Search

Introduction: Medical Spanish programs commonly engage Spanish-speaking standardized patients (SPs) for communication skills assessment, yet no studies address SP recruitment, selection, or training., Methods: We sent questionnaires to medical Spanish faculty at 20 US medical schools to gauge their practices in recruiting and selecting Spanish-language SPs. We invited faculty to distribute a separate questionnaire to Spanish-language SPs to gather SP language abilities, training, and experience. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. When available, we reviewed SP video encounters to formally assess participating SPs' linguistic performance using the SP Oral Language Observation Matrix, a rating tool adapted from the Physician Oral Language Observation Matrix to assess oral medical Spanish proficiency., Results: Eighty percent of faculty (16/20) responded. Standardized patient recruitment sources included institutional English-language SPs, Hispanic student groups and professional organizations, communities, and language professionals. Faculty-reported strategies to determine language readiness included interviewing SP candidates in Spanish and asking them to self-rate language skills using a validated scale. Fifteen SPs (54%, 15/28) from 5 schools responded to the SP questionnaire, and one third (5/15) reported that their Spanish was not assessed before being selected as an SP. In addition, one third (5/15) did not receive any initial training before performing a medical Spanish case. Raters assessed 11 different SPs using the SP Oral Language Observation Matrix, and 6 were rated as linguistically "ready" for the SP role., Conclusions: Current approaches to recruitment, training, and language assessment of SPs vary. We propose strategies to ensure that medical Spanish encounters authentically reflect Spanish-speaking patients., Competing Interests: P.O., L.C.D., S.E.G., L.K., C.P.-C., and J.G. were supported by a grant from the National Board of Medical Examiners Stemmler Fund. L.C.D. was also supported by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Support Grant/Core Grant (P30 CA008748). P.O. receives author royalties from Elsevier. L.C.D. receives author royalties from Multilingual Matters. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Simulation in Healthcare.)

Background: Local tissue rearrangement, free flap reconstruction, and Bilayer Wound Matrix represent reconstructive modalities for coverage of scalp defects; however, preferred indications are less clear. The authors aimed to evaluate the efficacy of these interventions., Methods: A retrospective review (2008 to 2019) was performed of subjects requiring soft-tissue reconstruction of oncologic scalp wounds. Subjects were dual matched into two comparative cohorts: (1) local tissue rearrangement versus Bilayer Wound Matrix, and (2) free flap reconstruction versus Bilayer Wound Matrix. Ninety-day wound coverage, hospital length of stay, operative time, and wound complications were compared., Results: In total, 361 subjects were included. Following matching, 126 subjects constituted the local tissue rearrangement versus Bilayer Wound Matrix cohort, and 56 constituted the free flap reconstruction versus Bilayer Wound Matrix cohort. Local tissue rearrangement/Bilayer Wound Matrix median defect size was 35 ± 42.5 cm2. Local tissue rearrangement provided significantly better wound coverage at 90 days (95.2 percent) compared to Bilayer Wound Matrix (84.1 percent) (p < 0.040). Median defect size in the free flap reconstruction/Bilayer Wound Matrix cohort was 100 ± 101.1 cm2. Ninety-day success (free flap reconstruction, 92.9 percent; Bilayer Wound Matrix, 96.4 percent; p < 1.00) and reoperation rates (14.3 percent versus 3.6 percent; p < 0.352) were similar. However, free flap reconstruction had significantly greater operative times (418 minutes versus 100 minutes; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Local tissue rearrangement may be more reliable for smaller wounds (<100 cm2) compared to Bilayer Wound Matrix. Bilayer Wound Matrix may have comparable efficacy to free flap reconstruction for larger defects (150 to 250 cm2), and may be more cost-effective, given greater operative time and length of stay associated with free flap reconstruction., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, III., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Located on 6q15 and 1p36.11, cannabinoid receptor 1 (CNR1) and cannabinoid receptor 2 (CNR2) genes are considered to be a positional and functional candidate gene for the development of mental disorders such as schizophrenia because CNR1 is known as a regulator of dopamine signaling in the hippocampus and the cerebral cortex. However, few genetic studies have been carried out to investigate an association of CNR1 and CNR2 polymorphisms and the risk of schizophrenia. In this study, although the result indicates that CNR1 and CNR2 variations are unlikely to influence schizophrenia susceptibility in a Korean population, the findings would provide meaningful information for further genetic studies.

Study Design: One hundred twelve fresh cadaveric spines were harvested using a newly described technique., Objectives: To develop and describe a technique for the expeditious excision of intact human cadaveric spines for biomechanical testing, to educate the dissector on the health and safety issues involved in harvesting spinal specimens, and to review the present recommendations for storage and preservation of spinal segments., Summary of the Background Data: As the need for biomechanical spinal research continues to expand, the demand for fresh human cadaveric vertebral specimens increases. Previous techniques for harvesting are simplistic and sparse. This technique offers a reliable and expeditious method for procurement of spinal vertebral segments of any size., Methods: Human cadaveric spines were harvested using an adaptation of previous posterior spinal approaches. Techniques for sectioning each vertebral region were developed. Detailed description of these techniques was meticulously documented. The procured spinal segments have been used for multiple biomechanical investigations., Results: The technique has been used successfully in more than 100 spinal harvests. Approximate time required is 30 minutes. The harvested segments have been reliable biomechanical specimens in many published studies., Conclusions: A new technique for the rapid extraction of human cadaveric spines has been developed. Dissectors may benefit from the recommendations offered for sectioning of each region.