Search

There is no entirely satisfactory way to monitor nerve root integrity during spinal surgery. In particular, standard free-running electromyography carries a high false-positive rate and some false-negative rate of injury. Stimulated electromyography to direct root stimulation can only be done intermittently, and roots are often inaccessible. This article reviews to what extent muscle motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring might help. It presents background considerations, describes MEP methodology, and summarizes relevant experimental animal and clinical studies. Based on current evidence, root compromise can cause myotomal MEP deterioration that in some cases may be reversible. However, because of radicular overlap, limited sampling, confounding factors, and response variability, the effects range from no appreciable change to variable degrees of amplitude reduction to disappearance and some false-positive and false-negative results should be expected. For root monitoring, multichannel MEP recordings should span adjacent myotomes and avoid mixed myotome derivations. Only amplitude reduction warning criteria have been studied, but no percentage cutoff consensus has emerged, and this approach is troubled by response variability. There is some evidence that MEPs might reduce false electromyographic results. In conclusion, muscle MEPs could compliment electromyography but seem unlikely to completely solve the problem of nerve root monitoring.

Thoracoabdominal aneurysm surgery carries an approximate 10% risk of intraoperative paraplegia. Abrupt cord ischemia and the confounding effects of systemic alterations and limb or cerebral ischemia challenges neurophysiologic spinal cord monitoring. This investigation sought a rapid differential monitoring approach to predict or help prevent paraplegia. Thirty-one patients were monitored with motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and median and tibial somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs). MEPs involved single-pulse transcranial electrical stimulation with D wave recording (n = 16), arm and leg muscle MEPs following multiple-pulse transcranial electrical stimulation (n = 12), or both (n = 3). D wave recordings required averaging, invasive epidural electrode insertion, and produced both false positives and false negatives. Muscle MEPs were instantaneous and reliably sensitive and specific for cord ischemia. Cortical and peripheral nerve SSEPs provided rapid detection of systemic alterations and cerebral or limb ischemia. Cord and subcortical SSEPs required excessive averaging time. In conclusion, bilateral arm and leg muscle MEPs with median and tibial peripheral nerve and cortical SSEPs provide sufficiently rapid detection and differentiation of cord ischemia from confounding factors. There were two predicted intraoperative spinal cord infarctions (6.5%) and nine circumstantial examples of possible contributions to deficit prevention.