Search

There are many types of cysts in the leg; the most common is a popliteal (Baker's) cyst. This occurs when synovial fluid fills the tissue plane between the medial head of the gastrocnemius and the semimembranosus muscle and is often associated with intraarticular knee pathology. Treatment for various types of cysts includes aspiration with or without fenestration, injections with corticosteroids, dextrose, or various sclerosing agents, and surgical excision. This case describes a 58-yr-old man with a large cyst measuring 14.7 x 2.7 x 3.1 cm in size in the lateral calf, within the lateral gastrocnemius, with atypical size and location for a calf cyst. Computed tomography arthrogram showed intraarticular communication with the knee. The cyst recurred after two aspirations and injections with 25% dextrose/lidocaine. Aspiration and injection with doxycycline resulted in temporary relief followed by recurrence. Complete cyst resolution occurred after final aspiration without injectate. The cyst was likely synovial based on location, intraarticular communication, and fluid analysis. We suspect that complete resolution may have been due to repeated aspiration and injection, essentially performing longitudinal cyst fenestration, with possible contribution from doxycycline injection. Further study of intracyst doxycycline injection with reaspiration after 10 mins for treatment of refractory cysts may be warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Pes anserine bursitis is the most common cause of periarticular knee pain. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of local injection-based therapies with different materials. Design: The enrolled patientswere randomly allocated to three groups to receive different interventions. Outcomemeasures included pain severity using the visual analog scale and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index that was evaluated before the intervention, 1 and 8 wks after that. Results: This trial was performed on 72 participants, with male-tofemale ratio of 0.14 and with a mean age of 61.49 ± 9.35 yrs. Corticosteroids in the first group, oxygen-ozone in the second group, and dextrose 20% in the third group, were injected into the pes anserine bursa under ultrasound guidance. Interaction between time and group showed a statistically significant improvement in visual analog scale and Western Ontario andMcMaster Universities Arthritis Index (P = 0.05) in favor of corticosteroids and oxygen-ozone groups after 1 wk and in favor of oxygen-ozone and prolotherapy groups after 8 wks. Conclusions: All three treatment options are effective for patients with pes anserine bursitis. This study showed that the effects of oxygen-ozone injection and prolotherapy last longer than those of corticosteroid injection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sports medicine providers often perform various outpatient procedures to manage musculoskeletal and neuropathic conditions. Vasovagal syncope is a rare but a possible complication. Convulsive syncope is one subtype that involves brief extensor stiffening and nonsustained myoclonus and can be easily mistaken for seizures. We present a case series of convulsive syncope as a complication of common sports medicine outpatient procedures. We aim to describe how to identify this condition, and offer risk stratification and management strategies to mitigate the risks of this complication. Sports medicine providers who routinely practice outpatient procedures should be aware of this complication. Simple changes in approaching the procedure may mitigate these risks. High- and intermediate-risk features of the syncopal episode should prompt physicians to seek further evaluation by a specialist to rule out more serious conditions. In all instances, appropriate on-site support and equipment for emergent resuscitation and management should be prepared. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article presents a case study focusing on priapism in a patient with sickle cell disease, with repeated emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations. The patient was successfully identified and treated by the ED nurse practitioner (NP) with aspiration of the corpus cavernosum. Priapism is a persistent penile erection that continues for an extended time. There is some argument about what that length of time is, but generally, the consensus is more than 4 hr beyond sexual stimulation or unrelated to sexual stimulation or sexual interest (Bivalacqua et al., 2022). Priapism is a fairly common but underrecognized complication of sickle cell disease. It represents a urological emergency in which timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment are vital to preserving penile tissue and sexual function. The diagnosis is made clinically with a comprehensive history, physical examination, and appropriate laboratory test values. Initial management can be conservative with hydration and analgesics or, if necessary, more invasive with needle aspiration to promote detumescence. Permanent tissue damage or erectile dysfunction can result if priapism is unrecognized, untreated, or not treated immediately. The NP plays an integral role in treating and preventing permanent damage. Patient education should focus on instructions for preventing priapism and managing episodes at home. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Priapism is a disorder where the penis without sexual stimulation maintains a prolonged rigid erection lasting 4 or more hours. There are two classifications of priapism, ischemic (low flow) or nonischemic high flow, and each have specific etiologies, diagnostic criteria, and management. This presented case study involved a 58-year-old male who experienced an ischemic priapism more than 24 hours after an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). A flaccid penis was achieved after the patient received two 400 µg of phenylephrine HCL into the corpora cavernosum. Review of the literature suggests anesthetic medications given during the surgical procedure may have caused the priapism. Lessons that can be learned from this case study highlight that even though the nurse may not expect to see a priapism after an ALIF, the nurse must always be diligent and not become complacent with unexpected findings or assessments that may cause irreparable harm to the patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Examining the association of time to treatment (drug or placebo) with survival to hospital discharge and neurologic outcome. Design: Post hoc analysis of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Amiodarone, Lidocaine, Placebo randomized controlled trial. Setting: Emergency medical services enrolled patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) at multiple North American sites. Patients: Adults with nontraumatic OHCA and an initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia refractory to at least one defibrillation attempt were included. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: We used logistic regression to examine the association of time to treatment with survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurologic status at discharge (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 3) for the three treatment groups including an interaction term between treatment and time to treatment to determine the effect of time on treatment effects. Time to treatment data were available for 2,994 out of 3,026 patients (99%). The proportion of patients who survived to hospital discharge decreased as time to drug administration increased, in amiodarone (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90–0.93 per min), lidocaine (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.91–0.96), and placebo (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90–0.93). Comparing amiodarone to placebo, there was improved survival at all times of drug administration (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.05–1.65). Comparing lidocaine to placebo, survival was not different with shorter times to drug administration (< 11 min), whereas survival was higher with lidocaine at longer times to drug administration with an interaction between treatment effect and time to treatment (p = 0.048). Survival with good neurologic outcome showed similar results for all analyses. Conclusions: Survival and favorable neurologic outcomes decreased with longer times to drug administration. Amiodarone improved survival at all time points whereas lidocaine improved survival only at later time points, compared with placebo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The epidural space is commonly accessed via an interlaminar or transforaminal approach to administer corticosteroids for radicular pain. An alternative is a transarticular approach, which may be considered when conventional access to the epidural space is either not desired or contraindicated. This approach has been described in the cervical spine using computed tomography guidance but not fluoroscopic guidance. We describe a cervical transarticular approach to the epidural space under fluoroscopy and review the computed tomography–guided literature. The risks of transarticular epidural injections are likely low given that when performed prudently, they avoid direct contact with the vertebral artery, spinal medullary arteries, venous plexus, spinal cord, and nerve roots. