Search

Study Design: Experimental and computational study of posterior spinal instrumentation and growing rod constructs per ASTM F1717-15 vertebrectomy methodology for static compressive bending., Objective: Assess mechanical performance of standard fusion instrumentation and growing rod constructs., Summary of Background Data: Growing rod instrumentation utilizes fewer anchors and spans longer distances, increasing shared implant loads relative to fusion. There is a need to evaluate growing rod's mechanical performance. ASTM F1717-15 standard assesses performance of spinal instrumentation; however, effects of growing rods with side-by-side connectors have not been evaluated., Methods: Standard and growing rod constructs were tested per ASTM F1717-15 methodology; setup was modified for growing rod constructs to allow for connector offset. Three experimental groups (standard with active length 76 mm, and growing rods with active lengths 76 and 376 mm; n = 5/group) were tested; stiffness, yield load, and load at maximum displacement were calculated. Computational models were developed and used to locate stress concentrations., Results: For both constructs at 76 mm active length, growing rod stiffness (49 ± 0.8 N/mm) was significantly greater than standard (43 ± 0.4 N/mm); both were greater than growing rods at 376 mm (10 ± 0.3 N/mm). No significant difference in yield load was observed between growing rods (522 ± 12 N) and standard (457 ± 19 N) constructs of 76 mm. Growing rod constructs significantly decreased from 76 mm (522 ± 12 N) to 376 mm active length (200 ± 2 N). Maximum load of growing rods at 76 mm (1084 ± 11 N) was significantly greater than standard at 76 mm (1007 ± 7 N) and growing rods at 376 mm active length (392 ± 5 N). Simulations with active length of 76 mm were within 10% of experimental mechanical characteristics; stress concentrations were at the apex and cranial to connector-rod interaction for standard and growing rod models, respectively., Conclusion: Growing rod constructs are stronger and stiffer than spinal instrumentation constructs; with an increased length accompanied a decrease in strength. Growing rod construct stress concentration locations observed during computational simulation are consistent with clinically observed failure locations., Level of Evidence: 5.

Study Design: Experimental correlation study design to quantify features of disc health, including signal intensity and distinction between the annulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus, with T2* magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and correlate with the functional mechanics in corresponding motion segments., Objective: Establish the relationship between disc health assessed by quantitative T2* MRI and functional lumbar mechanics., Summary of Background Data: Degeneration leads to altered biochemistry in the disc, affecting the mechanical competence. Clinical routine MRI sequences are not adequate in detecting early changes in degeneration and fails to correlate with pain or improve patient stratification. Quantitative T2* relaxation time mapping probes biochemical features and may offer more sensitivity in assessing disc degeneration., Methods: Cadaveric lumbar spines were imaged using quantitative T2* mapping, as well as conventional T2-weighted MRI sequences. Discs were graded by the Pfirrmann scale, and features of disc health, including signal intensity (T2* intensity area) and distinction between the annulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus (transition zone slope), were quantified by T2*. Each motion segment was subjected to pure moment bending to determine range of motion (ROM), neutral zone (NZ), and bending stiffness., Results: T2* intensity area and transition zone slope were significantly correlated with flexion ROM (P = 0.015; P = 0.002), ratio of NZ/ROM (P = 0.010; P = 0.028), and stiffness (P = 0.044; P = 0.026), as well as lateral bending NZ/ROM (P = 0.005; P = 0.010) and stiffness (P = 0.022; P = 0.029). T2* intensity area was also correlated with lateral bending ROM (P = 0.023). Pfirrmann grade was only correlated with lateral bending NZ/ROM (P = 0.001) and stiffness (P = 0.007)., Conclusion: T2* mapping is a sensitive quantitative method capable of detecting changes associated with disc degeneration. Features of disc health quantified with T2* predicted altered functional mechanics of the lumbar spine better than traditional Pfirrmann grading. This new methodology and analysis technique may enhance the assessment of degeneration and enable greater patient stratification for therapeutic strategies., Level of Evidence: N/A.