Search

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure. The angiotensin type-1 blocking and cardioprotective properties of perindopril and enalapril were studied in a rat model of dilated cardiomyopathy after autoimmune myocarditis. Enalapril at 20 mg/kg showed the same angiotensin type-1 blocking action as perindopril at 2 mg/kg in rats with heart failure. Twenty-eight days after immunization, surviving Lewis rats (90/120 = 75%) were divided into six groups and administered perindopril at 0.02, 0.2 and 2 mg/kg per day (Groups P0.02, P0.2 and P2), enalapril at 2 and 20 mg/kg per day (Groups E2 and E20) or vehicle alone (Group V, all groups n = 15). After oral administration for 1 month, four of 15 (27%) rats in Group V, and two (13%) in Groups P0.02 and E2 died. None of the animals in Groups P0.2, P2 and E20, or normal rats (Group N) died. Although both angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors improved ventricular function in a dose-dependent manner, the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and area of myocardial fibrosis were lower, and +/- dP/dt was higher in Group P2 (4.9 +/- 0.6 mmHg, 7.5 +/- 1.4% and +2651 +/- 254/-2622 +/- 189 mmHg/s, respectively) than in Group V (16.7 +/- 1.3, 36 +/- 2.6 and +2659 +/- 176/-2516 +/- 205, respectively) and Group E20 (7.5 +/- 2.5, 15.6 +/- 2.0 and +2018 +/- 110/-2097 +/- 102, respectively). Although the expression levels of transforming growth factor-beta1 and collagen-III mRNA in Group V (36.3 +/- 5.7 and 157.6 +/- 12.7%) were significantly higher than those in Group N (19.6 +/- 3.0 and 65.2 +/- 1.5%, both p < 0.01), they were reduced in Group P2 (21.4 +/- 5.9 and 75.2 +/- 9.3%, both p < 0.01). These results suggest that although enalapril can block increases in blood pressure caused by circulating angiotensin type-1, perindopril at 2 mg/kg may confer greater protection than enalapril at 20 mg/kg against injury from the renin-angiotensin system in heart failure.

Background and Purpose: We sought to quantify the effects of blood pressure lowering on long-term disability and dependency among patients with cerebrovascular disease., Methods: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 6105 participants with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack in the past 5 years were recruited from 172 hospital outpatient clinics in 10 countries. Subjects were randomly assigned to the following groups: active treatment (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril [4 mg/d] for all patients, with the diuretic indapamide added at the discretion of treating physicians) or matching placebo(s). Measurements were disability (defined as a Barthel Index score < or =99/100) and dependency (a positive response to the following question: "In the last 2 weeks has the patient required regular help with everyday activities?")., Results: The median duration of follow-up was 4 years. At the last available assessment, 19% of the active treatment group and 22% of the placebo group were disabled (adjusted odds ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.89; P<0.001). Twelve percent of the active treatment group and 14% of the placebo group were dependent (adjusted odds ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.99; P=0.04). The effects of treatment appeared to be mediated primarily through the prevention of disability and dependency associated with recurrent stroke. Four-year treatment with the study drug regimen would be expected to result in the avoidance of 1 case of long-term disability for every 30 (95% CI, 19 to 79) patients., Conclusions: Among individuals with cerebrovascular disease, a perindopril-based blood pressure-lowering regimen not only reduced the risk of stroke and major vascular events but also substantially reduced the risks of associated long-term disability and dependency.

Purpose of Review: Elevated blood pressure is one of the most potent risk factors for first ever and recurrent stroke as well as influencing early outcome after acute stroke. There have been a number of significant randomized controlled trials which may influence management in each of these three categories., Recent Findings: For primary prevention, the recent information from the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation, Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction to Hypertension, Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly and Australian National Blood Pressure Study support the view that blood pressure lowering protects against stroke regardless of baseline blood pressure level. There is some evidence that blockade of the angiotensin system may give additional protection. For secondary prevention, evidence from the Perindopril Protection against Recurrent Stroke Study shows that blood pressure lowering with perindopril based therapy reduces fatal or non-fatal stroke events, again in hypertensive or normotensive individuals. There is uncertainty about blood pressure lowering in acute stroke, although presentation of the recent Acute Candesartan Cilexetil Evaluation in Stroke Survivors trial in which there was significant protection against vascular events using candesartan suggests that further studies should be undertaken., Summary: Blood pressure lowering for primary prevention of stroke should be undertaken using a variety of therapeutic agents. For secondary stroke prevention perindopril based therapy should be used based on current evidence. Uncertainty still exists as to whether blood pressure lowering in the acute stroke setting is safe or improves outcomes.