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abortion is a common medical procedure in the United States that is frequently the target of political and legal restrictions. These restrictions can negatively impact care and interfere with the patient-provider relationship. In this paper, we aim to review the historic context in which feticidal agents became more utilized in later abortion; describe current practices and protocols of using feticidal agents use for later abortion by dilation and evacuation and induction of labor; evaluate patient and provider perspectives on feticidal agent use; and propose areas of further ethical and research inquiry to characterize the use of these agents in later abortion procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses differential diagnosis for posterior gluteal/hip pain is broad because of the overlap of structures and possible proximal sources with radiation to the area. Topics include bilateral lower limbs. She had pain with hip adduction, external rotation, and was tender to palpation over the ischiofemoral space.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate the association between immediate pain relief from injections of local anesthetic with corticosteroid and subsequent pain relief up to 3 mos. The secondary aim was to examine the time until subjective pain relief after these injections. Design: This was a single-center, prospective study of patients undergoing ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections for musculoskeletal pain. Subjects completed follow-up surveys at 2 wks, 1 mo, and 3 mos postinjections. χ2 tests and sensitivity analysis were used to examine the primary outcome, at least 50% relief from the injection. Regression modeling examined the effects of demographic and injection-related variables on outcome measures. Results: A total of 132 patients were enrolled (55% female, mean age 52 yrs). Response rates were 87.1% at 2 wks and 77.2% at 3 mos. The positive likelihood ratios from 50% initial pain relief ranged from 1.22 to 1.29 at the three time points, whereas the negative likelihood ratios ranged from 0.54 to 0.63. More than 75% of participants reported subjective pain relief by day 4 after injection. Conclusions: The predictive value of immediate pain relief for subsequent longer-term pain relief from corticosteroid-anesthetic injections is not particularly high. Most patients will obtain pain relief within 4 days of a corticosteroid injection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Del Nido cardioplegia (DNC) has extensively been used for pediatric population undergoing cardiac surgery. However, its use in adult cardiac surgeries have been limited thus, its benefits are not yet fully known. This analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of DNC versus any other type of cardioplegia in adult patients who are undergoing cardiac surgery., Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from database inception till March 2023, and moderate to high-quality randomized controlled trials were included which compared DNC to other cardioplegia. The primary outcome was postoperative stroke and/or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Secondary outcomes included spontaneous rhythm return, postoperative myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, postoperative atrial fibrillation, defibrillation after coronary reperfusion, postoperative intra-aortic balloon pump, postoperative kidney injury, postoperative low cardiac output syndrome, inotropic support, cardiopulmonary bypass time, cross-clamp time, blood transfusion, cardioplegia volume, hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, mechanical ventilation stay, postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction, and cardiac markers., Results: In this meta-analysis, 13 studies were included with a patient population of 2207. Stroke and/or TIA studies (risk ratio [RR]: 0.54, 95% CI [0.29, 1.00]) and all-cause mortality studies (RR: 1.30, 95% CI [0.66, 2.56]) were insignificant. From the secondary outcomes, spontaneous rhythm return (RR: 1.58, 95% CI [1.02, 2.45]), defibrillation after coronary reperfusion (RR: 0.49, 95% CI [0.30, 0.79]), inotropic support (RR: 0.70, 95% CI [0.57, 0.85]), composite risk of stroke and/or TIA and/or acute kidney injury and mortality (RR: 0.72, 95% CI [0.53, 0.99]), cross-clamp time (mean difference [MD]: -6.01, 95% CI [-11.14, -0.89]), blood transfusion (RR: 0.73, 95% CI [0.60, 0.90]), cardioplegia volume (MD: -537.17, 95% CI [-758.89, -315.45]), troponin T (MD: -1.71, 95% CI [-2.11, -1.32]), creatine phosphokinase-MB (MD: -2.96, 95% CI [-5.84, -0.07]) were significant. Whereas all other secondary outcomes were found to be insignificant., Conclusion: No significant difference was observed between patients undergoing Del Nido administration in comparison to other cardioplegia solutions for the primary outcome, stroke or/and TIA., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Atraumatic distal clavicular osteolysis (DCO) is a cause of shoulder pain in younger athletes, often resulting from weightlifting and activities with repetitive pressing and overhead lifting. Athletes will present with shoulder pain localized to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint, with tenderness to palpation over the joint exacerbated by provocative testing on examination. Conservative management often includes activity modification, oral analgesics, physical therapy, and corticosteroid injection. Distal clavicular osteolysis can be refractory to conservative management and these athletes are often referred for surgical consultation. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections have been used to treat a wide variety of musculoskeletal injuries, but there have been no published studies assessing the efficacy of PRP injections specifically for distal clavicle osteolysis. We present a case of refractory DCO successfully treated with an ultrasound-guided PRP injection of the AC joint. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses two separate cases related to dermatologic procedures. The first case involves a patient who experienced anaphylaxis after receiving an injection of poly-L-lactic acid and lidocaine without epinephrine. The second case involves a patient who had injectable silicone filler placed in the nasolabial folds over 20 years ago and sought a less invasive option for removal. The article emphasizes the importance of recognizing and treating anaphylaxis promptly and highlights the challenges and limited options for removing injectable silicone filler. [Extracted from the article]

