Search

We performed a pilot study in anticipation of using long-aged precut formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections stored in real-world conditions for translational biomarker studies of topoisomerase 2A (TOP2A), Ki67, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in endometrial cancer. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks or unstained slides or both from GOG-0177 were collected centrally (1999-2000) and stored at room temperature. During 2004 to 2011 specimens were stored at 4°C. Matched pairs of stored slides and freshly cut slides from stored blocks were analyzed for TOP2A (KiS1), Ki67 (MIB1), and HER2 (HercepTest) proteins. To assess DNA stability (HER2 PathVision), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was repeated on stored slides from 21 cases previously shown to be HER2 amplified. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining intensity and extent, mean FISH copies/cell, and copy number ratios were compared using the κ statistic for concordance or signed rank test for differences in old cut versus new cut slides. IHC results reflected some protein degradation in stored slides. The proportion of cells with TOP2A staining was lower on average by 12% in older sections (P=0.03). The proportion of Ki67-positive cells was lower in stored slides by an average of 10% (P<0.01). Too few cases in the IHC cohort were FISH positive for any conclusions. HER2 amplification by FISH was unaffected by slide storage. We conclude that use of aged stored slides for proliferation markers TOP2A and Ki67 is feasible but may modestly underestimate true values in endometrial cancer. Pilot studies for particular storage conditions/durations/antigens to be used in translational studies are warranted., Competing Interests: V.L.F.: grants from NIH during the conduct of this study and additional funding from GOG Foundation Inc. outside the submitted work for other gynecologic clinical trials. S.M.S.: speakers Burea for GSK (Zejula), AstraZeneca (Olaparib), and Merk (Keytruda+lenvatanib). T.A.G.: current employee of Abbott. M.W.M.: current employee of Lilly and own Lilly stock. G.F.F.: Ad board for GSK, institutional PI for industry trials of Roche, Syros, GSK, Iovance, Sanofi, Sermonix, Incyte, Compugen, Abbvie, Eisai, Celldex, Astra Zeneca, Corcept, Merck, Plexxicon. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The medical and surgical treatment strategies for women with epithelial ovarian cancer continue to evolve. In the past several years, there has been significant progress backed by landmark clinical trials. Although primary epithelial ovarian cancer is still treated with a combination of surgery and systemic therapy, more complex surgical procedures and novel therapeutics have emerged as standard of care. Cytotoxic chemotherapy and maximal surgical effort remain mainstays, but targeted therapies are becoming more widespread and new data have called into question the role of surgery for women with recurrent disease. Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors have improved progression-free survival outcomes in both the frontline and recurrent settings, and their use has become increasingly widespread. The recent creation of treatment categories based on genetic changes reinforces the recommendation that all women with epithelial ovarian cancer have germline genetic testing, and new biomarker-driven drug approvals indicate that women may benefit from somatic molecular testing as well. To continue to identify novel strategies, however, enrollment on clinical trials remains of the utmost importance. With the evolving data on surgical approaches, targeted therapies such as antiangiogenics and poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors, and the new therapeutic agents and combinations in development, we hope that advanced epithelial ovarian cancer will eventually transition from an almost universally fatal disease to one that can increasingly be cured., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background Postoperative transcatheter interventions (TCIs) are performed after congenital heart surgery to treat residual or recurrent anatomic lesions. We used the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database to evaluate rates of postoperative TCIs, center variability, and to determine whether center approaches to postoperative TCI might be associated with outcomes. Methods and Results Patients <18 years undergoing an index operation (2010-2016) were included. We determined predischarge postoperative TCI rates and used multivariable modeling, adjusting for patient factors and case complexity, to evaluate the association between center risk-adjusted postoperative TCI rates and risk-adjusted outcomes (operative mortality, post-TCI mortality, and failure-to-rescue). Postoperative TCI was performed after 2615/105 742 (2.5%) index operations and after 1443/25 416 (5.7%) highest complexity operations (STAT [Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Mortality Score] Mortality Category 4 and 5). Median (interquartile range) age of patients undergoing TCI was 2.7 (0.2-8.0) months with 43% performed in neonates. There was a wide center variability across the 107 included centers with risk-adjusted rates of postoperative TCI ranging from 0.0% to 8.0% overall and 0.0% to 20.7% for STAT 4 and 5 cases. Postoperative TCI was associated with higher risk-adjusted odds of operative mortality (odds ratio, 4.06; 95% CI, 3.60-4.58). Centers with higher postoperative TCI rates had higher overall operative mortality ( R 2 =0.23; P=0.02) but did not have higher post-TCI mortality ( P=0.10). There was no correlation between center TCI rates and failure-to-rescue ( P=0.19). Conclusions Patients undergoing postoperative TCI represent a high-risk cohort. Wide center variability suggests the potential for improving outcomes, but further study is necessary to better understand optimal approaches.

