Search

We examined the dose-response relationship of intrathecal clonidine at small doses (

We describe the phenotype of a 5 year old girl with features resembling Temtamy syndrome, including agenesis of the corpus callosum, ventriculomegaly, frontal bossing, peaked eyebrows, ptosis, malformed and low set ears, a depressed nasal bridge, a long philtrum, and iris and chorioretinal colobomas. Features unique to this child include profound mental retardation, bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, agenesis of the corpus callosum, patent ductus arteriosus, ventricular septal defect, unilateral renal agenesis, neurogenic bladder and hydronephrosis. High resolution chromosome analysis demonstrated a de novo, balanced translocation [46,XX,t(2;9)(p24;q32)]; and her case has some overlapping phenotypic features with cases of monosomy for 2p. This is the first documented case of Temtamy syndrome with a specific chromosomal anomaly, and will assist with the elucidation of the syndrome's underlying genetic defect.

Research reported during the past year has enhanced our understanding of conditions that lead to the complex changes that are observed in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. An association between placental pathology and a multisystem disorder that is characterized by endothelial dysfunction which involves genetic and immunological investigations has been identified. On the basis of these findings, promising screening tools for early detection of pre-eclampsia were identified. No marked changes in anaesthetic approach to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy occurred during the period of review, apart from a reappraisal of spinal anaesthesia as a safe technique in caesarean section, even in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. A multidisciplinary approach to management and therapy is needed and the right balance must be sought between the needs of the mother and baby, both of which are jeopardized by the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Recent reports of severe neurological injury after spinal anaesthesia have generated concerns about the neurotoxic potential of local anaesthetics and, in particular, of lignocaine. Further, there is an increasing body of evidence indicating that transient neurological symptoms commonly occur after uneventful lignocaine spinal anaesthesia but not after bupivacaine. Results from an epidemiological study suggest that patient positioning and outpatient status are major co-factors. Neither the dose nor the concentration of lignocaine appear to reduce the risk for transient neurological symptoms. Available data on alternative short-acting local anaesthetics with respect to transient neurological symptoms are limited and conflicting. Experimental data provide further information on factors contributing to local anaesthetic induced neurotoxicity: adrenaline significantly increases the neurotoxic effects of lignocaine in vivo, whereas the addition of glucose does not.

Background: Recent evidence suggests that transient neurologic symptoms (TNSs) frequently follow lidocaine spinal anesthesia but are infrequent with bupivacaine. However, identification of a short-acting local anesthetic to substitute for lidocaine for brief surgical procedures remains an important goal. Prilocaine is an amide local anesthetic with a duration of action similar to that of lidocaine. Accordingly, the present, prospective double-blind study compares prilocaine with lidocaine and bupivacaine with respect to duration of action and relative risk of TNSs., Methods: Ninety patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II who were scheduled for short gynecologic procedures under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive 2.5 ml 2% lidocaine in 7.5% glucose, 2% prilocaine in 7.5% glucose, or 0.5% bupivacaine in 7.5% glucose. All solutions were provided in blinded vials by the hospital pharmacy. Details of spinal puncture, extension and regression of spinal block, and the times to reach discharge criteria were noted. In the evening of postoperative day 1, patients were evaluated for TNSs by a physician unaware of the drug administered and the details of the anesthetic procedure., Results: Nine of 30 patients receiving lidocaine experienced TNSs, 1 of 30 patients receiving prilocaine (P = 0.03) had them, and none of 30 patients receiving bupivacaine had TNSs. Times to ambulate and to void were similar after lidocaine and prilocaine (150 vs. 165 min and 238 vs. 253 min, respectively) but prolonged after bupivacaine (200 and 299 min, respectively; P < 0.05)., Conclusions: Prilocaine may be preferable to lidocaine for short surgical procedures because it has a similar duration of action but a lower incidence of TNSs.

Recent reports suggest that transient neurologic symptoms are common after spinal anesthesia with 5% lidocaine. To determine whether reducing the anesthetic concentration might decrease the incidence of symptoms, 50 ASA class I or II patients undergoing brief gynecologic procedures under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive 1 mg/kg of either 5% or 2% lidocaine in 7.5% glucose. Patients were evaluated on the first postoperative day by an anesthesiologist who was unaware of the solution administered or the details of the anesthetic procedure. Symptoms suggestive of transient radicular irritation were observed in 8 patients (32%) receiving 5% lidocaine, and in 10 patients (40%) receiving 2% lidocaine (NS). These results confirm our previous findings that transient neurologic symptoms may occur in up to one third of the patients receiving 5% lidocaine, and indicate that a modest reduction in lidocaine concentration does not reduce risk.

We recently reported several cases consistent with transient radicular irritation after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric 5% lidocaine. The present prospective, blind, nonrandomized study was performed to determine the incidence of these transient neurologic symptoms and to identify factors that might be associated with their occurrence. We studied 270 patients scheduled for gynecologic or obstetric procedures under spinal anesthesia. For spinal anesthesia, either 5% lidocaine in 7.5% glucose or 0.5% bupivacaine in 8.5% glucose was used. Patients were evaluated on postoperative day 3 by a quality assurance nurse who was unaware of the drug given or details of the anesthetic technique. Transient neurologic symptoms were observed in 37% of patients receiving 5% lidocaine, whereas only one patient receiving 0.5% bupivacaine had transient hypesthesia of the lateral aspect of the right foot. These results suggest that symptoms were the result of a specific drug effect. However, because of the limitations of the study one cannot conclude that lidocaine per se was the cause.