Search

Background: Standard triple therapy is commonly prescribed Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen in Europe. However, the world is witnessing declines in eradication success. It is crucial to find better treatment options., Aims: To evaluate efficacy, compliance and side effects of H. pylori eradication treatment by adding Saccharomyces boulardii ., Methods: We conducted a randomized clinical trial within the GISTAR cohort, consisting of healthy individuals aged 40-64 years. Participants were administered clarithromycin-containing triple therapy (clarithromycin 500 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, esomeprazole 40 mg) twice daily. Randomization was applied based on two factors: 1)addition of Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 500 mg BID or not; 2)treatment duration of 10 or 14 days. Treatment completion and adverse events were assessed via telephone interview 21-28 days after medication delivery. The efficacy was evaluated using a 13C-urea breath test (UBT) six months after treatment., Results: Altogether 404 participants were enrolled; data on adverse events were available from 391. Overall, 286 participants received follow-up UBT. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed higher eradication rates for 10-day probiotic treatment (70.8% vs. 54.6%, P  = 0.022), but not for 14-day. Probiotic subgroups combined showed non-significantly higher efficacy in per-protocol analysis (90.6% vs. 85.0%, P  = 0.183). S. boulardii reduced the frequency of adverse events ( P  = 0.033) in 14-day regimen, particularly treatment-associated diarrhea ( P  = 0.032). However, after the adjustment to control Type I error, results lost their significance., Conclusion: Addition of S. boulardii to 14-day clarithromycin-containing triple regimen non-significantly lowers the likelihood of diarrhea and does not increase the eradication rate., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The role of autoimmunity in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer remains controversial. We studied antiparietal cell antibody (anti-PCA) and anti-intrinsic factor antibody (anti-IFA) levels and their associations with pepsinogen I/pepsinogen II levels in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma compared to a control group with mild or no atrophy of the stomach mucosa. Plasma levels of anti-PCA and anti-IFA were measured by ELISA (Inova Diagnostics Inc, San Diego, California, USA). The cutoff value for anti-PCA and anti-IFA positivity was ≥25 units. Altogether 214 patients (126 men, 88 women, median age 64.46, range: 35-86) with confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma and 214 control cases paired for age and sex were included in the study. Positive anti-PCA was present in 22 (10.3%) gastric cancer patients and controls (P ≥ 0.999); positive anti-IFA in 6 (2.8%) and 4 (1.9.%), P < 0.232, respectively. We did not find significant differences in anti-PCA and anti-IFA positivity between gastric cancer patients and the control group; further investigation is required to better understand the potential involvement of autoimmune gastritis in the development of gastric cancer., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Global collaboration in cardio-oncology is needed to understand the prevalence of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity in different risk groups, practice settings, and geographic locations. There are limited data on the socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities that may impact access to care and outcomes. To address these gaps, we established the Global Cardio-Oncology Registry, a multinational, multicenter prospective registry., Methods: We assembled cardiologists and oncologists from academic and community settings to collaborate in the first Global Cardio-Oncology Registry. Subsequently, a survey for site resources, demographics, and intention to participate was conducted. We designed an online data platform to facilitate this global initiative., Results: A total of 119 sites responded to an online questionnaire on their practices and main goals of the registry: 49 US sites from 23 states and 70 international sites from 5 continents indicated a willingness to participate in the Global Cardio-Oncology Registry. Sites were more commonly led by cardiologists (85/119; 72%) and were more often university/teaching (81/119; 68%) than community based (38/119; 32%). The average number of cardio-oncology patients treated per month was 80 per site. The top 3 Global Cardio-Oncology Registry priorities in cardio-oncology care were breast cancer, hematologic malignancies, and patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Executive and scientific committees and specific committees were established. A pilot phase for breast