Objective: To compare pain scores during office dilation and aspiration between low-volume and high-volume paracervical block of the same dose.Methods: We conducted a multi-site, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial from October 2018 to December 2020. We randomized participants presenting for office dilation and aspiration under minimal sedation stratified by procedural indication (induced abortion vs early pregnancy loss) to a 20-mL buffered 1% lidocaine paracervical block or a 40-mL buffered 0.5% lidocaine paracervical block, both with two units of vasopressin in a standardized technique. To detect a 15-mm or greater difference in pain at the time of cervical dilation with 80% power and a two-sided alpha of 0.05, a total of 104 participants was required. The study was also powered to detect a 20-mm or greater difference in pain at the time of cervical dilation within each stratum (induced abortion and early pregnancy loss). The primary outcome was pain with cervical dilation on a 100-mm visual analog scale in the overall cohort. Secondary outcomes included pain with cervical dilation within each stratum. We used a Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare median pain scores between groups.Results: We enrolled 114 participants. There was no difference in median pain scores between low-volume and high-volume groups during dilation (62 mm vs 59 mm, P=.94), aspiration (69.5 mm vs 70 mm, P=.47), postprocedure (25 mm vs 25 mm, P=.76), or overall (60 mm vs 60 mm, P=.23). Stratified by indication, there were no significant differences in scores at any time point between the low-volume and high-volume paracervical block groups. There was decreased overall pain in patients with induced abortion who received the higher volume paracervical block, though this did not reach statistical significance (67.5 mm vs 60.5 mm, P=.08). Pain during paracervical block administration was similar between groups (55 mm vs 45 mm, P=.24) and there was no difference in occurrence of side effects (P=.63).Conclusion: We found no difference in pain with cervical dilation among participants who received the low-volume compared with high-volume paracervical block when studied alone.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03636451. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Introduction: Controlling perioperative pain is essential to improving patient experience and satisfaction following surgery. Traditionally opioids have been frequently utilized for postoperative analgesia. Although they are effective at controlling pain, they are associated with adverse effects, including postoperative nausea, vomiting, ileus, and long-term opioid dependency. Following laparoscopic colectomy, the use of intravenous or intraperitoneal infusions of lidocaine (IVL, IPL) are promising emerging analgesic options. Although both techniques are promising, there have been no direct, prospective randomized comparisons in patients undergoing laparoscopic colon resection. The purpose of this study was to compare IPL with IVL. Methods: Double-blinded, randomized controlled trial of patients undergoing laparoscopic colonic resection. The 2 groups received equal doses of either IPL or IVL which commenced intra-operatively with a bolus followed by a continuous infusion for 3 days postoperatively. Patients were cared for through a standardized enhanced recovery after surgery program. The primary outcome was total postoperative opioid consumption over the first 3 postoperative days. Patients were followed for 60 days. Results: Fifty-six patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to the IVL or IPL groups. Total opioid consumption over the first 3 postoperative days was significantly lower in the IPL group (70.9 mg vs 157.8 mg P < 0.05) and overall opioid consumption during the total length of stay was also significantly lower (80.3 mg vs 187.36 mg P < 0.05. Pain scores were significantly lower at 2 hours postoperatively in the IPL group, however, all other time points were not significant. There were no differences in complications between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Perioperative use of IPL results in a significant reduction in opioid consumption following laparoscopic colon surgery when compared to IVL. This suggests that the peritoneal cavity/compartment is a strategic target for local anesthetic administration. Future enhanced recovery after surgery recommendations should consider IPL as an important component of a multimodal pain strategy following colectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: There are limited published data regarding the incidence and risk factors for infection after minor dermatologic procedures, such as skin biopsy, shave, and curettage. Prior studies of infection risk after dermatologic procedures have often not specified the method of preparation of local anesthetic. OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence and risk factors for infection after minor procedures performed in a general dermatology clinic using buffered lidocaine prepared in office. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective case–control study, the medical record was searched for cases of infection after skin biopsies, shaves, conventional excisions, and destructions performed in a general dermatology clinic over a 4-year period. Patient and procedure characteristics were compared with uninfected controls. RESULTS: Of 9,031 procedures performed during the study period, there were 34 infections (0.4%). The odds of infection for procedures on the arm and leg were 5.29 and 9.28 times higher, respectively, than those on the head/neck. There was no significant effect of age, sex, smoking, immunosuppression, diabetes, or anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: The incidence of infection is low after minor dermatologic procedures performed with local anesthesia using buffered lidocaine prepared in office. There is a higher risk of infection on the arm and leg compared with the head and neck. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

I.V. catheter placement is one of the most common causes of procedural pain in children. Interventions to address this pain are readily available but inconsistently used in practice. The focus of this article is to identify and encourage best practice for pain mitigation in peripheral I.V. catheter placement in children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate whether a 12-mL paracervical block is noninferior to a 20-mL block in reducing pain with osmotic dilator insertion.Methods: In this single-blinded noninferiority trial, we randomized individuals undergoing insertion of osmotic dilators before second-trimester abortion to receive either a 12-mL or 20-mL 1% lidocaine paracervical block. The primary outcome was pain immediately after insertion of osmotic dilators. Prespecified secondary outcomes included pain with paracervical block administration, overall pain, and side effects, with 88 participants being required for a noninferiority margin of 15 mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale assuming an SD of 28. We analyzed data using Wilcoxon rank sum, χ2, and t tests and performed analysis of variance to account for repeated measures. Secondary analysis included multivariable regression to explore potential confounders.Results: From January 2018 to October 2020, of 232 eligible individuals, 174 were approached and 96 randomized (48 participants to each group); 91 were available for analysis (45: 12 mL, 46: 20 mL). Group demographics were similar, with a mean gestation of 21 weeks and four osmotic dilators placed. The 12-mL paracervical block was noninferior to the 20-mL paracervical block for pain with osmotic dilator insertion with a difference in means of -1.36 (95% CI -12.56 to 9.85) favoring 12 mL. Median pain scores after dilator placement were 47 mm (interquartile range 22-68) and 50 mm (interquartile range 27-67) in 12-mL compared with 20-mL paracervical block, respectively (P=.81). No difference was seen in median pain at baseline, with paracervical block administration, postprocedure or with overall pain or experience. At least one lidocaine-related side effect occurred in 4% of participants in the 12-mL group compared with 13% for those receiving 20 mL (P=.15), with metallic taste, ringing in ears, and lightheadedness being most common.Conclusion: A 12-mL paracervical block is noninferior to a 20-mL block for pain reduction with osmotic dilator insertion.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03356145. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Case: A 53-year-old woman presented with a locked knee after an atraumatic hyperextension episode. Imaging showed an anterior tilt of the patella hinging over the superior trochlear margin, consistent with a superior patellar dislocation. The patella spontaneously reduced on an intra-articular injection with 15 mL of lidocaine in normal saline, after which she was able to actively range her knee. Conclusion: Superior patellar dislocations are rare and usually result from a sudden forced contraction of the quadriceps, trapping the patella over superior trochlear osteophytes. Reduction is possible through an intra-articular local anesthetic injection, without manipulation of the patella. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We evaluated biological effects of distinct local anesthetics on human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells when applied to reduce periprocedural pain during mesenchymal stem cell injections. Methods and Materials: Metabolic activity (MTS assay), viability (Live/Dead stain), and gene expression (quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction) were measured in mesenchymal stem cells incubated with various concentrations of lidocaine, ropivacaine, or bupivacaine during a 12-hr time course. Results: Cell viability and metabolic activity decreased in a dose, time, and substance-specific manner after exposure to lidocaine, ropivacaine, and bupivacaine, with ropivacaine being the least cytotoxic. Cell viability decreases after brief exposure (<1.5 hrs) at clinically relevant concentrations (eg, 8 mg/ml of lidocaine, 2.5 mg/ml of ropivacaine or bupivacaine). Mesenchymal stem cells exposed to local anesthetics change their expression of mRNA biomarkers for stress response (EGR1, EGR2), proliferation (MKI67, HIST2H4A), ECM (COL1A1, COL3A1), and cell surface marker (CD105). Conclusions: Local anesthetics are cytotoxic to clinical-grade human mesenchymal stem cells in a dose-, time-, and agent-dependent manner and change expression of ECM, proliferation, and cell surface markers. Lidocaine and bupivacaine are more cytotoxic than ropivacaine. Single-dose injections of local anesthetics may affect the biological properties of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro but may not affect the effective dose of MSCs in a clinical setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND VYC-20L is a hyaluronic acid soft tissue filler with lidocaine designed to restore facial volume. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the safety and effectiveness of VYC-20L in patients with chin retrusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS Adults with chin retrusion were randomized (3:1) to receive VYC-20L in the chin at study onset (treatment group) or 6 months later (control group). The primary effectiveness end point was ≥1-point improvement on the Allergan Chin Retrusion Scale (ACRS) from baseline at Month 6. Safety assessments included injection site responses (ISRs) and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS VYC-20L was administered to 192 participants (treatment group, n = 144; control group, n = 48). At Month 6, significantly more participants had an ACRS response in the treatment versus control group (56.3% vs 27.5%; p = .0019). Effectiveness was also demonstrated by the proportion of participants with improved/much improved Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores and responses on the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Chin questionnaire and FACE-Q Psychological Wellbeing module. Treatment benefit remained evident at Month 12. Most common ISRs were tenderness (81.1%) and firmness (75.1%). One participant (0.5%) discontinued the study due to 2 treatment-related serious AEs of facial cellulitis and injection site inflammation, both resolved without sequelae. CONCLUSION VYC-20L significantly improved an ACRS response and was generally safe and well tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Osteosarcoma is the most common type of bone cancer in adolescents. There have been no significant improvements in outcomes since chemotherapy was first introduced. Bupivacaine and lidocaine have been shown to be toxic to certain malignancies. This study evaluates the effect of these medications on two osteosarcoma cell lines.Questions/purposes: (1) Does incubation of osteosarcoma cells with bupivacaine or lidocaine result in cell death? (2) Does this result from an apoptotic mechanism? (3) Is a specific apoptotic pathway implicated?Methods: Two cell lines were chosen to account for the inherent heterogeneity of osteosarcoma. UMR-108 is a transplantable cell line that has been used in multiple studies as a primary tumor. MNNG/HOS has a high metastatic rate in vivo. Both cell lines were exposed bupivacaine (0.27, 0.54, 1.08, 2.16, 4.33 and 8.66 mM) and lidocaine (0.66, 1.33, 5.33, 10.66, 21.32 and 42.64 mM) for 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours. These concentrations were determined by preliminary experiments that found the median effective dose was 1.4 mM for bupivacaine and 7.0 mM for lidocaine in both cell lines. Microculture tetrazolium and colony formation assay determined whether cell death occurred. Apoptosis induction was evaluated by phase-contrast micrographs, flow cytometry, DNA fragmentation and reactive oxygen species (ROS). The underlying pathways were analyzed by protein electrophoresis and Western blot. All testing was performed in triplicate and compared with pH-adjusted controls. Quantitative results were analyzed without blinding.Results: Both medications caused cell death in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Exposure to bupivacaine for 24 hours reduced viability of UMR-108 cells by 6 ± 0.75% (95% CI 2.9 to 9.11; p = 0.01) at 1.08 mM and 89.67 ± 1.5% (95% CI 82.2 to 95.5; p < 0.001) at 2.16 mM. Under the same conditions, MNNG/HOS viability was decreased in a similar fashion. After 24 hours, the viability of UMR-108 and MNNG/HOS cells exposed to 5.33 mM of lidocaine decreased by 25.33 ± 8.3% (95% CI 2.1 to 48.49; p = 0.03) and 39.33 ± 3.19% (95% CI 30.46 to 48.21; p < 0.001), respectively, and by 90.67 ± 0.66% (95% CI 88.82 to 92.52; p < 0.001) and 81.6 ± 0.47% (95% CI 79.69 to 82.31; p < 0.001) at 10.66 mM, respectively. After 72 hours, the viability of both cell lines was further reduced. Cell death was consistent with apoptosis based on cell morphology, total number of apoptotic cells and DNA fragmentation. The percentage increase of apoptotic UMR-108 and MNNG/HOS cells confirmed by Annexin-V positivity compared with controls was 21.3 ± 2.82 (95% CI 16.25 to 26.48; p < 0.001) and 21.23 ± 3.23% (95% CI 12.2 to 30.2; p = 0.003) for bupivacaine at 1.08 mM and 25.15 ± 4.38 (95% CI 12.9 to 37.3; p = 0.004) and 9.11 ± 1.74 (95% CI 4.35 to 13.87; p = 0.006) for lidocaine at 5.33 mM. The intrinsic apoptotic pathway was involved as the expression of Bcl-2 and survivin were down-regulated, and Bax, cleaved caspase-3 and cleaved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 were increased. ROS production increased in the UMR-108 cells but was decreased in the MNNG/HOS cells.Conclusion: These findings provide a basis for evaluating these medications in the in vivo setting. Studies should be performed in small animals to determine if clinically relevant doses have a similar effect in vivo. In humans, biopsies could be performed with standard doses of these medications to see if there is a difference in biopsy tract contamination on definitive resection.Clinical Relevance: Bupivacaine and lidocaine could potentially be used for their ability to induce and enhance apoptosis in local osteosarcoma treatment. Outcome data when these medications are used routinely during osteosarcoma treatment can be evaluated compared with controls. Further small animal studies should be performed to determine if injection into the tumor, isolated limb perfusion, or other modalities of treatment are viable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Heightened spontaneous activity in sensory neurons is often reported in individuals living with chronic pain. It is possible to study this activity in rodents using electrophysiology, but these experiments require great skill and can be prone to bias. Here, we have examined whether in vivo calcium imaging with GCaMP6s can be used as an alternative approach. We show that spontaneously active calcium transients can be visualised in the fourth lumbar dorsal root ganglion (L4 DRG) through in vivo imaging in a mouse model of inflammatory pain. Application of lidocaine to the nerve, between the inflamed site and the DRG, silenced spontaneous firing and revealed the true baseline level of calcium for spontaneously active neurons. We used these data to train a machine learning algorithm to predict when a neuron is spontaneously active. We show that our algorithm is accurate in 2 different models of pain: intraplantar complete Freund adjuvant and antigen-induced arthritis, with accuracies of 90.0% ±1.2 and 85.9% ±2.1, respectively, assessed against visual inspection by an experienced observer. The algorithm can also detect neuronal activity in imaging experiments generated in a different laboratory using a different microscope configuration (accuracy = 94.0% ±2.2). We conclude that in vivo calcium imaging can be used to assess spontaneous activity in sensory neurons and provide a Google Colaboratory Notebook to allow anyone easy access to our novel analysis tool, for the assessment of spontaneous neuronal activity in their own imaging setups., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Association for the Study of Pain.)

