Search

Background: A number of cerebral manifestations are associated with JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) which are diagnosed by detection of JCPyV in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), often with the support of cerebral imaging. Here we present an unusual case of a kidney transplant patient presenting with progressive neurological deterioration attributed to JCPyV encephalopathy., Methods: Quantitative polymerase chain reaction JCPyV was used prospectively and retrospectively to track the viral load within the patient blood, urine, CSF, and kidney sections. A JCPyV VP1 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure patient and donor antibody titers. Immunohistochemical staining was used to identify active JCPyV infection within the kidney allograft., Results: JC polyomavirus was detected in the CSF at the time of presentation. JC polyomavirus was not detected in pretransplant serum, however viral loads increased with time, peaking during the height of the neurological symptoms (1.5E copies/mL). No parenchymal brain lesions were evident on imaging, but transient cerebral venous sinus thrombosis was present. Progressive decline in neurological function necessitated immunotherapy cessation and allograft removal, which led to decreasing serum viral loads and resolution of neurological symptoms. JC polyomavirus was detected within the graft's collecting duct cells using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemical staining. The patient was JCPyV naive pretransplant, but showed high antibody titers during the neurological symptoms, with the IgM decrease paralleling the viral load after graft removal., Conclusions: We report a case of atypical JCPyV encephalopathy associated with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and disseminated primary JCPyV infection originating from the kidney allograft. Clinical improvement followed removal of the allograft and cessation of immunosuppression.

Objective: To explore attitudes toward new cervical cancer screening options and understand factors associated with those beliefs among women in routine gynecologic care., Methods: We used an interviewer-administered survey of 551 women aged 36-62 years enrolled in the HPV in Perimenopause Study. Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to estimate prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to compare women's preferences for cervical cancer screening methods and frequency., Results: A majority of women (55.6%, 95% CI 51.4-59.8%) were aware that screening recommendations had changed, yet 74.1% (95% CI 70.3-77.7%) still believed women should be screened annually. If recommended by their doctor, 68.4% (95% CI 64.4-72.2%) were willing to extend screening to every 3 years, but only 25.2% (95% CI 21.9-29.2%) would extend screening to 5 years. Most women (60.7%, 95% CI 56.5-65.7%) expressed a strong preference for Pap testing, and 41.4% (95% CI 37.4-45.6%) expressed at least moderate concern over having a human papillomavirus (HPV) test without a Pap test. A desire for more frequent care, higher degree of worry and perceived risk, and abnormal screening history were all associated with reduced willingness to accept HPV testing and longer screening intervals., Conclusion: A majority of routinely screened women indicated a willingness to adopt a cervical cancer screening strategy of cytology alone or Pap-HPV cotesting every 3 years if recommended by their physician. However, they remain concerned about HPV testing and extension of screening intervals to once every 5 years. Our results suggest continued reticence to accepting newer HPV-based screening algorithms among routinely screened women older than age 35 years.

Objectives: We explored the age-stratified correlates and correlations between high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection and cervical abnormalities in perimenopausal women., Materials and Methods: Human papillomavirus testing and Pap smear screening were performed at baseline on 841 routinely screened women age 35 to 60 years in the HPV in perimenopause cohort. Demographic, behavioral, and medical information was collected through telephone-administered questionnaires. Descriptive analyses were used to examine the correlation between HR-HPV infection and cervical abnormalities by age. Logistic regression was used to determine correlates of HPV and abnormalities in women younger and older than 45 years., Results: The prevalence of HPV, HR-HPV, and cervical abnormalities decreased significantly with increasing age, as did the correlation between HR-HPV and cervical abnormalities. The prevalence of HR-HPV was 50% among younger women with abnormalities but this decreased steadily to 20% HR-HPV detection among 50- to 54-year-old women, and no abnormalities were detected in 55- to 60-year-old women. Different correlates of HR-HPV infection and abnormalities were observed in women 45 years or older, a pattern not seen in younger women., Conclusions: Although the relative proportion of low-grade and high-grade abnormalities did not change with age, we saw a loss of concordance between HR-HPV detection and cytological abnormalities with increasing age. Current guidelines for cervical cancer screening group together all women age 30 years and older. Our data raise important questions about the interpretation of HPV and Pap test results in this age group and suggest that ongoing surveillance of HPV and cytology in cervical cancer screening programs consider a third age stratification among older women.