cancer using Research Electronic Data Capture Cloud platform recently started patient enrollment., Conclusions: We present the structure for a global collaboration. Information derived from the Global Cardio-Oncology Registry will help understand the risk factors impacting cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity in different geographic locations and therefore contribute to reduce access gaps in cardio-oncology care. Risk calculators will be prospectively derived and validated., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Teske has received speaker fees from Philips and Abbott; consulting from Nordic Pharma. Dr Neilan reports consulting from BMS, Abbvie, Sanofi, Genentech, Roche, and C4-Therapeutics; grant funding from BMS and AZ. Dr López-Fernández has received speaker fees from Philips, Janssen, and Incyte. Dr Szmit has received speaker fees from Amgen, Angelini, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, and Pfizer. Dr Guha is supported by American Heart Association-Strategically Focused Research Network Grant in Disparities in Cardio-Oncology (847740 and 863620). Dr Iakobishvili has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer, Novo-Nordisk, and Bayer. Dr Sverdlov is supported by the National Heart Foundation of Australia Future Leader Fellowship (Award ID 106025) and reports research grants from the Medical Research Future Fund (Australia), NSW Health (Australia), Cancer Institute NSW (Australia), Hunter Medical Research Institute (Australia), Biotronik, RACE Oncology, Bristol Myer Squibb, Roche Diagnostics, and Vifor; and personal speaker fees from Novartis, Bayer, Bristol Myer Squibb, AstraZeneca, and Boehringer Ingelheim. The other authors report no conflicts.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to determine the proportion of gastric cancer patients with decreased levels of pepsinogen and gastrin-17 in plasma, with the goal of providing indirect evidence of the sensitivity of these biomarkers when applied in a cancer screening setting., Methods: The levels of pepsinogens I and II, gastrin-17, and Helicobacter pylori immunoglobulin antibodies in plasma samples of gastric cancer patients were evaluated using the GastroPanel test system (Biohit Oyj, Helsinki, Finland). A decreased level of the pepsinogen I/II ratio was defined as less than three, while a decrease in gastrin-17 was defined as less than 1 pmol/L. Univariate analysis using non-parametric tests was used to investigate differences between normal and low concentrations of biomarkers., Results: In total, 481 plasma samples from patients (59.9% male) with a median age of 64 years (ranging from 27 to 88 years) were analyzed. Out of the 400 cases of gastric cancer (83.2% of the total), 182 were categorized as the intestinal type, 141 as the diffuse type, 60 as the mixed type, and 17 as indeterminate according to the Lauren classification system. The H. pylori immunoglobulin test was positive in 74.0% of the patients. Pepsinogen I/II ratio was decreased in 32.4% (36.8% of the intestinal type); gastrin-17 in 12.3% (10.1% of the antral region) of all cases., Conclusion: The majority of gastric cancer patients had normal levels of pepsinogen and gastrin-17, suggesting that these biomarkers have limited application as screening tools in the Caucasian population., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To identify dietary and lifestyle factors associated with decreased pepsinogen levels indicative of gastric atrophy., Methods: Participants aged 40 to 64 from the "Multicentric randomized study of H. pylori eradication and pepsinogen testing for prevention of gastric cancer mortality (GISTAR study)" in Latvia tested for serum pepsinogen, as well as for Helicobacter pylori infection by 13 C-urea breath test or serology were included. Data on sex, age, education, employment, diet, smoking, alcohol and proton pump inhibitor use were obtained by survey and compared for participants with and without serologically detected gastric atrophy defined as pepsinogen I/pepsinogen II ≤ 2 and pepsinogen I ≤ 30 ng/mL., Results: Of 3001 participants (median age 53, interquartile range, 11.0, 36.9% male) 52.8% had H. pylori and 7.7% had serologically detected gastric atrophy. In multivariate analysis, increasing age, consumption of alcohol, coffee, and onions were positively, while H. pylori , former smoking, pickled product and proton pump inhibitor use were inversely associated with gastric atrophy. Pepsinogen values were higher in smokers and those with H. pylori . Pepsinogen ratio was lower in those with H. pylori . When stratifying by H. pylori presence, significantly higher pepsinogen levels remained for smokers without H. pylori ., Conclusion: Several dietary factors and smoking were associated with serologically detected gastric atrophy. Pepsinogen