Background: There are few efficacious treatments for mechanical neck pain, with controlled trials suggesting efficacy for muscle relaxants and topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Although studies evaluating topical lidocaine for back pain have been disappointing, the more superficial location of the cervical musculature suggests a possible role for topical local anesthetics., Methods: This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial performed at four U.S. military, Veterans Administration, academic, and private practice sites, in which 76 patients were randomized to receive either placebo followed by lidocaine patch for 4-week intervals (group 1) or a lidocaine-then-placebo patch sequence. The primary outcome measure was mean reduction in average neck pain, with a positive categorical outcome designated as a reduction of at least 2 points in average neck pain coupled with at least a 5-point score of 7 points on the Patient Global Impression of Change scale at the 4-week endpoint., Results: For the primary outcome, the median reduction in average neck pain score was -1.0 (interquartile range, -2.0, 0.0) for the lidocaine phase versus -0.5 (interquartile range, -2.0, 0.0) for placebo treatment (P = 0.17). During lidocaine treatment, 27.7% of patients experienced a positive outcome versus 14.9% during the placebo phase (P = 0.073). There were no significant differences between treatments for secondary outcomes, although a carryover effect on pain pressure threshold was observed for the lidocaine phase (P = 0.015). A total of 27.5% of patients in the lidocaine group and 20.5% in the placebo group experienced minor reactions, the most common of which was pruritis (P = 0.36)., Conclusions: The differences favoring lidocaine were small and nonsignificant, but the trend toward superiority of lidocaine suggests more aggressive phenotyping and applying formulations with greater penetrance may provide clinically meaningful benefit.

Objectives: Caring for pediatric lacerations in the emergency department (ED) is typically painful because of irrigation and suturing. To improve this painful experience, we aimed to increase the use of a topical anesthetic, Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics (EMLA) on eligible pediatric lacerations with an attainable, sustainable, and measurable goal of 60%. The baseline rate of applying topical anesthetic to eligible lacerations was 23% in our ED. We aimed to increase the use of topical anesthetics on eligible pediatric lacerations to a measurable goal of 60% within 3 months of implementing our intervention., Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center, interrupted time series, ED quality improvement project from November 2019 to July 2020. A multidisciplinary team of physicians and nurses performed a cause-and-effect analysis identifying 2 key drivers: early placement of EMLA and physician buy-in on which we built our Plan, Do, Study, and Act (PDSA) cycles. We collected data on number of eligible patients receiving EMLA, as well as patient and physician feedback via phone calls within 2 days after encounter. Balancing measures included ED length of stay (LOS), patient and physician satisfaction with EMLA, and adverse effects of EMLA., Results: We needed 3 PDSA cycles to reach our goal of 60% in 3 months, which was also maintained for 5 months. The PDSA cycles used educational interventions, direct provider feedback about noncompliance, and patient satisfaction results obtained via phone calls. Balancing measures were minimally impacted: 75% good patient satisfaction, no adverse events but an increase in LOS of patients who received EMLA compared with those who did not (1.79 ± 0.66 vs 1.41 ± 0.83 hours, P < 0.001). The main reasons for dissatisfaction for physicians were the increased LOS and the preference for procedural sedation or intranasal medications., Conclusions: With a few simple interventions, our aim of applying EMLA to 60% of eligible pediatric lacerations was attained and maintained., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

BACKGROUND Topical anesthetics are used in noninvasive transdermal anesthesia to decrease the superficial pain sensation threshold during dermatologic surgery. Combined pain relief and sensitivity loss can avoid discomfort during the surgery. OBJECTIVE The aim of this placebo-controlled study was to compare the efficacy of 3 commonly used topical agents by collating loss of sensitivity over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three topical anesthetic creams, a topical anti-inflammatory cream, and a moisturizing cream were applied on the left volar forearm of each of the 48 healthy Caucasian participants. Sensitivity was assessed with the dynamic 2-point discrimination and the Semmes-Weinstein test at 0, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes after cream application. RESULTS After 180 minutes, benzocaine showed a significantly lower 2-point discrimination reduction than lidocaine alone and a lidocaine and prilocaine mixture. Sensory threshold measurements by the Semmes-Weinstein test after 60 minutes revealed a significantly higher effect with lidocaine alone and with the lidocaine and prilocaine mixture than with benzocaine. CONCLUSION The authors found a stronger skin sensitivity reduction by the eutectic lidocaine and prilocaine mixture and lidocaine alone compared with benzocaine. We suggest increased discomfort reduction in topical anesthetic supported dermatologic surgery by the eutectic mixture and lidocaine alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a complicated skin and soft tissue infection that has a high mortality rate and often requires surgical debridement, intravenous antibiotics, and wound care. The nurse practitioner needs to be aware of the common characteristics of NF and depending on their clinical environment, know when to refer the patient to a local emergency department (ED) for further evaluation and treatment and/or consult for hospital admission from an ED. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To test the antiseptic efficacy of povidone-iodine when mixed with topical lidocaine gel. Setting: Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Design: Experimental study. Methods: Staphylococcus epidermidis , Staphylococcus aureus , viridans streptococci (Streptococcus sanguinis), Escherichia coli , and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were grown on blood agar plates with povidone-iodine and/or lidocaine gel. The efficacy of sterilization was quantified by surviving bacterial colony-forming units. Results: Combination of povidone-iodine and lidocaine gel prevented bacterial growth to levels similar to povidone-iodine alone. Application of lidocaine gel to bacteria before povidone-iodine treatment allowed bacterial growth similar to controls not exposed to povidone-iodine. Conclusions: Povidone-iodine must be applied before lidocaine gel for effective antisepsis, but admixture of povidone-iodine with lidocaine gel was also effective and may reduce the risk of endophthalmitis associated with lidocaine gel use. This strategy offers a practice-changing alternative for preoperative prophylaxis in procedures requiring topical anesthesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Expert opinion-modified Delphi study.Objective: We used a modified Delphi approach to obtain consensus among leading spinal deformity surgeons and their neuroanesthesiology teams regarding optimal practices for obtaining reliable motor evoked potential (MEP) signals.Summary Of Background Data: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of transcranial MEPs provides the best method for assessing spinal cord integrity during complex spinal surgeries. MEPs are affected by pharmacological and physiological parameters. It is the responsibility of the spine surgeon and neuroanesthesia team to understand how they can best maintain high-quality MEP signals throughout surgery. Nevertheless, varying approaches to neuroanesthesia are seen in clinical practice.Methods: We identified 19 international expert spinal deformity treatment teams. A modified Delphi process with two rounds of surveying was performed. Greater than 50% agreement on the final statements was considered "agreement"; >75% agreement was considered "consensus."Results: Anesthesia regimens and protocols were obtained from the expert centers. There was a large amount of variability among centers. Two rounds of consensus surveying were performed, and all centers participated in both rounds of surveying. Consensus was obtained for 12 of 15 statements, and majority agreement was obtained for two of the remaining statements. Total intravenous anesthesia was identified as the preferred method of maintenance, with few centers allowing for low mean alveolar concentration of inhaled anesthetic. Most centers advocated for <150 μg/kg/min of propofol with titration to the lowest dose that maintains appropriate anesthesia depth based on awareness monitoring. Use of adjuvant intravenous anesthetics, including ketamine, low-dose dexmedetomidine, and lidocaine, may help to reduce propofol requirements without negatively effecting MEP signals.Conclusion: Spine surgeons and neuroanesthesia teams should be familiar with methods for optimizing MEPs during deformity and complex spinal cases. Although variability in practices exists, there is consensus among international spinal deformity treatment centers regarding best practices.Level Of Evidence: 5. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Various multimodal analgesic approaches have been proposed for spine surgery. The authors evaluated the effect of using a combination of four nonopioid analgesics versus placebo on Quality of Recovery, postoperative opioid consumption, and pain scores.Methods: Adults having multilevel spine surgery who were at high risk for postoperative pain were double-blind randomized to placebos or the combination of single preoperative oral doses of acetaminophen 1,000 mg and gabapentin 600 mg, an infusion of ketamine 5 µg/kg/min throughout surgery, and an infusion of lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg/h intraoperatively and during the initial hour of recovery. Postoperative analgesia included acetaminophen, gabapentin, and opioids. The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery 15-questionnaire (0 to 150 points, with 15% considered to be a clinically important difference) assessed on the third postoperative day. Secondary outcomes were opioid use in morphine equivalents (with 20% considered to be a clinically important change) and verbal-response pain scores (0 to 10, with a 1-point change considered important) over the initial postoperative 48 h.Results: The trial was stopped early for futility per a priori guidelines. The average duration ± SD of surgery was 5.4 ± 2.1 h. The mean ± SD Quality of Recovery score was 109 ± 25 in the pathway patients (n = 150) versus 109 ± 23 in the placebo group (n = 149); estimated difference in means was 0 (95% CI, -6 to 6, P = 0.920). Pain management within the initial 48 postoperative hours was not superior in analgesic pathway group: 48-h opioid consumption median (Q1, Q3) was 72 (48, 113) mg in the analgesic pathway group and 75 (50, 152) mg in the placebo group, with the difference in medians being -9 (97.5% CI, -23 to 5, P = 0.175) mg. Mean 48-h pain scores were 4.8 ± 1.8 in the analgesic pathway group versus 5.2 ± 1.9 in the placebo group, with the difference in means being -0.4 (97.5% CI; -0.8, 0.1, P = 0.094).Conclusions: An analgesic pathway based on preoperative acetaminophen and gabapentin, combined with intraoperative infusions of lidocaine and ketamine, did not improve recovery in patients who had multilevel spine surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the effects of buffered lidocaine on pain scores during vulvar biopsy.Methods: We conducted a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, using prefilled, sequentially numbered, randomized syringes to infiltrate either 3 mL of buffered or nonbuffered lidocaine before vulvar biopsy. The primary outcome was a pain score marked on a 100-mm visual analog scale during infiltration. Secondary outcomes included pain scores after the procedure and change from baseline to infiltration. Participants were recruited to detect a clinically meaningful 15-mm difference in pain scores between groups. Sample size was calculated based on the null hypothesis that the mean pain score would be the same in women treated with buffered lidocaine as in those treated with nonbuffered placebo based on prior studies. Categorical data were compared by Fisher exact test, and continuous data were compared between groups by t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test.Results: From July 2015 to April 2018, 129 participants were randomized to one of two groups: nonbuffered lidocaine or buffered lidocaine. One hundred twenty-five were analyzed (nonbuffered n=62, buffered n=63). Four patients were excluded. The majority of participants were non-Hispanic white women with a mean age of 59 years. There was no difference in the primary outcome of pain during infiltration with a mean pain score of 35.8 mm in the buffered lidocaine group compared with 42.2 in the nonbuffered lidocaine group (mean difference -6.4; 95% CI -18.4 to 5.6; P=.3 by Wilcoxon rank sum test). There was also no difference in secondary outcomes of pain over the entire procedure (mean difference -0.3, 95% CI -9.7 to 9.2; P=.7) or change in pain from baseline to infiltration (mean difference -6.9, 95% CI -18.4 to 4.7; P=.2).Conclusion: There was no difference in pain scores during vulvar biopsy infiltration between the buffered and nonbuffered lidocaine groups.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02698527. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare pain control during vulvar biopsy after either application of 5% lidocaine-prilocaine cream or injection of 1% lidocaine.Methods: In a single-site randomized trial, patients who needed vulvar biopsy on a non-hair-bearing surface were recruited from a gynecologic oncology clinic to compare lidocaine-prilocaine cream (placed at least 10 minutes before biopsy) with lidocaine injection (at least 1 minute prior). A sample size of 53 participants in each arm (N=106) was planned. Pain was recorded using a 100 mm visual analog scale at three time points: baseline, after application of anesthesia, and after biopsy. The primary outcome was highest pain score recorded. Secondary outcomes were pain score at biopsy, patient experience, and tolerability and acceptability. Linear regression was used to compare the primary outcome between arms while controlling for baseline vulvar pain. A convenience analysis was performed in March 2019.Results: From October 2018 to March 2019, 38 patients completed informed consent and were randomized. Participants were women with median age of 60 years. Most characteristics between groups were similar. Nineteen were analyzed in the lidocaine-prilocaine group, and 18 were analyzed in the lidocaine injection group. The median highest pain score in the lidocaine-prilocaine group was 20.0 mm vs 56.5 mm in the lidocaine injection group. Controlling for baseline pain, the highest pain score in the lidocaine-prilocaine arm was 25.7 mm lower than in the lidocaine injection arm (95% CI [-45.1 to -6.3]; P<.01). Patients randomized to lidocaine-prilocaine had a significantly better experience than those receiving injected lidocaine (median experience score 2.0 mm vs 17.0 mm; P=.02).Conclusion: Lidocaine-prilocaine cream before vulvar biopsy resulted in a lower maximum pain score and a significantly better patient rating of the biopsy experience when compared with lidocaine injection. Lidocaine-prilocaine cream, alone, is a reasonable option to use for vulvar biopsy.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03654417. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Antiarrhythmic drugs have not proven to significantly improve overall survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia. How this might be influenced by the route of drug administration is not known.Methods: In this prespecified analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial, we compared the differences in survival to hospital discharge in adults with shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who were randomly assigned by emergency medical services personnel to an antiarrhythmic drug versus placebo in the ALPS trial (Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Amiodarone, Lidocaine or Placebo Study), when stratified by the intravenous versus intraosseous route of administration.Results: Of 3019 randomly assigned patients with a known vascular access site, 2358 received ALPS drugs intravenously and 661 patients by the intraosseous route. Intraosseous and intravenous groups differed in sex, time-to-emergency medical services arrival, and some cardiopulmonary resuscitation characteristics, but were similar in others, including time-to-intravenous/intrasosseous drug receipt. Overall hospital discharge survival was 23%. In comparison with placebo, discharge survival was significantly higher in recipients of intravenous amiodarone (adjusted risk ratio, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.06-1.50]; adjusted absolute survival difference, 5.5% [95% CI, 1.5-9.5]) and intravenous lidocaine (adjusted risk ratio, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.02-1.45]; adjusted absolute survival difference, 4.7% [95% CI, 0.7-8.8]); but not in recipients of intraosseous amiodarone (adjusted risk ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.66-1.32]) or