Objectives: Whereas paclitaxel treatment is associated with leukopenia, the mechanisms that underlie this effect are not well-characterized. In addition, despite the importance of glucocorticoid signaling in cancer treatment, the genomic effects of glucocorticoid receptor antagonism by mifepristone treatment in primary human cells have never been described., Methods: As part of a randomized phase 1 clinical trial, we used microarrays to profile gene expression in peripheral blood cells sampled from each of four patients at baseline, after placebo/nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) treatment (cycle 1), and after mifepristone/nab-paclitaxel treatment (cycle 2)., Results: We found that 63 genes were differentially expressed following treatment with nab-paclitaxel, including multiple genes in the tubulin pathway. We also found 606 genes that were differentially expressed in response to mifepristone; genes downregulated by mifepristone overlapped significantly with those previously identified as being upregulated by dexamethasone., Conclusion: These results provide insights into the mechanisms of paclitaxel and glucocorticoid receptor inhibition in peripheral blood cells.

Objective: ABT-751, a novel orally available antitubulin agent, is mainly eliminated as inactive glucuronide (ABT-751G) and sulfate (ABT-751S) conjugates. We performed a pharmacogenetic investigation of ABT-751 pharmacokinetics using in-vitro data to guide the selection of genes for genotyping in a phase I trial of ABT-751., Methods: UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) and sulfotransferase (SULT) enzymes were screened for ABT-751 metabolite formation in vitro. Forty-seven cancer patients treated with ABT-751 were genotyped for 21 variants in these genes., Results: UGT1A1, UGT1A4, UGT1A8, UGT2B7, and SULT1A1 were found to be involved in the formation of inactive ABT-751 glucuronide (ABT-751G) and sulfate (ABT-751S). SULT1A1 copy number (>2) was associated with an average 34% increase in ABT-751 clearance (P=0.044), an 18% reduction in ABT-751 AUC (P=0.045), and a 50% increase in sulfation metabolic ratios (P=0.025). UGT1A8 rs6431558 was associated with a 28% increase in glucuronidation metabolic ratios (P=0.022), and UGT1A4*2 was associated with a 65% decrease in ABT-751 C trough (P=0.009)., Conclusion: These results might represent the first example of a clinical pharmacokinetic effect of the SULT1A1 copy number variant on the clearance of a SULT1A1 substrate. A-priori selection of candidate genes guided by in-vitro metabolic screening enhanced our ability to identify genetic determinants of interpatient pharmacokinetic variability.