levels differed by smoking and H. pylori status, which may affect the serologic detection of gastric atrophy. There seems to be a complicated interaction between multiple factors. A prospective study including atrophy determined by both serology and histology is necessary., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The clarithromycin-based triple therapy is the most prescribed Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen in Europe; it causes adverse effects in a significant proportion of subjects, leading to discontinuation. Alternative therapies are required because of increasing clarithromycin resistance or to decrease the adverse effects., Aims: We compared the efficacy and spectrum of adverse effects of clarithromycin-based triple therapy with the high-dose amoxicillin/bismuth regimen., Methods: A randomised clinical trial enrolled healthy individuals aged 40-64 years. H. pylori was assessed with a 13C-urea breath test. In total 579 H. pylori-positive subjects were randomly allocated in two groups: group 1: clarithromycin 500 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, esomeprazole 40 mg, all twice daily; group 2: bismuth subcitrate 240 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1000 mg three times daily, esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily. Regimens were administered for 14 days.Information on treatment completion and adverse effects were collected via a telephone interview at 21-28 days after medication delivery. The efficacy was assessed by UBT 6 months after the treatment., Results: We analysed 483 subjects for adverse effects (248 vs. 235 respectively). Furthermore, 316 subjects were analysed for efficacy. In per-protocol analysis, a higher efficacy was seen in group 1 (88.4 vs. 77.0%; P < 0.001); no difference was observed in compliance (90.3 and 91.2%). Therapy-related adverse effects were more common in group 1 (56.9 vs. 40.0%; P < 0.01). In intention-to-treat analysis no statistical difference in efficacy was revealed., Conclusions: Bismuth-based high-dose amoxicillin therapy showed a lower efficacy but was less frequently associated with adverse effects. Further research is required to examine the high-dose amoxicillin and bismuth-containing regimens in various populations to maximise eradication efficacy., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Search-and-treat strategy for Helicobacter pylori and surveillance of patients with precancerous lesions are recommended to decrease the burden of gastric cancer in high-risk areas. We aimed to evaluate the acceptance of the target population to these strategies., Methods: We applied a search-and-treat strategy combined with biomarker screening (pepsinogens I and II, gastrin-17) for atrophic gastritis to healthy individuals aged 40-64 years within the GISTAR Pilot study. Different means of invitation were evaluated - direct telephone calls, letters of invitation via the general practitioners. Participants with altered biomarker results were invited to undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. H.pylori positive individuals were offered eradication therapy. Data on the compliance to the treatment and reasons for noncompliance were collected via telephone., Results: Altogether 3453 participants were enrolled. The attendance of women participants was 1.9 times higher although active invitation strategies were mainly targeting men. The yield for the telephone invitations was higher than for mail-delivered invitations (2.1 calls vs. 7.7 letters required to recruit one study subject). Out of 661 individuals reached with the invitation to undergo upper endoscopy, 520 (78.7%) attended the procedure. Out of 1185 study subjects eligible for eradication, 810 (68.4%) accepted it. Of those having received the medication, 765(94.4%) completed it. The reasons for nonparticipation were the overall misconception of the importance of screening, busy schedule and others., Conclusions: While only the minority of the target population participated in the gastric cancer prevention strategy, relatively high compliance was seen among the participants. The acceptance rate and the identified reasons for refusing to participate in our study indicate that there is a need to raise gastric cancer awareness and its existent preventive strategies within the general population for their successful implementation in the community., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Clinical guidelines recommend particular approaches, including 'screen-and-treat' strategy for Helicobacter pylori, to prevent gastric cancer. However, little of this is implemented in clinical practice. The aim of the study was to identify barriers to implementation of international guidelines. A web-based questionnaire distributed globally to specialists in the field. Altogether 886 responses from 75 countries were received. Of the responders, 570 (64%) were men of mean age 47 years. There were 606 gastroenterologists and 65 epidemiologists among the responders. Altogether, 79.8% of the responders disagreed that the burden of gastric cancer is a diminishing problem. 