Search

Introduction: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) struck Toronto in the spring of 2003, causing many deaths, serious morbidity, forced quarantine of thousands of individuals, and the closure of all provincial hospitals for several weeks. Given the direction by public health authorities to cancel or postpone all continuing medical education (CME) courses, including those sponsored by the University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, SARS has had a profound effect on the delivery of CME in Toronto and beyond. Method: Case study design using existing documents and self-report. Results: The immediate, specific response of the University of Toronto CME program to SARS is described for the period from March 2003 to September 2003. Discussion: During major outbreaks of infectious disease, continuing education providers should maintain regular contact with public health authorities and learners, enact a rational process for postponing or canceling courses, and implement a disaster plan flexible enough to ensure the delivery of education using technological advances. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the long-term efficacy and tolerability of two efavirenz-containing regimens with those of an indinavir-containing regimen in the initial use of HAART., Method: HIV-1-infected patients (N = 1266) were randomly assigned to receive one of three regimens: efavirenz, zidovudine plus lamivudine, n = 422; efavirenz plus indinavir, n = 429; or indinavir, zidovudine plus lamivudine, n = 415. Entrance criteria included baseline viral load greater than 10 000 copies/ml HIV-1 RNA, CD4 cell count 50 cells/mul or greater, and no previous use of lamivudine, any non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor or protease inhibitor. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients (response rate) in each regimen with a viral load under 400 copies/ml at 168 weeks of treatment., Results: Response rates at 168 weeks were 30% in the indinavir, zidovudine, lamivudine group, 48% in the efavirenz, zidovudine, lamivudine group (P < 0.0001, difference estimate; 97.5% confidence interval (CI) 18.5; 10.9, 26), and 40% in the efavirenz plus indinavir group (P = 0.0018, difference estimate; 97.5% CI 10.2; 2.9, 17.6). Median CD4 cell counts increased above respective baselines by 292 cells/mul (efavirenz, zidovudine, lamivudine and indinavir, zidovudine, lamivudine) and 300 cells/mul (efavirenz plus indinavir). Total discontinuations were 54% (efavirenz, zidovudine, lamivudine), 63% (efavirenz plus indinavir), and 69% (indinavir, zidovudine, lamivudine) of which 13, 12 and 26%, respectively, were caused by adverse events. No new or unexpected increases in the rates or severity of adverse events occurred from long-term treatment with efavirenz-containing regimens., Conclusion: Long-term HIV therapy with efavirenz-containing regimens, particularly efavirenz, zidovudine, lamivudine, provides significantly greater antiviral activity and tolerability than a regimen of indinavir, zidovudine plus lamivudine.

Objective: To assess the importance of baseline characteristics including medical history, indicators of current disease status, therapeutic drug use, in vitro drug susceptibility, immune status and mycobacterial load on bacteriologic response and survival in HIV-positive patients with Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) bacteremia., Design: An observational substudy of an open-label randomized controlled trial of two alternative therapeutic regimens for MAC., Setting: Twenty-four hospital-based HIV clinics in 16 Canadian cities., Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures were survival and bacteriologic response, defined by consecutive negative blood cultures for MAC at least 2 weeks apart within 16 weeks of study entry., Results: Prior AIDS diagnosis, low Karnofsky score, active unstable AIDS-related conditions, absence of antiretroviral therapy and absence of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia prophylaxis were associated with shorter survival by univariate regression using the proportional hazards model. On multivariate analysis, antiretroviral therapy was not an independent predictor of mortality, and previous rifabutin prophylaxis was independently associated with poor survival outcomes, a result consistent across study treatment. Using a logistic regression model, baseline quantitative mycobacterial load [relative odds of clearing, 1.97 for a decrease of 1 log10 colony forming count; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.36-2.87; P < 0.001] and Karnofsky score were the only statistically significant univariate predictors of clearance, although previous prophylaxis with rifabutin was also a significant predictor in a multivariate model (relative odds of clearing, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.17-0.88; P < 0.05)., Conclusions: This study indicates that although the level of MAC bacteremia is an important predictor of clearance, it is not associated with survival.

Objective: To assess the effect of filgrastim treatment on the incidence of severe neutropenia in patients with advanced HIV infection, and the effect of initial filgrastim treatment on prevention of infectious morbidity., Design: Randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter study., Setting: Outpatient centers and physician offices., Patients: Men and women aged > 13 years, who were HIV antibody-positive, and had a CD4 cell count < 200 x 10(6)/l, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) 0.75-1.0 x 10(9)/l, and platelet count > or = 50 x 10(9)/l within 7 days of randomization were eligible. Two hundred and fifty-eight patients entered and 201 completed the study., Intervention: Daily filgrastim (starting at 1 microg/kg daily, adjusted up to 10 microg/kg daily) or intermittent filgrastim (starting at 300 microg daily one to three times per week to a maximum of 600 microg daily 7 days weekly) was administered to maintain an ANC between 2 and 10 x 10(9)/l. Patients in the control group received filgrastim if severe neutropenia developed., Main Outcome Measures: Incidence of severe neutropenia (ANC < 0.5 x 10(9)/l) or death, incidence of bacterial and fungal infections, duration of hospitalization and intravenous antibacterial use, and safety., Results: The primary endpoint of severe neutropenia or death was less frequent in patients who received daily (12.8%) or intermittent (8.2%) filgrastim compared with control patients (34.1%; P<0.002 and P<0.0001 for comparison with daily and intermittent groups, respectively). Filgrastim-treated patients developed 31% fewer bacterial infections and 54% fewer severe bacterial infections than control patients, required 26% less hospital days including 45% fewer hospital days for bacterial infections, and needed 28% fewer days of intravenous antibacterials. Filgrastim was not associated with an increase in HIV-1 plasma RNA level in a subset of patients in whom this was measured or any new or unexpected adverse events., Conclusion: Filgrastim was safe and effective in preventing severe neutropenia in patients with advanced HIV infection, and may reduce the incidence and duration of bacterial infections, incidence of severe bacterial infections, duration of hospital days for infections, and days of intravenous antibacterial agents.

Thirty-five AIDS patients (mean CD4 count 44 x 10(6)/L) with chronic cryptosporidiosis were treated with letrazuril at an initial oral daily dose of 50 mg in an open-label Phase I prospective trial. Treatment was continued for > or = 10 days and for as long as there was a response. The majority of subjects (91%), had previously failed paromomycin treatment. At baseline, 74% of patients had moderate (five to nine bowel movements per day) to severe (> 10 bowel movements per day) diarrhea. Twenty-three subjects (66%) had a clinical response within a mean of 1.7 weeks of treatment initiation. Twenty-two patients had a partial response (> 50% reduction in bowel movements per day for > or = 1 week), one patient had a complete response (two or fewer bowel movements per day). Of the responders, 15 (65%) had a clinical relapse with worsening diarrhea at an average of 1.2 months following initiation of letrazuril. The other eight (35%) had had symptom control for an average of 2.9 months from initiation of letrazuril to the latest follow-up. Microbiologic eradication was demonstrated in 10 (40%) of 25 patients with follow-up stool examinations. Seven patients (20%) experienced a rash, all within 1 week of starting the drug, and resolved in all patients when the drug was discontinued. In conclusion, severely immunocompromised AIDS patients with refractory cryptosporidiosis may show a modest, short-lived response to letrazuril. Microbiologic response is variable and relapse high. Rash is a major limiting side effect of the drug.