Search

Objective: Childhood mortality remains unacceptably high. In low-resource settings, children with critical illness often present for care. Current triage strategies are time consuming and require trained health care workers. To address this limitation, our team developed a simple subjective tool, SCREEN (Sick Children Require Emergency Evaluation Now), which is easy to administer, to identify critically ill children. This article presents the development of the SCREEN program and evaluates its performance when compared with other commonly implemented triage tools in low-resource settings., Methods: We measured the sensitivity and specificity of SCREEN, to identify critically ill children, compared with 4 other previously validated triage tools: the Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses, the Pediatric Early Warning, the Pediatric South African Triage Scale, and the World Health Organization Emergency Triage Treatment Tool., Findings: SCREEN has high sensitivity (100%-98.73%; P < 0.001) and specificity (64.41%-50.71%; P < 0.001) when compared with other validated triage tools., Conclusions: The SCREEN tool may offer a simple and effective method to identify critically ill children in low-resource environments.

Objective: Despite the universal acknowledgment that triage is necessary to prioritize emergency care, there is no review that provides an overview of triage tools evaluated and utilized in resource-poor settings, such as low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We seek to quantify and evaluate studies evaluating triage tools in LMICs., Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature between 2000 and 2015 to identify studies that evaluated the reliability and validity of triage tools for adult emergency care in LMICs. Studies were then evaluated for the overall quality of evidence using the GRADE criteria., Results: Eighteen studies were included in the review, evaluating six triage tools. Three of the 18 studies were in low-income countries and none were in rural hospitals. Two of the six tools had evaluations of reliability. Each tool positively predicted clinical outcomes, although the variety in resource environments limited ability to compare the predictive nature of any one tool. The South African Triage Scale had the highest quality of evidence. In comparison with high-income countries, the review showed fewer studies evaluating reliability and presented a higher number of studies with small sample sizes that decreased the overall quality of evidence., Conclusion: The quality of evidence supporting any single triage tool's validity and reliability in LMICs is moderate at best. Research on triage tool applicability in low-resource environments must be targeted to the actual clinical environment where the tool will be utilized, and must include low-income countries and rural, primary care settings.

Aim: The pattern of limb fractures in children aged 24 months or younger is poorly understood. This age group is particularly vulnerable to nonaccidental injury, which can be difficult for inexperienced clinicians to detect. The aim of this study is to identify fracture patterns in children below the age of 24 months., Methods: Data was collected prospectively. For all fractures, the mechanism of injury including height of fall (cm), severity of injury, outcome and deprivation scores were collected. Information on children referred for child-protection review was also noted., Results: During the 12 months of the year 2003, 122 new patients aged less than 24 months presented with limb fractures directly to the Emergency Department of the Royal Hospital for Sick Children, giving an incidence of 4.55 per 1000 in the 0-12-month group and 17 per 1000 in the 13-24-month group. Sixty-three (52%) children sustained the injury during a fall and only 7% of children were admitted, the rest being followed up as outpatients. Thirty-eight (31%) had simple distal radius/ulna fractures. Five children with unclear histories or mechanisms of injury underwent formal child-protection procedures. All were less than 14 months of age., Conclusions: Fractures are relatively rare in the first 2 years of life. Child protection needs to be considered in all children, but specifically in those patients with atypical fractures presenting with an unclear mechanism of injury.

Aims: It can be difficult to determine the exact mechanism of injury in infants and babies aged 24 months and under. Falls are the most common mechanism of injury in children. The purpose of this study is to identify the relationship between reported height of fall and long bone fracture., Methods: All children aged under 24 months who sustained a fracture (in the year 2003) were identified prospectively on the departmental fracture database. These children were matched for age and sex with children identified as having fallen but not having sustained a fracture., Results: Sixty-three children aged 24 months and under were studied. The median height of fall in this group was 48 cm and that in the control group was 20 cm, P<0.001. A significant correlation was observed between the height of fall (cm) and severity of injury (Pearson's correlation coefficient=0.255). Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicates that the likelihood of significant fracture requiring admission and/or manipulation under anaesthesia occurs with a fall from a height of 56 cm [sensitivity 80% (confidence interval 29-97%), specificity 79% (confidence interval 70-86%)]. It was not possible to identify a height at which the risk of any fracture injury became significantly more likely., Conclusion: Height of fall is only one factor that must be considered in dealing with fracture injury in children aged 24 months or under. However, significant injury presenting with falls from less than 50 cm should be critically evaluated.