Search

Objectives: In middle-aged adults, vascular damage correlates better with ambulatory than with clinic blood pressure. This study aimed to determine whether vascular damage evaluated by carotid ultrasonography in the elderly is also more closely related to ambulatory than to clinic blood pressure, and which blood pressure variables are better associated with vascular damage., Methods: Cross-sectional study of 292 randomly selected >65 years old participants who underwent 24-h noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Blood pressure variables analyzed were (a) clinic blood pressure: systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure; (b) ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: mean values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, systolic and diastolic blood pressure load, pulse pressure, as well as variability, evaluated within 24 h, diurnal and nocturnal periods; and day-night blood pressure difference. A clinical history, physical examination, carotid ultrasonography and laboratory tests were performed. To estimate the relationship between blood pressure and vascular damage, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed., Results: Mean age: 73+/-6 years, 45% men, 76.7% hypertensive patients. In the simple regression analysis, the best significant correlations (P<0.05) were common carotid intima-media thickness with 24-h and nocturnal pulse pressure (r=0.32), and common carotid diameter with 24-h systolic blood pressure load (r=0.47). In the multivariate analysis, the significant associations (P<0.05) were (a) linear regression: nocturnal pulse pressure with common carotid intima-media thickness, and diurnal pulse pressure as well as 24-h systolic blood pressure load with common carotid diameter; (b) logistic regression, adjusted odds ratio: nocturnal pulse pressure and nocturnal diastolic blood pressure load with the presence of carotid atherosclerotic plaques 1.03 and 0.98, respectively., Conclusions: In the elderly, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is better associated with carotid damage than clinic blood pressure. Systolic blood pressure variables are the best associated, blood pressure load and pulse pressure being better associated with carotid damage than the mean levels of ambulatory blood pressure.

Purpose of Review: This review focuses on the pathophysiology and treatment of an increasingly common entity, cardio-renal insufficiency. Cardio-renal insufficiency is more than a simultaneous cardiac and renal disease. Patients with this condition live within a fragile equilibrium challenged by the interaction of profibrogenic, atherosclerotic, neurohumoral, and other less known factors. Regarding therapy, the avoidance of oscillations between overfilled-decompensated and emptied-overtreated states becomes of critical importance. Particular focus should be paid to personalized treatment, adjusted according to heart and kidney reserve, the predictable complications of therapy, prevention of decompensations, simple measures-based follow-up and alternative procedures., Recent Findings: Recent studies have established the important repercussions of unbalanced renal function on cardiovascular prognosis. In the heart failure setting, trials involving extensive cohorts of ageing or comorbidity-affected patients are presently under way. Special attention should be paid to recognize the presence of renal failure coexisting with heart failure, especially in patients with deceivingly near-normal plasma creatinine. Formulae to predict creatinine clearance are being increasingly incorporated into daily clinical practice. Disturbed renal function is an underappreciated prognostic factor in heart failure, and renal failure is frequently viewed as a relative contraindication to some proven efficacious therapies., Summary: Cardio-renal insufficiency is an emerging entity, with affected individuals surviving with extreme degrees of simultaneous heart failure and renal failure. Management of the condition is an intellectually demanding process. Crucial to this management is extensive medical expertise and an in-depth understanding of the particular renal, haemodynamic and internal milieu equilibrium of the patients.

Background: Tenofovir (TDF) and didanosine (ddI) are both adenosine analogues with convenient posology, strong potency and a relatively high genetic barrier for resistance. The popularity of this combination, however, has been questioned due to concerns about pharmacokinetic interactions and increased risk of pancreatitis and hyperglycemia. Less information is available about other possible side effects., Patients and Methods: HIV-infected individuals who initiated a protease inhibitor-sparing regimen between September 2002 and June 2003 at five hospitals, and had at least one subsequent visit within the next 12 months, always with complete virus suppression, were retrospectively assessed. Only drug-naive individuals and patients who simplified a prior successful antiretroviral regimen were analysed., Results: Outcomes were analysed in 570 individuals according to treatment modality (98 drug-naive versus 472 simplified); the nucleoside analogue (NA) backbone (298 with TDF + ddI, 88 with ddI, 44 with TDF, and 140 with neither ddI nor TDF); and the third agent used (378 with non-nucleoside analogues versus 192 with NA). Significant CD4+ T-cell declines were seen in patients taking ddI + TDF with respect to all other NA combinations, including ddI or TDF separately. Patients exposed to high ddI doses or taking a third NA showed more pronounced CD4 declines. Plasma levels of ddI correlated with the extent of CD4+ T-cell loss., Conclusion: Patients receiving ddI + TDF-based combinations show CD4+ T-cell declines despite achieving complete virus suppression. This effect generally progresses with time. An imbalance in adenosine metabolites within CD4+ T lymphocytes may explain this phenomenon, which resembles the genetic purine nucleoside phosphorylase deficiency syndrome.