intraosseous lidocaine (adjusted risk ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.74-1.44]). Survival to hospital admission also increased significantly when drugs were given intravenously but not intraosseously, and favored improved neurological outcome at discharge. There were no outcome differences between intravenous and intraosseous placebo, indicating that the access route itself did not demarcate patients with poor prognosis. The study was underpowered to assess intravenous/intraosseous drug interactions, which were not statistically significant.Conclusions: We found no significant effect modification by drug administration route for amiodarone or lidocaine in comparison with placebo during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, point estimates for the effects of both drugs in comparison with placebo were significantly greater for the intravenous than for the intraosseous route across virtually all outcomes and beneficial only for the intravenous route. Given that the study was underpowered to statistically assess interactions, these findings signal the potential importance of the drug administration route during resuscitation that merits further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND Recently, the safety of lidocaine plus epinephrine use in outpatient surgery has come under scrutiny despite its long history of use in outpatient dermatologic procedures and surgeries. OBJECTIVE To assess the frequency of crash cart and other emergency interventions during Mohs micrographic surgery when lidocaine plus epinephrine is used as a local anesthetic and evaluate patient comorbidities associated with these events. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted in an outpatient Mohs micrographic surgery clinic. RESULTS One thousand one hundred twenty-seven Mohs cases were reviewed from the period of March 2015 to June 2016 with 864 meeting the inclusion criteria of patient weight, medical history, and amount of lidocaine administered recorded. No adverse events requiring emergency intervention with a crash cart or transfer to the emergency department occurred despite a patient population with advanced age and a wide range of comorbidities. CONCLUSION No serious adverse events requiring emergency intervention were associated with lidocaine with epinephrine doses administered below the Food and Drug Administration recommended maximum. The authors did not find evidence from this study or after a literature search to support the requirement for a crash cart and other emergency equipment to be present during procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of review Recurrent exposure to opioids can lead to development of opioid tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia through activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists ketamine and lidocaine can modulate development of opioid tolerance and OIH. This study evaluated the utility of ketamine and/or lidocaine in decreasing opioid consumption during acute pain episodes in adolescents with sickle cell disease. There has been an increased effort to promote opioidsparing pain relieving methods given the ongoing opioid epidemic. Recent findings There have been six studies published over the past decade that highlight the ability of ketamine to reduce opioid consumption in the management of sickle cell disease-related pain, primarily in adult patients. There has been one study (2015) that demonstrated a similar benefit with lidocaine, however this was also in adult patients. Summary We retrospectively evaluated treatment with ketamine and/or lidocaine infusions in adolescents hospitalized for vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC). Patients served as self-controls using a comparison with a previous control admission for VOC. The use of ketamine and/or lidocaine as adjuncts to opioids resulted in lower daily opioid consumption in three of four patients. Our study suggests that ketamine and/or lidocaine infusions may be useful adjuncts in reducing opioid exposure during VOC pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Ozone has been recently used as a safe alternative treatment in musculoskeletal disorders with fewer adverse effects than corticosteroids. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a single injection of ozone with that of a corticosteroid in the treatment of shoulder impingement. Design: Thirty patientswith shoulder pain and clinical signs and symptoms of impingement were randomly assigned into two groups: ultrasoundguided injection with ozone or corticosteroid. Patients' symptoms were evaluated by visual analog scale, constant score, shoulder pain and disability scale, shoulder range of motion, and ultrasonographic measures before treatment, 2 wks, and 2 mos after injections. Results: Patients' visual analog scale, shoulder pain and disability scale and constant score improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.001), but the benefits were in favor of corticosteroid group (P < 0.001). At intervals between the two follow-ups, an improvement was observed in the visual analog scale score among patients receiving ozone, whereas during the same interval, patients' pain slightly worsened in the corticosteroid group. The range of motion and ultrasonographic measures did not show statistical differences between the two groups. Conclusions: Corticosteroid injection improves the pain and disability scores more significantly than a one-time ozone injection. Ozone may serve as an alternative modality in treating shoulder impingement when the use of steroids is contraindicated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Mechanical ventilation can cause ventilator-induced brain injury via afferent vagal signaling and hippocampal neurotransmitter imbalances. The triggering mechanisms for vagal signaling during mechanical ventilation are unknown. The objective of this study was to assess whether pulmonary transient receptor potential vanilloid type-4 (TRPV4) mechanoreceptors and vagal afferent purinergic receptors (P2X) act as triggers of ventilator-induced brain injury.Design: Controlled, human in vitro and ex vivo studies, as well as murine in vivo laboratory studies.Setting: Research laboratory.Subjects: Wild-type, TRPV4-deficient C57BL/6J mice, 8-10 weeks old. Human postmortem lung tissue and human lung epithelial cell line BEAS-2B.Intervention: Mice subjected to mechanical ventilation were studied using functional MRI to assess hippocampal activity. The effects of lidocaine (a nonselective ion-channel inhibitor), P2X-purinoceptor antagonist (iso-PPADS), or genetic TRPV4 deficiency on hippocampal dopamine-dependent pro-apoptotic signaling were studied in mechanically ventilated mice. Human lung epithelial cells (BEAS-2B) were used to study the effects of mechanical stretch on TRPV4 and P2X expression and activation. TRPV4 levels were measured in postmortem lung tissue from ventilated and nonventilated patients.Measurements and Main Results: Hippocampus functional MRI analysis revealed considerable changes in response to the increase in tidal volume during mechanical ventilation. Intratracheal lidocaine, iso-PPADS, and TRPV4 genetic deficiency protected mice against ventilationinduced hippocampal pro-apoptotic signaling. Mechanical stretch in both, BEAS-2B cells and ventilated wild-type mice, resulted in TRPV4 activation and reduced Trpv4 and P2x expression. Intratracheal replenishment of adenosine triphosphate in Trpv4 mice abrogated the protective effect of TRPV4 deficiency. Autopsy lung tissue from ventilated patients showed decreased lung TRPV4 levels compared with nonventilated CONCLUSIONS:: TRPV4 mechanosensors and purinergic receptors are involved in the mechanisms of ventilator-induced brain injury. Inhibition of this neural signaling, either using nonspecific or specific inhibitors targeting the TRPV4/adenosine triphosphate/P2X signaling axis, may represent a novel strategy to prevent or treat ventilator-induced brain injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neuropathic pain is frequently driven by ectopic impulse discharge (ectopia) generated in injured peripheral afferent neurons. Observations in the spinal nerve ligation (SNL) model in rats suggest that cell bodies in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) contribute 3 times more to the ectopic barrage than the site of nerve injury (neuroma). The DRG is therefore a prime interventional target for pain control. Since DRG ectopia is selectively suppressed with lidocaine at concentrations too low to block axonal impulse propagation, we asked whether targeted delivery of dilute lidocaine to the L5 DRG can relieve L5 SNL-induced tactile allodynia without blocking normal sensation or motor function. Results showed that intraforaminal injection of 10-µL bolus doses of 0.2% lidocaine suppressed allodynia transiently, while sustained infusion over 2 weeks using osmotic minipumps suppressed it for the duration of the infusion. Bolus injections of morphine or fentanyl were ineffective. Lidocaine applied to the cut spinal nerve end or the L4 DRG did not affect allodynia, suggesting that discharge originating in the neuroma and in neighboring "uninjured" afferents makes at best a minor contribution. Spike electrogenesis in the DRG is apparently the primary driver of tactile allodynia in the SNL model of neuropathic pain, and it can be controlled selectively by superfusing the relevant DRG(s) with nonblocking concentrations of lidocaine. This approach has potential clinical application in conditions such as postherpetic neuralgia and phantom limb pain in which one or only a few identifiable ganglia are implicated as pain drivers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Localized neuropathic pain symptoms are reported after knee surgery in 30% to 50% of patients. 