Search

Introduction: The upper body Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) is a 30-s maximal effort sprint against a set load (percentage of body mass). However, there is no consensus on the optimal load and no differential values for males and females, even when there are well-studied anatomical and physiological differences in muscle mass for the upper body. Our goal was to describe the effects of load, sex, and crank position on the kinetics, kinematics, and performance of the upper body WAnT., Methods: Eighteen participants (9 females) performed three WAnTs at 3%, 4%, and 5% of body mass. Arm crank forces, 2D kinematics, and performance variables were recorded during each WAnT., Results: Our results showed an increase of ~49% effective force, ~36% peak power, ~5° neck flexion, and ~30° shoulder flexion from 3% to 5% load ( P < 0.05). Mean power and anaerobic capacity decreased by 15%, with no changes in fatigue index ( P < 0.05). The positions of higher force efficiency were at 12 and 6 o'clock. The least force efficiency occurred at 3 o'clock ( P < 0.05). Sex differences showed that males produced 97% more effective force and 109% greater mean power than females, with 11.7% more force efficiency ( P < 0.001). Males had 16° more head/neck flexion than females, and females had greater elbow joint variability with 17° more wrist extension at higher loads. Males cycled ~32% faster at 3% versus 5% WAnT load with a 65% higher angular velocity than females. Grip strength, maximal voluntary isometric contraction, mass, and height positively correlated with peak and mean power ( P < 0.001)., Conclusions: In conclusion, load, sex, and crank position have a significant impact on performance of the WAnT. These factors should be considered when developing and implementing an upper body WAnT., (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Sports Medicine.)

Objective: The purpose of this study was to quantify the differences in upper limb muscle activity and kinematics when performing shoulder elastic resistance exercises with no cue, slouched posture, and corrected posture., Design: Fifteen healthy participants completed four shoulder elastic resistance exercises (unilateral flexion, bilateral flexion, external rotation, and external rotation with towel) across three simulated body postures (no cue, corrected posture, and slouched posture). Surface electromyography was measured on 16 upper limb muscles and kinematics were collected. Two-way repeated-measures analyses of variance examined differences in muscle activation and kinematics across postures and exercises., Results: Interactions between exercise and posture were found for most muscles. Muscle activity interactions existed in 14 of the 16 muscles examined, with 8 muscles having the greatest activity in the unilateral flexion, slouched condition (P < 0.0001). The slouched posture generated activity up to 88.4 ± 5.1 %MVC in the cervical extensors. Completing flexion or external rotation exercises with a slouched posture led to increased glenohumeral range of motion (P < 0.0001), but these differences were less than 5 degrees between the greatest and smallest ranges of motion (85.8 vs. 81.0 degrees)., Conclusion: Posture influenced muscle activation and kinematics, with slouched postures increasing muscle activity and range of motion. There was little to no difference between the no cue and corrected cue conditions, suggesting that perhaps a clinician's time may be better spent focusing on avoiding slouched postures rather than ensuring mastering technique., Competing Interests: Financial disclosure statements have been obtained, and no conflicts of interest have been reported by the authors or by any individuals in control of the content of this article., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)