Objective: To review the efficacy and safety of the very-low-dose combination of 2 mg perindopril and 0.625 mg indapamide in essential hypertension., Study Selection: The five main studies from the European registration file were performed in hypertensive outpatients and included two phase II double-blind randomised dose-ranging studies, and three phase III double-blind randomised studies (one study comparing placebo with each of the components, one long-term study over 15 months and one study comparing the combination and losartan)., Main Outcome Measures: Decreases in systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures measured at trough with a mercury sphygmomanometer, an automatic device (Omron), and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM)., Results: The combination 2 mg perindopril and 0.625 mg indapamide was selected from the dose-finding studies. Twelve weeks after participants in the randomised studies were allocated to groups, the reductions in SBP, measured with an Omron device, were 12.3 +/- 15.0 mmHg with the combination, 8.0 +/- 16.5 mmHg with 2 mg perindopril (P = 0.001), 9.4 +/- 14.3 mmHg with 0.625 mg indapamide (P = 0.023), and 2.1 +/- 16.8 mmHg with placebo (P < 0.001) (mean +/- SD; all P values are for comparisons with the combination). The reductions in DBP were 6.8 +/- 9.2 mmHg, 5.0 +/- 9.5 mmHg (P = 0.02), 4.7 +/- 8.2 mmHg (P = 0.004), and 2.4 +/- 9.6 mmHg (P < 0.001) in the combination, 2 mg perindopril, 0.625 mg indapamide and placebo groups, respectively. During the long-term study, among 235 patients who achieved initial blood pressure normalisation with the fixed combination, 79.8% sustained their normalisation over 1 year, with no significant difference regarding safety criteria: the occurrence of adverse drug reactions per patient per year was 0.37 and 0.28 in the combination and placebo groups, respectively. A significantly (P < 0.05) larger blood pressure decreasing effect on nocturnal mean SBP (by ABPM) was demonstrated for the combination compared with that achieved with losartan, with no difference in safety., Conclusions: The proven efficacy on DBP and SBP, and the good safety profile, confirm that the new low-dose combination of 2 mg perindopril and 0.625 mg indapamide is a valuable option in the first-line treatment of hypertension.

Background and Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril on mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), cerebral blood flow (CBF), and glomerular filtration rate in hypertensive stroke patients with moderate to severe internal carotid artery (ICA) disease or ICA occlusion., Methods: Twenty-four nonacute ischemic stroke patients who had MABP readings >100 mm Hg and moderate to severe ICA stenosis or occlusion were randomized to receive perindopril 4 mg daily or placebo for 14 days. MABP, ICA flow, and both middle cerebral artery (MCA) velocity and resistance index were measured before dose, at 5 time points over the subsequent 24 hours, and finally at 2 weeks. Brain hexamethyl propylene amine oxide single photon emission computed tomography scans were performed before drug administration and at time of peak drug effect (6 to 8 hours) after the first dose. Glomerular filtration rate was measured with (51)Cr EDTA before medication and at 14 days., Results: A placebo-corrected BP fall of 17/10 mm Hg was seen (P:=0.017), which was maximal at 5.5 hours. No significant change in ICA flow or MCA velocity was seen between groups. No significant change in hemispheric CBF was seen. The mean change from baseline in the treated group was -0.79 mL. 100 g(-1). min(-1) (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65 to -3.23); mean change in the placebo group was -1.9 mL. 100 g(-1). min(-1) (95%CI, 3.02 to -6.92). Peri-infarct CBF was similarly unaffected. One of the treated patients developed transient acute renal impairment and was withdrawn from the study on day 4., Conclusions: Perindopril lowers BP without lowering CBF in hypertensive stroke patients with moderate to severe ICA stenosis or occlusion; monitoring of this patient population for the complications of renal artery stenosis should be considered.