5% lidocaine plaster (LP5) is recommended for localized neuropathic pain, but evidence in postsurgery neuropathic pain is missing. This study focuses on the effectiveness of LP5 on allodynia, hyperalgesia, and thermal stimuli in postsurgery knee localized neuropathic pain. A randomized double-blind, 2 parallel groups, controlled trial (NCT02763592) took place in 36 patients (age, 69.4 ± 7.3 years) at the Clinical Pharmacology Center, University Hospital Clermont-Ferrand, France. Patients randomly received LP5 or placebo plaster during 3 months. Neuropathic pain intensity and several parameters (dynamic mechanical allodynia, mechanical [von Frey], heat and cold detection and pain thresholds [Pathway Medoc], and size of the allodynic area were recorded at each visit [inclusion, day 7, 15, month 1, 2, and 3]). From day 7 onwards, dynamic mechanical allodynia diminished progressively of ≥ 30% over 3 months (P = 0.003) in 96% of patients (23/24) and of ≥ 50% in 83% of patients (20/24). Cold pain and maximal mechanical pain thresholds improved over 3 months (P = 0.001 and P = 0.007, respectively). This study shows for the first time the effectiveness of LP5 on dynamic mechanical allodynia, pain, pressure, and cold thresholds over 3 months in knee localized neuropathic pain. Beyond the inhibition of sodium channels by LP5, these findings suggest the involvement of cold and mechanical receptors that participate to pain chronicisation and also of the non-negligible placebo effect of the patch, items that need to be explored further and challenged in other etiologies of localized neuropathic pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction and Aims: Patients with opioid use disorder experience great challenges during acute pain management due to opioid tolerance or withdrawal symptoms. Previous studies have recommended the use of adjuvant drugs in these patients. In this study, we compared the effect of intraoperative lidocaine with ketamine in postoperative pain management of these patients. Design and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 180 patients with opioid use disorder who underwent orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated into 3 groups. Patients in groups A, B, and C received intravenous lidocaine, ketamine, or normal saline, respectively, during the operation. Then, postoperative pain scores, analgesic requirements, patient satisfaction, and patient sleepiness were recorded and compared among the 3 groups. Results: Numerical rating scales during the first hour postoperation were significantly lower in the lidocaine group than in the ketamine or control group (P  < 0.001). The mean total amount of morphine consumption during the first 24-hour postoperation was 14.49 ± 26.89, 16.59 ± 30.65, and 21.72 ± 43.29 mg in the lidocaine, ketamine, and control group, respectively, being significantly lower in the lidocaine group in comparison with the other groups (P  < 0.001). Patients in the lidocaine group were less restless, calmer, and less drowsy than patients in the ketamine and control group (P  < 0.001). Discussion and Conclusion: According to these findings, systemic lidocaine is more effective than systemic ketamine to improve the quality of acute pain management without causing any significant complications in patients with opioid use disorder. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of the depth of local anesthesia application on procedural pain during lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection. Design: Sixty-eight patients were enrolled who were scheduled for single-level, unilateral fluoroscopically guided lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either subcutaneous local anesthesia (group S) or deep local anesthesia (group D) for transforaminal epidural steroid injection. The data related to pain and technical performance during the procedure was compared. In addition, the incidence of injection site soreness was assessed 2 wks after transforaminal epidural steroid injection. Results: Sixty-seven patients completed all assessments (group S, n = 33; group D, n = 34). There was no significant difference in procedural pain and discomfort level between the groups (P = 0.151, P = 0.183, respectively). Patients in group D showed lower behavioral pain scores (P = 0.017). There was no significant difference in the numbers of needle manipulations, fluoroscopy time, and radiation dose during the procedure between the groups. Two patients in group S and three in group D complained of injection site soreness after transforaminal epidural steroid injection for a few days, but there was no significant difference in its incidence (P = 0.667). Conclusions: Deep local anesthesia to reduce procedural pain during transforaminal epidural steroid injection seems to have no significant clinical benefit compared with conventional subcutaneous local anesthesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: The mixing of hyaluronic acid or calcium hydroxylapatite fillers with normal saline, plain lidocaine, or lidocaine with epinephrine before injection is a familiar practice among dermatologists. However, the frequency of this practice and rationale behind it has not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: To better elucidate the clinical practice of mixing fillers with other solutions before injecting among dermatologists. METHODS : A survey was electronically distributed to members of the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery. RESULTS : Four hundred seventy-five dermatologists responded to the survey. Thirty-five percent of respondents mix fillers before injection. Solutions used were as follows: plain lidocaine (44%), lidocaine with epinephrine (36%), normal saline (30%), and sterile water (7%). Respondents mix filler for the following reasons: to decrease viscosity (40%), increase anesthesia (30%), decrease swelling (17%), and increase volume (13%). CONCLUSION : Despite the lack of evidence, more than one-third of dermatologists surveyed mix fillers with other solutions before injection. Plain lidocaine is most commonly used. The top reason for mixing fillers is to decrease viscosity and facilitate ease of injection. More scientific data are needed to support this practice and better understand the biophysical changes that occur when mixing fillers with other solutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Notalgia paresthetica is a rarely reported T2-T6 sensory neuropathy whose etiology and treatment are not fully established. Although it is believed to be common in dermatological practice, it remains underrecognized, underdiagnosed, and therefore underreported. This case-report provides a physical medicine and rehabilitation perspective on notalgia paresthetica diagnosis and treatment. This article presents a case report of a 39-yr-old woman with pain, pruritus, and a hyperpigmented area in the right dorsal infra scapular region. The diagnosis of notalgia paresthetica was established. She was successfully treated with topical anesthetics, postural corrective exercises, scapular muscle strengthening, and pectoral muscle stretching. In this context, different treatment options were reviewed. A small set of pharmacological and nonpharmacological techniques were identified. Several of these modalities belong to the physical medicine and rehabilitation field of action. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article explores recent advancements in various medical fields: Cardiovascular Medicine delves into IV iron supplementation's impact on heart failure; Oncology discusses lidocaine injections in breast cancer surgeries, and Infectious Diseases examines nutritional supplementation's role in preventing tuberculosis. It also highlights Family Medicine's focus on over-the-counter opioid antagonists for opioid overdose treatment.