Search

Background: Chronic postcraniotomy headache (PCH) is common and debilitating. Unfortunately, the literature on this topic is sparse without clear management algorithms. Possible etiologies of PCH include nerve injury and/or entrapment, hardware, dural adhesions, or musculoskeletal injury. The purpose of this study was to present the results of both a systematic review of the literature and a single-center case series, both of which informed the development of a novel treatment algorithm that may be applied to this patient population., Methods: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we performed a systematic review of the literature, identifying articles describing the surgical management of PCH. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients who met the criteria for PCH treated at our institution. A patient's history and physical examination determined the etiology and management, and pain severity scores were the primary outcome measured., Results: Nineteen articles encompassing 131 patients described surgical management techniques for PCH. 83 patients (63.3%) had complete resolution of pain (χ2 = 52.1, P < 0.0001). At our institution, 19 patients underwent surgical management for PCH. A significant reduction in pain scores from 7.57 to 2.16 (P < 0.001) was demonstrated, and 84 percent of patients achieved complete or significant pain reduction., Conclusions: Through a literature review and our own case series, we demonstrate that surgical management of PCH can achieve remarkable results. Plastic surgeons, with their expanding role in treating migraine and headaches, are well suited to manage these patients. We present an algorithmic approach to simplify the management of this common and debilitating condition., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A neuropsychiatric diagnosis (ND) has the potential to affect patient satisfaction after breast reconstruction. However, literature regarding the interplay between neuropsychiatric diagnoses and revision operations after reconstruction remains sparse. In this study, we aim to determine whether neuropsychiatric diagnoses result in increased revision operations and healthcare utilization of plastic surgery resources after alloplastic and autologous breast reconstruction., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 200 patients from 2010 to 2019 who underwent postmastectomy alloplastic or autologous breast reconstruction by a single surgeon at our institution. We evaluated for the presence of neuropsychiatric diagnoses, type of neuropsychiatric diagnoses, number of revisions, and number of postreconstruction plastic surgery appointments. Continuous variables were compared using independent samples t tests, and categorical variables were compared using χ 2 tests., Results: Of the 196 patients who met inclusion criteria, the majority underwent at least one revision (65.3%). The presence of an ND did not predict a higher number of revision operations ( P = 0.512) nor was the timing of the diagnosis (preoperative vs postoperative) significantly associated with the number of revision procedures ( P = 0.156). The patients who had a ND at any point during the reconstructive process had a significantly higher number of plastic surgery appointments and a longer duration of follow-up compared with the patients without any neuropsychiatric diagnoses ( P = 0.009 and P = 0.040, respectively). Complications did not impact the number of revision operations ( P = 0.780)., Conclusions: Neuropsychiatric diagnoses do not significantly influence the number of revision operations after breast reconstruction. However, neuropsychiatric diagnoses result in increased healthcare utilization of plastic surgery resources that may lead to increased healthcare costs., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Facial palsy may have deleterious effects for pediatric patients. The most common reconstruction is 2-stage free gracilis muscle transfer (FGMT) after cross-face nerve graft (CFNG). This requires a prolonged period from time of surgery to smile. New techniques using both a CFNG and motor nerve to masseter (MNM) as dual power sources in a single-stage surgery have been described in adults. Here, we examine our experience with this technique in children., Methods: A retrospective study was performed examining patients who underwent dual-innervated single-stage FGMT at 2 pediatric hospitals from 2016 to 2019. Demographics, etiology, perioperative characteristics, time to mandibular and emotional smile, and Sunnybrook scores were recorded., Results: Five patients met inclusion criteria with a mean age of 11.8 (range, 8-20). Two patients had congenital facial palsy while 3 had acquired facial palsy. Four patients (80%) received dual end-to-end neural coaptations of the CFNG and MNM to the obturator nerve. One (20%) had end-to-side coaptation of the CFNG to the obturator nerve and end-to-end of the MNM to the obturator nerve. The average time to mandibular smile was 103 ± 15.4 days. The average time to emotional smile was 245 ± 48.1 days. The preoperative Sunnybrook scale was 32 ± 7.5 and improved to 55.3 ± 20.6 at 8 months postoperatively., Conclusions: Dual-innervated FGMT is effective for facial reanimation in children with unilateral facial palsy. Patients can harness a stronger motor source (MNM) and the component of an emotional stimulus (CFNG). This approach may be the new criterion standard pediatric facial reanimation., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)