.4%; specificity, 88.4%). The intraclass correlation coefficient was between 0.683 (MIP b1500) and 0.996 (full protocol)., Conclusions: A native abbreviated breast MRI protocol with advanced high b-value DWI might allow nearly equivalent diagnostic accuracy as CE breast MRI and seems to be well suited for lesion detection purposes., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Funding for the positions of F.B.L. and T.P. by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (LA 2804/12-1, project 326944748) is gratefully acknowledged., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Comparison of the diagnostic value of simultaneous multislice (SMS) accelerated diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging (EPI) of malignant and benign lesions of the breast compared with a reference EPI sequence., Materials and Methods: The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. Sixty-eight patients were examined with a diffusion-weighted EPI (reference EPI; TE = 54 milliseconds; TR = 9000 milliseconds; TA, 3:27 minutes) and a diffusion-weighted SMS accelerated EPI (SMS EPI; acceleration factor 2; TE = 58 milliseconds; TR = 4300 milliseconds; TA, 1:53 minutes) in addition to the standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol. Further acquisition parameters were as follows: 3 T MAGNETOM Skyra (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany), 2.5-mm isotropic resolution, field of view = 185 to 190 × 350 mm, 62 slices, b = 50 and 800 s/mm with 1 and 4 averages, respectively. A dedicated 16-channel bilateral breast coil was used for imaging. Image quality was evaluated with respect to the presence of artifacts, signal voids, and quality of fat suppression. These parameters were rated using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very strong to 5 = negligible). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was measured in 72 focal lesions (46 breast carcinomas and 26 benign lesions), and the diagnostic value of the 2 datasets was statistically evaluated and compared. The evaluation was performed a second time excluding cysts., Results: Artifacts and signal voids were negligible in both sequences (mean on Likert scale for reference EPI 4.68 vs SMS EPI 4.65, P = 0.52, and mean on Likert scale for reference EPI 4.85 vs SMS EPI 4.77, P = 0.14). Fat suppression was significantly better in SMS EPI (mean on Likert scale 3.28 vs 2.97, P < 0.001, Pearson r = 0.49). For benign lesions, the mean ADC in both EPI sequences was 1.86 · 10 mm/s. For malignant lesions, a mean ADC of 0.90 · 10 mm/s for the reference EPI and 0.89 · 10 mm/s for the SMS EPI was found. No significant difference between the EPI sequences was observed for ADC values (P = 0.75) and for the area under the curve (SMS, 0.985; no SMS, 0.975). The cutoff for differentiation of benign and malignant lesions was at ADC = 1.42 · 10 mm/s for SMS EPI (sensitivity, 1; specificity, 0.88) and at 1.23 · 10 mm/s for the reference EPI (sensitivity, 1; specificity, 0.92). Excluding the cysts, the cutoff for differentiation of benign and malignant lesions was at ADC = 1.11 · 10 mm/s for SMS EPI (sensitivity, 0.89; specificity, 0.93) and at 1.23 · 10 mm/s for the reference EPI (sensitivity, 1; specificity, 0.87)., Conclusions: Our data indicate that SMS acceleration can be used for diffusion imaging in breast MRI in clinical practice. Simultaneous multislice EPI achieved the same diagnostic accuracy in breast MRI, but in a substantially reduced scan time.

Rationale and Objectives: To compare the image quality of electron beam tomography (EBT) and multislice spiral CT (MSCT) for coronary artery visualization., Materials and Methods: Two groups of 30 patients without coronary stenoses were studied by MSCT (4 x 1 mm collimation) or EBT (3 mm slice thickness). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), overall length of the visualized arteries and vessel length free of motion artifacts were measured., Results: Length of visualized arteries was equal in MSCT and EBT. In EBT, longer segments were depicted free of motion artifacts (MSCT: 73%, EBT: 92% of visualized length, P< 0.001) and CNR was significantly higher than in MSCT (15.4 vs. 9.0; P< 0.001). In both modalities, vessel diameters correlated closely to quantitative coronary angiography., Conclusions: EBT and MSCT permit reliable coronary artery visualization and measurement of vessel diameters. For the used scan protocol, MSCT images had a lower CNR and were more frequently affected by motion.

Background: Multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) with retrospectively ECG-gated image reconstruction permits coronary artery visualization. We investigated the method's ability to identify high-grade coronary artery stenoses and occlusions., Methods and Results: A total of 64 consecutive patients were studied by MSCT (4x1 mm cross-sections, 500-ms rotation, table feed 1.5 mm/rotation, intravenous contrast agent, retrospectively ECG-gated image reconstruction). All coronary arteries and side branches with a luminal diameter >/=2.0 mm were assessed concerning evaluability and the presence of high-grade stenoses (>70% diameter stenosis) or occlusions. Results were compared with quantitative coronary angiography. Of 256 coronary arteries (left main, left anterior descending, left circumflex and right coronary artery, including their respective side branches), 174 could be evaluated (68%). In 19 patients (30%), all arteries were evaluable. Artifacts caused by coronary motion were the most frequent reason for unevaluable arteries. Overall, 32 of 58 high-grade stenoses and occlusions were detected by MSCT (58%). In evaluable arteries, 32 of 35 lesions were detected, and the absence of stenosis was correctly identified in 117 of 139 arteries (sensitivity, 91%; specificity, 84%). If analysis was extended to all stenoses with >50% diameter reduction, sensitivity was 85% (40 of 47) and specificity was 76% (96 of 127)., Conclusions: MSCT with retrospective ECG gating permits the detection of coronary artery stenoses with high accuracy if image quality is sufficient, but its clinical use may presently be limited due to degraded image quality in a substantial number of cases, mainly due to rapid coronary motion.