'Screen-and-treat' strategy for H. pylori in the responder's country was considered appropriate by 44.4%, inappropriate by 24.3%, with 31.3% being uncertain. Population-based screening for gastric cancer was considered appropriate in the respective home-country by 62.2%, in other areas - but not the home country - by 27.6%, and inappropriate by 10.2%. As a screening tool, upper endoscopy was acceptable by 35.6%, upper X-ray series by 55.3%, pepsinogens by 26.2% and breath-tests by 23.4%; accuracy, cost-effectiveness and feasibility among the tests varied widely. The attitude towards H. pylori vaccination was that 4.6% of the responders were eager to start vaccination immediately, 55.9% were supporting vaccination but considered that more data are required 12% were negative, and 27.6% did not have an opinion. In general, the attitude of the specialists was in line with guidelines, but was not always translated into clinical practice, particularly in the case of 'screen-and-treat' strategy.

Smoking has been associated with acquisition and increased persistence of Helicobacter pylori infection, as well as with lower effectiveness of its eradication. A greater prevalence of infection among smokers could contribute to the increased risk for gastric cancer. We aimed to estimate the association between smoking and seropositivity to H. pylori through an individual participant data pooled analysis using controls from 14 case-control studies participating in the Stomach Cancer Pooling Project. Summary odds ratios and prevalence ratios (PRs), adjusted for age, sex and social class, and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated through random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I statistic and publication bias with Egger's test. There was no significant association between smoking (ever vs. never) and H. pylori seropositivity (adjusted odds ratio = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.89-1.32; adjusted PR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.98-1.05). The strength of the association did not increase with the intensity or duration of smoking; stratified analyses according to sex, age, region or type of sample did not yield a consistent pattern of variation or statistically significant results, except for participants younger than 55 years and who had been smoking for more than 30 years (adjusted PR = 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02-1.15). This is the first collaborative analysis providing pooled estimates for the association between smoking and H. pylori seropositivity, based on detailed and uniform information and adjusting for major covariates. The results do not support an association between smoking and H. pylori infection.

The identification of novel cancer-related and immunogenic proteins is still a challenge to be faced to improve antigen-specific tumor immunotherapy. The category of so-called cancer-testis (CT) antigens is one of the most perspective groups of proteins for anticancer immune response activation as normally they are expressed in immunoprivileged tissues and are immunogenic if aberrantly generated in tumors. The heterogeneous group of proteins called sperm-associated antigens (SPAG) might encompass novel CT antigens owing to their common expression in male germ cells, their ability to elicit immune response underlying infertility, and lately proposed oncogenic properties. We carried out a comprehensive analysis of the expression pattern in various normal and cancerous tissues and assessed the frequency of spontaneous humoral immune response against members of the SPAG group in cancer patients using phage-displayed antigen microarrays. Our results show that out of 15 analyzed SPAG genes only SPAG1, SPAG6, SPAG8, SPAG15, and SPAG17 are predominantly expressed in testis, whereas the others are ubiquitously expressed with only a testis-associated alternative splice variant of SPAG16. mRNA expression of SPAG1, SPAG6, and alternative splice variants of SPAG8, SPAG16, and SPAG17 was elevated in various tumors with frequencies ranging from approximately 10% to 70%. The upregulation of SPAG6 in lung and breast cancer was confirmed by immunohistochemical analysis of tumor and normal tissue microarrays. Cancer-associated spontaneous humoral immune response was detected against SPAG1, SPAG6, SPAG8, and a novel testis-specific splice variant of SPAG17 and ascribe these as novel CT antigens that potentially are applicable as immunotherapeutic targets and serologic biomarkers.