The incidence of breast cancer increases with age. This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral UFT (ftorafur plus uracil) plus leucovorin in elderly patients with advanced breast cancer. Eligibility criteria included age > or =65 years, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, < or =1 prior chemotherapy regimens in the setting of metastatic disease, performance status 0-2, and adequate end-organ function. UFT at 300 mg/m2 per day as 2 divided doses and 30 mg leucovorin with each dose were administered orally daily for 21 days, followed by a 7-day rest period. Ten patients were accrued. Six patients received treatment in their first relapse and 3 in their second. One patient was chemotherapy-naive. The dose-limiting toxicity was diarrhea with grade 3 or 4 diarrhea occurring more often in the oldest patients (1 of 6 patients between 65 and 69 vs. 3 of 4 patients > or =70 years old). Protocol treatment was discontinued in 2 patients (ages 78 and 83) secondary to severe gastrointestinal toxicity. One patient achieved a partial response. Although UFT/leucovorin had efficacy in 1 patient, toxicity in the patients over 70 years of age was increased. Careful evaluation of anticancer drug toxicity in very elderly patients is important as our population ages.

Both ifosfamide and vinorelbine have been shown to produce responses in women with previously treated ovarian cancer. However, vinorelbine has been reported to cause severe neuropathy in patients previously treated with paclitaxel. We assessed a regimen consisting of ifosfamide 1.6 g/m2/d and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2/d for 3 days consecutively every 21 days. Because these doses resulted in severe neutropenia despite the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, doses were reduced to a final level of ifosfamide 960 mg/m2/d and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2/d. Peripheral sensory neuropathy was evaluated by questionnaire. A total of 30 women were treated. All had previously been treated with both a platinum compound and paclitaxel. One partial response was observed among 23 patients with measurable disease, and two CA-125 responses were noted among seven patients without measurable disease. Severe progressive neurotoxicity was not observed. Despite the fact that almost half the patients had not been exposed to cyclophosphamide, this regimen produced few responses. Superior response rates have been reported with single-agent vinorelbine at doses that do not require growth factor support. With this dose and schedule, vinorelbine is reasonably safe therapy for patients who have received prior paclitaxel and who have have mild baseline sensory neuropathy.

A phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated doses of intravenous etoposide and paclitaxel for women with previously treated persistent or recurrent ovarian cancer. Starting doses were paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 during 24 hours and etoposide 50 mg/m2/day for 3 consecutive days. The study was designed to escalate first the dose of etoposide, and then the dose of paclitaxel, in successive cohorts of patients. In an attempt to determine whether toxicity was affected by sequence of the drugs, the order of administration of the two drugs was reversed on alternate cycles. The starting doses of paclitaxel (135 mg/m2/24 hours) and etoposide (50 mg/m2/day x 3) caused severe neutropenia even with the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and the trial was amended to administer the paclitaxel during 3 hours. However, this also proved too myelosuppressive without growth factor support. Twenty-one women were treated. A complete response was observed in one of nine patients with measurable disease, and a major decrease in CA-125 was noted in two patients who did not have measurable disease. Because of the severe myelosuppression observed in most patients, dose reduction was often required after the first cycle. The power to detect sequence-dependent variation in toxicity was minimal; however, no large differences were observed. A combination of the usual doses of these drugs will be difficult to administer in patients who have received previous chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.

New therapies are needed for patients with advanced ovarian cancer who relapse after initial treatment with platinum and/or paclitaxel-based regimens. This study sought to determine the toxicities of combined liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) and topotecan, and to determine a regimen for future phase II testing in ovarian cancer. Nine patients with advanced malignancies were treated with topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/day X 5 days followed by liposomal doxorubicin at a starting dose of 30 mg/m2 on day 5. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. A total of 13 cycles of therapy were administered. Grade IV neutropenia and grade IV thrombocytopenia developed in both of the two patients treated at the first dose level. Subsequent patients received only 20 mg/m2 liposomal doxorubicin. At that dose level, three patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (one grade IV neutropenia, two grade IV neutropenia and thrombocytopenia). No responses were observed. These data indicate that the described regimen of liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan is not feasible because of excessive hematologic toxicity. Escalation to doses of liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan that have previously demonstrated antitumor activity was not possible. Future strategies to minimize such toxicity may include limiting eligibility to patients with minimal prior therapy, reducing the number of days of topotecan administration, or use of oral topotecan.