Search

The objective of this research was to examine the performance of a brief patient survey about quality of care received in community-based diagnostic and therapeutic facilities. The survey was administered to patients in 44 facilities that were also scheduled for a formal external assessment. The response rate was 53%. Patients generally rated their care positively; 18.5% of patients rated at least 1 item as fair or poor. The amount of information received about risks and complications was rated least favorably; concern and caring shown by staff was rated most favorably. The 10 items which patients rated regarding aspects of quality formed an internally consistent scale (alpha = .93). Patients' ratings were not useful predictors of assessor ratings. Although patients' ratings cannot substitute for expert on-site assessments, they are an important part of a quality management program. The patient survey provides additional, complementary information about components of quality care that are important to them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between exercise frequency and health care costs associated with medical and pharmacy claims among a 10-year employee cohort., Methods: The relationship between self-reported exercise (days/week) and health care costs was analyzed with negative binomial regression, using an integrated database involving 32,044 person-years and linking employee demographics, health risk appraisal information, and health insurance claims., Results: An association demonstrating exercise frequency lowering health care costs was present in most medical and prescription drug categories and was strongest among employees reporting 2 to 3 and 4 to 5 days/week of exercise. Increased exercise was associated with statistically significant reductions in endocrine disease costs and gastrointestinal prescription drug costs., Conclusions: This cohort demonstrates lower health care costs in employee populations when exercise frequency is increased. Employers may lower modifiable risk factors for chronic disease and reduce health care costs by promoting exercise among their employee population.

Background and Objective: The ideal suture for abdominal fascial closure has yet to be determined. Surgical practice continues to rely largely on tradition rather than high-quality level I evidence. The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to determine which suture material and technique reduces the odds of incisional hernia., Methods: MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles in English published from 1966 to 1998 using the keywords "suture", "abdomen/surgery", and "randomized controlled trials". Randomized controlled trials, trials of adult patients, and trials with a Jadad Quality Score of more than 3, comparing suture materials, technique, or both, were included. Two independent reviewers critically appraised study quality and extracted data. The reviewers were masked to the study site, authors, journal, and date to minimize bias. The primary outcome was postoperative incisional hernia. Secondary outcomes included wound dehiscence, infection, wound pain, and suture sinus formation., Results: The occurrence of incisional hernia was significantly lower when nonabsorbable sutures were used. Suture technique favored nonabsorbable continuous closure. Suture sinuses and wound pain were significantly lower when absorbable sutures were used. There were no differences in the incidence of wound dehiscence or wound infection with respect to suture material or method of closure. Subgroup analyses of individual sutures showed no significant difference in incisional hernia rates between polydioxanone and polypropylene. Polyglactin showed an increased wound failure rate., Conclusions: Abdominal fascial closure with a continuous nonabsorbable suture had a significantly lower rate of incisional hernia. The ideal suture is nonabsorbable, and the ideal technique is continuous.

Objective: To identify factors associated with post-term birth and factors associated with adverse outcomes in post-term births., Methods: The sample was a 10-year cohort (1978-1987) of term (n = 379,445) and post-term (n = 65,796) births from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Gestational age was based on mothers' recall of the last menstrual period. Multivariate analyses included proportional hazards regression and binomial logistic regression., Results: After controlling for covariates, there was only a slightly increased risk of perinatal mortality in post-term as compared with term births (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97, 1.27). For post-term births, risk factors for perinatal mortality were small size for gestational age (SGA) (adjusted RR 5.68; 95% CI 4.37, 7.38) and maternal age 35 years or older (adjusted RR 1.88; 95% CI 1.22, 2.89), whereas large size for gestational age (LGA) was a protective factor (adjusted RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.26, 1.00). Similar risk factor RRs were found for perinatal mortality in term births. Fetal distress was associated with both SGA and post-term birth; labor dysfunction and obstetric trauma were associated with both LGA and post-term birth; shoulder dystocia and maternal hemorrhage were associated with LGA only., Conclusions: Among post-term births, maternal complications were generally associated with larger fetal size, and fetal complications were associated with smaller fetal size. The evidence for an adverse impact on perinatal mortality of post-term birth is weak once other factors are taken into account.