Search

BACKGROUND: Over the past 25 years, diagnosis and therapy for acute aortic dissection (AAD) have evolved. We aimed to study the effects of these iterative changes in care. METHODS: Patients with nontraumatic AAD enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (61 centers; 15 countries) were divided into time-based tertiles (groups) from 1996 to 2022. The impact of changes in diagnostics, therapeutic care, and in-hospital and 3-year mortality was assessed. Cochran-Armitage trend and Jonckheere-Terpstra tests were conducted to test for any temporal trend. RESULTS: Each group consisted of 3785 patients (mean age, ≈62 years old; ≈65.5% males); nearly two-thirds had type A AAD. Over time, the rates of hypertension increased from 77.8% to 80.4% (P=0.002), while smoking (34.1% to 30.6%, P=0.033) and atherosclerosis decreased (25.6%-16.6%; P<0.001). Across groups, the percentage of surgical repair of type A AAD increased from 89.1% to 92.5% (P<0.001) and was associated with decreased hospital mortality (from 24.1% in group 1 to 16.7% in group 3; P<0.001). There was no difference in 3-year survival (P=0.296). For type B AAD, stent graft therapy (thoracic endovascular aortic repair) was used more frequently (22.3%-35.9%; P<0.001), with a corresponding decrease in open surgery. Endovascular in-hospital mortality decreased from 9.9% to 6.2% (P=0.003). As seen with the type A AAD cohort, overall 3-year mortality for patients with type B AAD was consistent over time (P=0.084). CONCLUSIONS: Over 25 years, substantial improvements in-hospital survival were associated with a more aggressive surgical approach for patients with type A AAD. Open surgery has been partially supplanted by thoracic endovascular aortic repair for complicated type B AAD, and in-hospital mortality has decreased over the time period studied. Postdischarge survival for up to 3 years was similar over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In 2010, the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology released guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease, which identified high-risk clinical features to assist in the early detection of acute aortic dissection. The sensitivity of these risk markers has not been validated., Methods and Results: We examined patients enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection from 1996 to 2009. The number of patients with confirmed acute aortic dissection who presented with 1 or more of 12 proposed clinical risk markers was determined. An aortic dissection detection (ADD) risk score of 0 to 3 was calculated on the basis of the number of risk categories (high-risk predisposing conditions, high-risk pain features, high-risk examination features) in which patients met criteria. The ADD risk score was tested for sensitivity. Of 2538 patients with acute aortic dissection, 2430 (95.7%) were identified by 1 or more of 12 proposed clinical risk markers. With the use of the ADD risk score, 108 patients (4.3%) were identified as low risk (ADD score 0), 927 patients (36.5%) were intermediate risk (ADD score 1), and 1503 patients (59.2%) were high risk (ADD score 2 or 3). Among 108 patients with no clinical risk markers present (ADD score 0), 72 had chest x-rays recorded, of which 35 (48.6%) demonstrated a widened mediastinum., Conclusions: The clinical risk markers proposed in the 2010 thoracic aortic disease guidelines and their application as part of the ADD risk score comprise a highly sensitive clinical tool for the detection of acute aortic dissection.